The Army says it has launched an investigation into the circumstances surrounding how and why Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl disappeared from his base in Afghanistan in 2009.
Maj. Gen. Kenneth Dahl, an Army officer with Afghanistan combat experience, will lead the effort — but the Army says that will not include formal questioning of Bergdahl himself, at least not right away.
“The investigating officer will not interview Sgt. Bergdahl until the reintegration team clears such interaction, so no timeline for completion of the investigation has been set,” the Army statement offers.
Bergdahl, 28, went missing on June 30, 2009, in Afghanistan’s Paktika province, where his battalion was deployed. He spent five years in captivity until his release on May 31, in a controversial exchange by the Obama administration for five Taliban prisoners transferred from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The administration says that concerns about Bergdahl’s deteriorating health played a role in its thinking.
Bergdahl was transported from a military hospital last Friday and taken to an Army medical facility in San Antonio, Texas. In a statement released Monday announcing the investigation, the Army did not make any mention of earlier preliminary fact-finding efforts that indicated Berdahl had left his post deliberately.
But the statement does say that Dahl and his investigative team “will have access to previously gathered documentary evidence, including the 2009 investigation.”
“The primary function of this investigation, as in any other investigation, is to ascertain facts and report them to the appointing authority,” the statement adds. But it says, “The Army’s top priority remains Sgt. Bergdahl’s health and reintegration. We ask that everyone respect the time and privacy necessary to accomplish the objectives of the last phase of reintegration.”
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.