Who Really Broke Veterans Affairs?

It stains the legacies of presidents as far back as John F. Kennedy.

National Journal
Jordain Carney Stacy Kaper
May 20, 2014, 1 a.m.

Part Two in a series on Vet­er­ans Af­fairs. Read Part One here.

Fail­ure is an orphan — and there are few fail­ures more tox­ic than those of the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment.

The VA, os­tens­ibly cre­ated to help vet­er­ans heal from the wounds of war, is plagued by a back­log of claims from sol­diers seek­ing help, leav­ing them to wait months or even years for com­pens­a­tion.

There’s con­sensus that the back­log is un­ac­cept­able, and Pres­id­ent Obama’s ad­min­is­tra­tion pledged to elim­in­ate it by the end of 2015. But the de­part­ment — and the back­log — is get­ting new at­ten­tion due to a spate of deaths at VA hos­pit­als, and Re­pub­lic­ans are at­tempt­ing to pin the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s fail­ures squarely on the pres­id­ent.

Look­ing for a lone vil­lain in the VA de­bacle, however, is a fool’s er­rand. It’s true that — des­pite hold­ing the world’s most power­ful post for five years — Obama is yet to elim­in­ate the long wait­ing times for vet­er­ans seek­ing help. Blam­ing him alone, however, is to ig­nore roots of the prob­lem that stretch back dec­ades be­fore Obama took the Oval Of­fice.

In­stead, the sheen of shame over the VA’s fail­ures spreads across time and party af­fil­i­ation. It stains the legacies of pres­id­ents as far back as John F. Kennedy and con­demns past Con­gresses whose poor over­sight al­lowed the prob­lem to fester. The VA it­self is also not without fault, as bur­eau­cracy and in­transigence let the de­part­ment de­teri­or­ate to the point the prob­lem be­came nearly im­possible to fix.

So who really broke the VA? In sum, it’s a fail­ure with many si­lent fath­ers.

Pres­id­ent Obama

Obama’s ex­per­i­ence with the VA is a test­a­ment to the danger of big prom­ises — and high ex­pect­a­tions.

He pledged to end the claims back­log while sim­ul­tan­eously mak­ing a string of moves that summoned a flood of new claims to the de­part­ment. (JEW­EL SA­MAD/AFP/Getty Im­ages)

The ad­min­is­tra­tion made it easi­er for vet­er­ans to get com­pens­a­tion for both post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­order and ex­pos­ure to Agent Or­ange — a Vi­et­nam War-era de­fo­li­ant now tied to a long list of neur­o­lo­gic­al dis­orders. Those moves ex­ten­ded help to long-suf­fer­ing vet­er­ans, but they wer­en’t matched by the VA re­forms needed to ad­equately ad­dress the new claims. Agent Or­ange alone took up 37 per­cent of the Vet­er­ans Be­ne­fits Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s claims-pro­cessing re­sources na­tion­ally from Oc­to­ber 2010 to March 2012, ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port.

And as claims soared dur­ing Obama’s first years in of­fice, so did wait times. In 2009, there were about 423,000 claims at the VA, with 150,000 claims pending for more than four months (the of­fi­cial wait time it takes a claim to be con­sidered “back­logged”). By 2012, claims had ex­ploded to more than 883,000 — and 586,540 of those sat on the VA’s back­log list.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion did re­quest — and get from Con­gress — ad­di­tion­al fund­ing for the de­part­ment. The VA’s budget totaled $100 bil­lion in 2009. In 2014, it was up to $154 bil­lion. But that money doesn’t in­stantly trans­fer in­to an ex­pan­ded ca­pa­city to meet vet­er­ans’ needs: It takes ap­prox­im­ately two years to fully train a claims work­er; the blame for the staff crunch doesn’t rest on Obama’s shoulders alone.

The in­flux of claims has since fallen, and the back­log is greatly di­min­ished — though there is con­tro­versy over how the ad­min­is­tra­tion has dealt with the claims. (For more on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s struggle to fix the VA, see Part One.)

“As a can­did­ate, Barack Obama prom­ised vet­er­ans the moon, but in many cases he hasn’t de­livered as pres­id­ent,” said GOP Rep. Jeff Miller of Flor­ida, the chair­man of the House Vet­er­ans Af­fairs Com­mit­tee. “VA’s dis­ab­il­ity claims back­log grew to his­tor­ic levels on his watch. “¦ Can­did­ate Obama prom­ised the most trans­par­ent ad­min­is­tra­tion in his­tory, but his VA is a case study in how to stone­wall the press, the pub­lic, and Con­gress.”

Con­gress

Miller’s own branch of gov­ern­ment, however, can­not claim clean hands.

The VA could be over­hauled to bet­ter ad­dress the needs of mod­ern vet­er­ans, in­clud­ing re­forms to the way it pro­cesses claims, as­sesses the per­form­ance of its em­ploy­ees, and meas­ures its over­all per­form­ance. But put­ting many of those re­forms in place would re­quire an act of Con­gress — and thus far those haven’t happened.

In­stead, Con­gress has taken a more re­act­ive ap­proach. When in­cid­ents — such as the re­cent hos­pit­al deaths — cap­ture pub­lic at­ten­tion, law­makers hold hear­ings where they be­rate VA of­fi­cials with juicy sound bites they can later play back for their con­stitu­ents. It’s good polit­ic­al theat­er, but it’s un­clear that the pay­off is any­thing oth­er than polit­ic­al.

“Con­gress has been totally ex­as­per­ated by the VA’s in­ab­il­ity to get on top of the prob­lem for a long time,” said Linda Bilmes, a seni­or lec­turer in pub­lic policy at Har­vard Uni­versity’s Kennedy School. “But they haven’t been will­ing to really con­tem­plate any­thing oth­er than throw­ing more money at the prob­lem.”

Con­gress is tak­ing some le­gis­lat­ive steps now: The House is slated to vote this week on a VA ac­count­ab­il­ity bill to make it easi­er to fire seni­or ex­ec­ut­ives, and the latest VA fund­ing bill banned bo­nuses to de­part­ment ex­ec­ut­ives. But neither meas­ure con­tains changes on the struc­tur­al level. (Mark Wilson/Getty Im­ages)

And even when Con­gress has passed le­gis­la­tion aimed at im­prov­ing the de­part­ment, its re­cord of ef­fic­acy is mixed at best — es­pe­cially in terms of elim­in­at­ing the claims back­log.

In 2000, law­makers passed the Vet­er­ans Claims As­sist­ance Act. The law was signed by Pres­id­ent Clin­ton and was, by all ac­counts, a well-mean­ing at­tempt to make it easi­er for vet­er­ans to get VA claims ap­proved.

The law re­quired that the VA tell a vet­er­an what to do to prove a claim, help the vet­er­an ob­tain ne­ces­sary re­cords, and in­form the vet­er­an when the VA could not ob­tain the in­form­a­tion it needed. The law re­quired the VA to re­trieve the vet­er­an’s ser­vice med­ic­al re­cords and provide ex­ams when the VA did not have suf­fi­cient evid­ence to sub­stan­ti­ate a claim.

But the law was am­bigu­ous and left much open to in­ter­pret­a­tion, which had to be fought out in the courts. It wound up adding sev­er­al ad­di­tion­al lay­ers of bur­eau­cracy to an already clunky VA claims pro­cess without ap­pro­pri­at­ing ad­di­tion­al funds or hu­man re­sources to man­age the in­creased work­load.

“So the situ­ation wasn’t get­ting bet­ter; it just ad­ded an­oth­er for­um that made it harder to get things done,” said Sher­man Gil­lums, an as­so­ci­ate ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or with Para­lyzed Vet­er­ans of Amer­ica. “We at­trib­ute a lot of the early trouble — not the cur­rent back­log, but early trouble — to this, be­cause it cre­ated an in­sti­tu­tion­al lazi­ness or in­sti­tu­tion­al in­ef­fi­ciency and made that a part of the cul­ture at the VA. People just ac­cep­ted claims sit­ting around a long time be­cause they had to do all of this oth­er stuff.

“So if there is a snow­ball in all of this, I would say that’s the little tiny thing that would even­tu­ally be­come the ava­lanche,” he said.

Pres­id­ent George W. Bush

The Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion sent troops to Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan, but when those troops came home in­jured, the De­fense De­part­ment failed to ad­equately com­mu­nic­ate it to the en­tity tasked with help­ing them.

Early on, the de­part­ment was pub­licly count­ing only about a third of the cas­u­al­ties stem­ming from the War on Ter­ror. That was be­cause the De­part­ment was only count­ing ser­vice­men and wo­men im­me­di­ately tar­geted in the de­part­ment’s wounded-in-ac­tion stat­ist­ics. That ac­count­ing meth­od left out those who were not tar­geted but were wounded non­ethe­less, such as troops in­jured when they were rid­ing two trucks back from one that was hit by a road­side bomb, or those hurt in train­ing or trans­port­a­tion. (Tom Pen­ning­ton/Getty Im­ages)

The un­der­re­port­ing made it more dif­fi­cult for the VA to pre­pare for the com­ing in­flux of re­quests for help. The poor shar­ing of in­form­a­tion — in­clud­ing med­ic­al re­cords — between the two agen­cies has long been a bone of con­ten­tion, and it re­mains a chal­lenge (al­beit one that is im­prov­ing) to this day.

“It’s not sur­pris­ing, really, that the VA ended up be­ing poorly pre­pared for what happened, giv­en the way that they were plan­ning,” said Har­vard Kennedy School’s Bilmes. “There was ab­so­lutely a lack of plan­ning, a lack of ca­pa­city for plan­ning. … They didn’t know what hit them. They were com­pletely over­whelmed.”

Ad­di­tion­ally, the VA’s claims-pro­cessing time skyrock­eted early in the Bush years. In 2002, it took the VA an av­er­age of 224 days to com­plete claims, as com­pared with 166 days in 1999.

VA lead­er­ship

While the de­part­ment was hampered by plenty of ex­tern­al factors, it is hardly an in­no­cent vic­tim. VA lead­er­ship al­lowed its prob­lems to fester and its in­fra­struc­ture to crumble.

For ex­ample, the VA did not have a di­git­al way to pro­cess claims na­tion­wide un­til 2013, in­stead re­ly­ing on an in­ef­fi­cient pa­per fil­ing sys­tem. By com­par­is­on, the IRS rolled out its elec­tron­ic fil­ing sys­tem across the coun­try — al­beit with some prob­lems — in 1990.

It’s just one area where the de­part­ment was too slow to re­act to changes in the world around it.

Even by the mid-2000s, sev­er­al years after 9/11, the VA was us­ing out-of-date claims pro­jec­tions it had based on in­jury es­tim­ates that used as­sump­tions from older wars. Due to med­ic­al ad­vances, many ser­vice mem­bers who would have died from their in­jur­ies in past wars are now be­ing saved. That means few­er deaths, but it also means more wounded vet­er­ans, a de­vel­op­ment the de­part­ment failed to an­ti­cip­ate and was slow to ad­apt to.

And VA lead­ers at times failed to re­quest the fund­ing needed to do their duty.

In 2005, un­der VA Sec­ret­ary Jim Nich­olson, after ori­gin­ally deny­ing its fisc­al pre­dic­a­ment, it came out that the VA faced a $3 bil­lion short­fall in fund­ing for vet­er­ans health care. The situ­ation re­quired emer­gency sup­ple­ment­al fund­ing from Con­gress.

“There was a lead­er­ship at­ti­tude that was not ag­gress­ive in push­ing back against whatever ad­min­is­tra­tion, “¦ or even quietly go­ing to Con­gress and say­ing we need more people,” said Ger­ald Man­ar, na­tion­al vet­er­ans ser­vice deputy dir­ect­or at the Vet­er­ans of For­eign Wars and a former 30-year VA em­ploy­ee.

Kennedy to Nix­on to George H.W. Bush — and every pres­id­ent in between

In many ways, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is pay­ing for the neg­li­gence of past ad­min­is­tra­tions, dat­ing all the way back to Pres­id­ent John F. Kennedy, who au­thor­ized the dec­ade-long use of Agent Or­ange in Vi­et­nam.

But it wasn’t just Kennedy. Un­der Pres­id­ent John­son, Agent Or­ange was the dom­in­ant chem­ic­al used dur­ing the war. Pres­id­ent Nix­on hal­ted its use, but a long line of pres­id­ents either re­fused to ac­know­ledge the dam­age done or failed to ad­dress it.

“Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans have al­lowed this fes­ter­ing sore to con­tin­ue.”

Pres­id­ent Carter’s VA cre­ated the Agent Or­ange re­gistry, where vet­er­ans who were wor­ried about po­ten­tial side ef­fects could be ex­amined. But four years later, a GAO re­port found that 55 per­cent of re­spond­ents felt that the VA’s Agent Or­ange ex­am­in­a­tions either wer­en’t thor­ough or they re­ceived little or no in­form­a­tion on what long-term health im­pacts ex­pos­ure could cause.

And Pres­id­ent Re­agan’s leg­acy in­cludes a damning con­gres­sion­al re­port from 1990 that found: “The Re­agan ad­min­is­tra­tion had ad­op­ted a leg­al strategy of re­fus­ing li­ab­il­ity in mil­it­ary and ci­vil­ian cases of con­tam­in­a­tion in­volving tox­ic chem­ic­als and nuc­le­ar ra­di­ation. … The Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment has sup­pressed or min­im­ized find­ings of ill health ef­fects among Vi­et­nam vet­er­ans that could be linked to Agent Or­ange ex­pos­ure.”

Pro­gress has been slow. Vi­et­nam vet­er­ans won a ma­jor vic­tory un­der Pres­id­ent George H.W. Bush when Con­gress passed le­gis­la­tion al­low­ing the VA sec­ret­ary to make cer­tain dis­eases, in­clud­ing Hodgkin’s dis­ease and non-Hodgkin’s lymph­oma, “pre­sumptive” to Agent Or­ange ex­pos­ure. This means that the VA auto­mat­ic­ally as­sumes the dis­eases are re­lated to the de­fo­li­ant that the vet­er­ans en­countered dur­ing their mil­it­ary ser­vice, mak­ing it easi­er for them to col­lect dis­ab­il­ity pay­ments. 

The gov­ern­ment’s long-stand­ing fail­ure to ad­dress the dam­age done to vet­er­ans by Agent Or­ange mir­rors the lar­ger fail­ure of the VA. It spans gen­er­a­tions and party af­fil­i­ations, and every ef­fort to fix it comes with un­in­ten­ded con­sequences.

“This goes across party lines,” said Ron­ald Ab­rams, the joint ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or with the Na­tion­al Vet­er­ans Leg­al Ser­vices Pro­gram, and a former VA of­fi­cial who has worked on vet­er­ans claims cases for 40 years. “Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans have al­lowed this fes­ter­ing sore to con­tin­ue.”

Com­ing Soon: What Would It Take to Really Fix the VA?

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4957) }}

President Obama

Obama’s ex­per­i­ence with the VA is a test­a­ment to the danger of big prom­ises — and high ex­pect­a­tions.

He pledged to end the claims back­log while sim­ul­tan­eously mak­ing a string of moves that summoned a flood of new claims to the de­part­ment. (JEW­EL SA­MAD/AFP/Getty Im­ages)

The ad­min­is­tra­tion made it easi­er for vet­er­ans to get com­pens­a­tion for both post-trau­mat­ic stress dis­order and ex­pos­ure to Agent Or­ange — a Vi­et­nam War-era de­fo­li­ant now tied to a long list of neur­o­lo­gic­al dis­orders. Those moves ex­ten­ded help to long-suf­fer­ing vet­er­ans, but they wer­en’t matched by the VA re­forms needed to ad­equately ad­dress the new claims. Agent Or­ange alone took up 37 per­cent of the Vet­er­ans Be­ne­fits Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s claims-pro­cessing re­sources na­tion­ally from Oc­to­ber 2010 to March 2012, ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port.

And as claims soared dur­ing Obama’s first years in of­fice, so did wait times. In 2009, there were about 423,000 claims at the VA, with 150,000 claims pending for more than four months (the of­fi­cial wait time it takes a claim to be con­sidered “back­logged”). By 2012, claims had ex­ploded to more than 883,000 — and 586,540 of those sat on the VA’s back­log list.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion did re­quest — and get from Con­gress — ad­di­tion­al fund­ing for the de­part­ment. The VA’s budget totaled $100 bil­lion in 2009. In 2014, it was up to $154 bil­lion. But that money doesn’t in­stantly trans­fer in­to an ex­pan­ded ca­pa­city to meet vet­er­ans’ needs: It takes ap­prox­im­ately two years to fully train a claims work­er; the blame for the staff crunch doesn’t rest on Obama’s shoulders alone.

The in­flux of claims has since fallen, and the back­log is greatly di­min­ished — though there is con­tro­versy over how the ad­min­is­tra­tion has dealt with the claims. (For more on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s struggle to fix the VA, see Part One.)

“As a can­did­ate, Barack Obama prom­ised vet­er­ans the moon, but in many cases he hasn’t de­livered as pres­id­ent,” said GOP Rep. Jeff Miller of Flor­ida, the chair­man of the House Vet­er­ans Af­fairs Com­mit­tee. “VA’s dis­ab­il­ity claims back­log grew to his­tor­ic levels on his watch. “¦ Can­did­ate Obama prom­ised the most trans­par­ent ad­min­is­tra­tion in his­tory, but his VA is a case study in how to stone­wall the press, the pub­lic, and Con­gress.”

Congress

Miller’s own branch of gov­ern­ment, however, can­not claim clean hands.

The VA could be over­hauled to bet­ter ad­dress the needs of mod­ern vet­er­ans, in­clud­ing re­forms to the way it pro­cesses claims, as­sesses the per­form­ance of its em­ploy­ees, and meas­ures its over­all per­form­ance. But put­ting many of those re­forms in place would re­quire an act of Con­gress — and thus far those haven’t happened.

In­stead, Con­gress has taken a more re­act­ive ap­proach. When in­cid­ents — such as the re­cent hos­pit­al deaths — cap­ture pub­lic at­ten­tion, law­makers hold hear­ings where they be­rate VA of­fi­cials with juicy sound bites they can later play back for their con­stitu­ents. It’s good polit­ic­al theat­er, but it’s un­clear that the pay­off is any­thing oth­er than polit­ic­al.

“Con­gress has been totally ex­as­per­ated by the VA’s in­ab­il­ity to get on top of the prob­lem for a long time,” said Linda Bilmes, a seni­or lec­turer in pub­lic policy at Har­vard Uni­versity’s Kennedy School. “But they haven’t been will­ing to really con­tem­plate any­thing oth­er than throw­ing more money at the prob­lem.”

Con­gress is tak­ing some le­gis­lat­ive steps now: The House is slated to vote this week on a VA ac­count­ab­il­ity bill to make it easi­er to fire seni­or ex­ec­ut­ives, and the latest VA fund­ing bill banned bo­nuses to de­part­ment ex­ec­ut­ives. But neither meas­ure con­tains changes on the struc­tur­al level. (Mark Wilson/Getty Im­ages)

And even when Con­gress has passed le­gis­la­tion aimed at im­prov­ing the de­part­ment, its re­cord of ef­fic­acy is mixed at best — es­pe­cially in terms of elim­in­at­ing the claims back­log.

In 2000, law­makers passed the Vet­er­ans Claims As­sist­ance Act. The law was signed by Pres­id­ent Clin­ton and was, by all ac­counts, a well-mean­ing at­tempt to make it easi­er for vet­er­ans to get VA claims ap­proved.

The law re­quired that the VA tell a vet­er­an what to do to prove a claim, help the vet­er­an ob­tain ne­ces­sary re­cords, and in­form the vet­er­an when the VA could not ob­tain the in­form­a­tion it needed. The law re­quired the VA to re­trieve the vet­er­an’s ser­vice med­ic­al re­cords and provide ex­ams when the VA did not have suf­fi­cient evid­ence to sub­stan­ti­ate a claim.

But the law was am­bigu­ous and left much open to in­ter­pret­a­tion, which had to be fought out in the courts. It wound up adding sev­er­al ad­di­tion­al lay­ers of bur­eau­cracy to an already clunky VA claims pro­cess without ap­pro­pri­at­ing ad­di­tion­al funds or hu­man re­sources to man­age the in­creased work­load.

“So the situ­ation wasn’t get­ting bet­ter; it just ad­ded an­oth­er for­um that made it harder to get things done,” said Sher­man Gil­lums, an as­so­ci­ate ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or with Para­lyzed Vet­er­ans of Amer­ica. “We at­trib­ute a lot of the early trouble — not the cur­rent back­log, but early trouble — to this, be­cause it cre­ated an in­sti­tu­tion­al lazi­ness or in­sti­tu­tion­al in­ef­fi­ciency and made that a part of the cul­ture at the VA. People just ac­cep­ted claims sit­ting around a long time be­cause they had to do all of this oth­er stuff.

“So if there is a snow­ball in all of this, I would say that’s the little tiny thing that would even­tu­ally be­come the ava­lanche,” he said.

President George W. Bush

The Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion sent troops to Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan, but when those troops came home in­jured, the De­fense De­part­ment failed to ad­equately com­mu­nic­ate it to the en­tity tasked with help­ing them.

Early on, the de­part­ment was pub­licly count­ing only about a third of the cas­u­al­ties stem­ming from the War on Ter­ror. That was be­cause the De­part­ment was only count­ing ser­vice­men and wo­men im­me­di­ately tar­geted in the de­part­ment’s wounded-in-ac­tion stat­ist­ics. That ac­count­ing meth­od left out those who were not tar­geted but were wounded non­ethe­less, such as troops in­jured when they were rid­ing two trucks back from one that was hit by a road­side bomb, or those hurt in train­ing or trans­port­a­tion. (Tom Pen­ning­ton/Getty Im­ages)

The un­der­re­port­ing made it more dif­fi­cult for the VA to pre­pare for the com­ing in­flux of re­quests for help. The poor shar­ing of in­form­a­tion — in­clud­ing med­ic­al re­cords — between the two agen­cies has long been a bone of con­ten­tion, and it re­mains a chal­lenge (al­beit one that is im­prov­ing) to this day.

“It’s not sur­pris­ing, really, that the VA ended up be­ing poorly pre­pared for what happened, giv­en the way that they were plan­ning,” said Har­vard Kennedy School’s Bilmes. “There was ab­so­lutely a lack of plan­ning, a lack of ca­pa­city for plan­ning. … They didn’t know what hit them. They were com­pletely over­whelmed.”

Ad­di­tion­ally, the VA’s claims-pro­cessing time skyrock­eted early in the Bush years. In 2002, it took the VA an av­er­age of 224 days to com­plete claims, as com­pared with 166 days in 1999.

VA leadership

While the de­part­ment was hampered by plenty of ex­tern­al factors, it is hardly an in­no­cent vic­tim. VA lead­er­ship al­lowed its prob­lems to fester and its in­fra­struc­ture to crumble.

For ex­ample, the VA did not have a di­git­al way to pro­cess claims na­tion­wide un­til 2013, in­stead re­ly­ing on an in­ef­fi­cient pa­per fil­ing sys­tem. By com­par­is­on, the IRS rolled out its elec­tron­ic fil­ing sys­tem across the coun­try — al­beit with some prob­lems — in 1990.

It’s just one area where the de­part­ment was too slow to re­act to changes in the world around it.

Even by the mid-2000s, sev­er­al years after 9/11, the VA was us­ing out-of-date claims pro­jec­tions it had based on in­jury es­tim­ates that used as­sump­tions from older wars. Due to med­ic­al ad­vances, many ser­vice mem­bers who would have died from their in­jur­ies in past wars are now be­ing saved. That means few­er deaths, but it also means more wounded vet­er­ans, a de­vel­op­ment the de­part­ment failed to an­ti­cip­ate and was slow to ad­apt to.

And VA lead­ers at times failed to re­quest the fund­ing needed to do their duty.

In 2005, un­der VA Sec­ret­ary Jim Nich­olson, after ori­gin­ally deny­ing its fisc­al pre­dic­a­ment, it came out that the VA faced a $3 bil­lion short­fall in fund­ing for vet­er­ans health care. The situ­ation re­quired emer­gency sup­ple­ment­al fund­ing from Con­gress.

“There was a lead­er­ship at­ti­tude that was not ag­gress­ive in push­ing back against whatever ad­min­is­tra­tion, “¦ or even quietly go­ing to Con­gress and say­ing we need more people,” said Ger­ald Man­ar, na­tion­al vet­er­ans ser­vice deputy dir­ect­or at the Vet­er­ans of For­eign Wars and a former 30-year VA em­ploy­ee.

Kennedy to Nixon to George H.W. Bush — and every president in between

In many ways, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is pay­ing for the neg­li­gence of past ad­min­is­tra­tions, dat­ing all the way back to Pres­id­ent John F. Kennedy, who au­thor­ized the dec­ade-long use of Agent Or­ange in Vi­et­nam.

But it wasn’t just Kennedy. Un­der Pres­id­ent John­son, Agent Or­ange was the dom­in­ant chem­ic­al used dur­ing the war. Pres­id­ent Nix­on hal­ted its use, but a long line of pres­id­ents either re­fused to ac­know­ledge the dam­age done or failed to ad­dress it.

“Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans have al­lowed this fes­ter­ing sore to con­tin­ue.”

Pres­id­ent Carter’s VA cre­ated the Agent Or­ange re­gistry, where vet­er­ans who were wor­ried about po­ten­tial side ef­fects could be ex­amined. But four years later, a GAO re­port found that 55 per­cent of re­spond­ents felt that the VA’s Agent Or­ange ex­am­in­a­tions either wer­en’t thor­ough or they re­ceived little or no in­form­a­tion on what long-term health im­pacts ex­pos­ure could cause.

And Pres­id­ent Re­agan’s leg­acy in­cludes a damning con­gres­sion­al re­port from 1990 that found: “The Re­agan ad­min­is­tra­tion had ad­op­ted a leg­al strategy of re­fus­ing li­ab­il­ity in mil­it­ary and ci­vil­ian cases of con­tam­in­a­tion in­volving tox­ic chem­ic­als and nuc­le­ar ra­di­ation. … The Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment has sup­pressed or min­im­ized find­ings of ill health ef­fects among Vi­et­nam vet­er­ans that could be linked to Agent Or­ange ex­pos­ure.”

Pro­gress has been slow. Vi­et­nam vet­er­ans won a ma­jor vic­tory un­der Pres­id­ent George H.W. Bush when Con­gress passed le­gis­la­tion al­low­ing the VA sec­ret­ary to make cer­tain dis­eases, in­clud­ing Hodgkin’s dis­ease and non-Hodgkin’s lymph­oma, “pre­sumptive” to Agent Or­ange ex­pos­ure. This means that the VA auto­mat­ic­ally as­sumes the dis­eases are re­lated to the de­fo­li­ant that the vet­er­ans en­countered dur­ing their mil­it­ary ser­vice, mak­ing it easi­er for them to col­lect dis­ab­il­ity pay­ments. 

The gov­ern­ment’s long-stand­ing fail­ure to ad­dress the dam­age done to vet­er­ans by Agent Or­ange mir­rors the lar­ger fail­ure of the VA. It spans gen­er­a­tions and party af­fil­i­ations, and every ef­fort to fix it comes with un­in­ten­ded con­sequences.

“This goes across party lines,” said Ron­ald Ab­rams, the joint ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or with the Na­tion­al Vet­er­ans Leg­al Ser­vices Pro­gram, and a former VA of­fi­cial who has worked on vet­er­ans claims cases for 40 years. “Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans have al­lowed this fes­ter­ing sore to con­tin­ue.”

Com­ing Soon: What Would It Take to Really Fix the VA?

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4957) }}

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×