Key Nations Huddle on Iran Nuclear Standoff

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
May 1, 2014, 7:47 a.m.

Ne­go­ti­at­ors for six ma­jor gov­ern­ments con­ferred on how to haggle with Ir­an over atom­ic as­sets of po­ten­tial use to build nuc­le­ar bombs, Re­u­ters re­ports.

The five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many dis­cussed the mat­ter at a high-level gath­er­ing on Wed­nes­day in Brus­sels, Bel­gi­um, less than two weeks be­fore they are ex­pec­ted to join Ir­an to be­gin for­mu­lat­ing the core com­pon­ents of a pos­sible long-term atom­ic set­tle­ment. The six powers are seek­ing to rein in ef­forts that could en­able the Per­sian Gulf power to con­struct nuc­le­ar arms, though Tehran main­tains its atom­ic activ­it­ies are solely peace­ful.

Par­ti­cipants offered no spe­cif­ics on the latest meet­ing of en­voys from China, France, Ger­many, Rus­sia, the United King­dom and the United States.

A spokes­wo­man for European Uni­on for­eign policy chief Cath­er­ine Ashton, though, said the ses­sion was “use­ful.” Ashton has com­mu­nic­ated with Tehran on be­half of the “P-5+1” powers.

An en­voy tied to the six na­tions cited a “need to elab­or­ate our po­s­i­tions” for the ne­go­ti­ations, which are set to re­sume with Ir­an on May 13 in Vi­enna. Sev­er­al sig­ni­fic­ant dif­fer­ences re­main between Tehran and the oth­er ne­go­ti­at­ing gov­ern­ments, though the sides re­cently ap­peared to achieve trac­tion in a dis­pute over an un­fin­ished Ir­a­ni­an heavy-wa­ter re­act­or cap­able of gen­er­at­ing bomb-us­able plutoni­um.

Speak­ing an­onym­ously, one dip­lo­mat sug­ges­ted a dis­agree­ment over Ir­an’s urani­um-en­rich­ment ca­pa­city would re­main un­re­solved un­til “Ju­ly 19 in the even­ing,” when an in­ter­im atom­ic deal reached in Novem­ber is set to ex­pire.

Ir­an is cur­rently us­ing roughly 10,000 cent­ri­fuges to re­fine urani­um, a pro­cess cap­able of gen­er­at­ing peace­ful ma­ter­i­al as well as nuc­le­ar-bomb fuel. The United States and its al­lies would likely seek to re­duce Tehran’s quant­ity of the ma­chines to no more than a few thou­sand, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters.

Mean­while, Ir­a­ni­an me­dia said Tehran has re­ceived all $4.2 bil­lion in seized rev­en­ue it was prom­ised un­der the six-month in­ter­im pact, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­por­ted on Thursday.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×