A senator pressed to eliminate a planned cut to New York City disaster-response funds after President Obama alluded to possible nuclear threats to Manhattan.
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) lashed the federal government on Wednesday for proposing to cut local “Securing the Cities” funding by more than half in fiscal 2015, dropping the annual budget from $11 million to $4.7 million. The program began in 2006 as a pilot initiative to bolster New York City’s defenses against nuclear or radiological attacks, and has since expanded to the Los Angeles area.
The Homeland Security Department “must recognize the problem with their decision and reverse it immediately,” Schumer said in a press release. The statement says the proposed funding reduction would “deal a major blow” to radiation-sensor activities by local law enforcement.
The plea came a day after Obama said that concerns about Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region are minimal when compared with the danger of a possible nuclear strike.
“Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors,” Obama said on the second day of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague, Netherlands. “I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan.”
In a clarification, the White House on Wednesday said Obama was not referring to any specific threat to New York City.
“The president was not discussing intelligence,” National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said in an e-mail to Bloomberg.
Still, Schumer seized on the president’s remark in his released comments.
“As President Obama correctly noted, our biggest fear is a nuclear weapon going off in New York City, so why would DHS want to cut funding for such a vital program here?” the senator said.
What We're Following See More »
Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."
- A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
- A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
- And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.
According to an online tracking poll released by New Latino Voice, Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump among Latino voters, attracting support from 81 percent of Latino voters, to just 12 percent support for Trump. The results of this poll are consistent with those from a series of other surveys conducted by various organizations. With Pew Research predicting the 2016 electorate will be 12 percent Hispanic, which would be the highest ever, Trump could be in serious trouble if he can't close the gap.