‘Significant’ Alterations Seen in Updated B-61 Bomb: Report

Technicians prepare a B-61 nuclear gravity bomb for inspection at the Pantex Plant in Texas. An issue expert on Friday said a developmental variant of the weapon includes notable alterations.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
Feb. 28, 2014, 10:16 a.m.

De­vel­op­ment­al up­dates to a U.S. nuc­le­ar grav­ity bomb in­clude “sig­ni­fic­ant” al­ter­a­tions to key weapon com­pon­ents, says a new in­de­pend­ent re­port.

The B-61 bomb’s “Mod 12” vari­ant in­cor­por­ates a fully re­vamped back sec­tion, and lacks the para­chute in­cor­por­ated in pre­de­cessors, ac­cord­ing to the Fri­day im­age ana­lys­is by Hans Kristensen, dir­ect­or of the Nuc­le­ar In­form­a­tion Pro­ject at the Fed­er­a­tion of Amer­ic­an Sci­ent­ists.

The altered weapon’s Air Force-de­veloped “tail kit” is de­signed to im­prove its tar­get­ing pre­ci­sion. Kristensen wrote that the new vari­ant’s ex­act ac­cur­acy re­mains un­cer­tain, but there is a roughly 98-foot mar­gin of er­ror in non-nuc­le­ar weapons fit­ted with the In­tern­al Nav­ig­a­tion Sys­tem thought to be in­cluded in the forth­com­ing B-61 bomb up­date.

“Even if [the pre­ci­sion] were a little less for the B-61-12, it is still a sig­ni­fic­ant im­prove­ment of the [360- to 590-foot] ac­cur­acy that nuc­le­ar grav­ity bombs nor­mally achieve in test drops,” Kristensen wrote in his as­sess­ment, pub­lished on the FAS Stra­tegic Se­cur­ity blog.

Bombs re­fur­bished un­der the U.S. B-61 life-ex­ten­sion pro­gram are slated for de­ploy­ment in sev­er­al al­lied NATO states in Europe, re­pla­cing older ver­sions. Kristensen wrote that des­pite plans to re­vamp the weapons with new det­on­a­tion fea­tures and com­pon­ents to in­crease their ac­cur­acy, law­makers in Bel­gi­um and the Neth­er­lands said Wash­ing­ton had not aler­ted them to “the up­com­ing de­ploy­ment of im­proved nuc­le­ar cap­ab­il­it­ies in their coun­tries.”

“The [Bel­gian and Dutch] gov­ern­ment po­s­i­tion is that there is no im­prove­ment and there­fore no need to in­form any­one,” he wrote.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×