Republican lawmakers are asserting that President Obama took too long to inform U.S. allies of a possible Russian treaty violation.
The Obama administration notified other NATO nations earlier this month of the potential breach involving Russian cruise-missile tests that began as long ago as 2008. The U.S. State Department on Thursday confirmed it had expressed concern to Moscow about the possible violation, the New York Times reported.
In a Thursday letter to Obama, Representative Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said details on the potential breach of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty should have been available to NATO nations as they crafted a 2012 nuclear-strategy review.
“Your administration called upon NATO to undertake the 2012 Deterrence and Defense Posture Review (DDPR) in an effort to analyze the current threat environment and ensure that the alliance’s nuclear posture is designed to meet those threats,” Turner’s letter states.
The U.S. “failure to disclose this critical information to NATO during the review process both compromises the DDPR and weakens the trust our allies place in us,” the lawmaker added.
The same concern comes up in a Thursday joint statement by Turner and three other GOP lawmakers: House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), Vice Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), and Strategic Forces Subcommittee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.).
“Intermediate-range missiles threaten our European partners most of all,” the release says. “Why were they kept in the dark for four years according to this [Times] report? Why did the Obama administration keep evidence of Russia’s cheating from our allies when NATO was recently debating and deciding upon its nuclear posture?”
To date, Washington has not formally accused Moscow of violating the 1987 pact.
What We're Following See More »
“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.
Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.