Europeans Nervous About Syria Chemical-Destruction Safety

Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 23, 2014, 6:47 a.m.

Greece wants ab­so­lute guar­an­tees that des­troy­ing Syr­ia’s war­fare chem­ic­als would not en­danger the Medi­ter­ranean, the Xin­hua News Agency re­ports.

Athens is not alone in its nervous­ness about the plan for elim­in­at­ing Dam­as­cus chem­ic­als; Brit­ish cit­izens also are be­gin­ning to voice safety con­cerns re­lated to their na­tion’s in­volve­ment in the pro­cess.

Greek For­eign Min­is­ter Evan­gelos Ven­izelos asked EU for­eign policy chief Cath­er­ine Ashton to de­mand the guar­an­tees from the United Na­tions and the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons. The two or­gan­iz­a­tions are over­see­ing ef­forts to elim­in­ate the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment’s chem­ic­al-war­fare stock­pile by the end of June.

Emma Bonino, Evan­gelos’ Itali­an equi­val­ent, “agreed on the send­ing of a let­ter to the dir­ect­or of the OP­CW,” the Greek For­eign Min­istry ad­ded in a state­ment on Wed­nes­day.

The Syr­i­an chem­ic­al ar­sen­al’s dead­li­est com­pon­ents are be­ing trans­por­ted through the vi­ol­ence-wracked na­tion to coastal city of Latakia, where they are to be loaded on Dan­ish and Nor­we­gi­an trans­port ships. The chem­ic­als then would travel un­der in­ter­na­tion­al es­cort to an Itali­an port, where they would enter the cus­tody of a U.S. ves­sel equipped to des­troy them.

Greece is seek­ing con­firm­a­tion that there is “no doubt … as to the se­cur­ity and pro­tec­tion of the Medi­ter­ranean en­vir­on­ment dur­ing the pro­cess of the trans­port­ing and de­struc­tion of Syr­i­an chem­ic­al weapons,” the Greek For­eign Min­istry said.

In earli­er dis­cus­sions with Green­peace, Ocean­ica and the World Wild­life Fund, OCPW Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Ah­met Üzüm­cü as­ser­ted that the de­struc­tion ef­fort would not drop any byproducts in­to the Medi­ter­ranean Sea. Rep­res­ent­at­ives of the watch­dog groups con­veyed that prom­ise to Ven­izelos on Wed­nes­day, ac­cord­ing to the min­istry state­ment.

Mean­while, pe­ti­tion­ers in the United King­dom have gathered nearly 400 sig­na­tures in op­pos­i­tion to the planned elim­in­a­tion of less-dan­ger­ous Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-arms in­gredi­ents at Ellesmere Port, the Liv­er­pool Echo re­por­ted.

The pres­id­ent of Syr­ia, Bashar As­sad, ad­mit­ted his gov­ern­ment’s pos­ses­sion of chem­ic­al weapons and agreed to elim­in­ate them after Dam­as­cus was blamed for a nerve-gas strike al­legedly res­ult­ing in more than 1,400 ci­vil­ian deaths last Au­gust.

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.