Destruction Deadline for Syria’s Deadliest Chemicals May Be Missed

Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 17, 2014, 7:07 a.m.

In­ter­na­tion­al au­thor­it­ies may fall short of their aim to des­troy Syr­ia’s most haz­ard­ous war­fare chem­ic­als be­fore April, Re­u­ters re­ports.

Trans­port­ing the top-pri­or­ity sub­stances to the Syr­i­an coast from loc­a­tions across the war-di­vided coun­try has proven “quite chal­len­ging,” said Ah­met Üzüm­cü, dir­ect­or gen­er­al of the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons.

His agency wants Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s full chem­ic­al ar­sen­al des­troyed by the middle of this year. Dis­arm­a­ment per­son­nel have fo­cused first on re­mov­ing As­sad’s mus­tard blister agent and in­gredi­ents for sar­in and VX nerve agents. These are to be des­troyed on a spe­cially equipped U.S. ship.

When ques­tioned dir­ectly on wheth­er the agency would meet the goal of elim­in­at­ing the “pri­or­ity” sub­stances by March 31, Üzüm­cü noted that crews were un­able to re­move the ma­ter­i­als by the end of Decem­ber, as ini­tially planned.

“From my point of view what is im­port­ant is really the end [dead­line] of June 2014, so we will do our best to meet it,” he said.

In com­ments is­sued af­ter­ward, the chem­ic­al-dis­arm­a­ment watch­dog agency said Üzüm­cü “re­mains con­fid­ent the dead­line of 30 June 2014 for des­troy­ing Syr­ia’s en­tire ar­sen­al of chem­ic­al weapons can be met.”

Elab­or­at­ing on the op­er­a­tion’s dif­fi­culty, Üzüm­cü said “the biggest area of con­cern is clearly the safe trans­port­a­tion of those weapons, chem­ic­al sub­stances, from the sites in Syr­ia to the port of Latakia.”

One West­ern en­voy said a Dan­ish trans­port ves­sel has so far taken cus­tody of just one-twen­ti­eth of the sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­als. The pri­or­ity chem­ic­als even­tu­ally are slated to trans­fer onto a U.S. chem­ic­al-de­struc­tion ves­sel at Gioia Tauro, Italy.

Üzüm­cü said “some ad­di­tion­al meas­ures are be­ing taken right now to re­duce risks,” and noted he had met with Syr­i­an of­fi­cials on Wed­nes­day to dis­cuss pro­tec­tion of the war­fare chem­ic­als.

“We hope that we can move re­l­at­ively quickly in the com­ing weeks,” he said.

Mean­while, the United King­dom on Thursday an­nounced it would hire a French firm to burn a sep­ar­ate cache of less dan­ger­ous Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-arms in­gredi­ents at a fa­cil­ity near Liv­er­pool, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×