Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

For Obama, There Are No Winners or Losers—but There Are Villains For Obama, There Are No Winners or Losers—but There Are Villains

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


For Obama, There Are No Winners or Losers—but There Are Villains

Spoiler alert: It’s House Republicans. And the president wants them to play nice for the rest of the year.


On Thursday, President Obama speaks about the reopening of the U.S. government.(SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

Now that the government has opened and the threat of default is off the table, some are wondering what the first shutdown in 17 years was for. A majority of Americans are fed up with Washington—and its leaders. In the shutdown's aftermath, those leaders are being neatly sorted into two groups: winners and losers.

For President Obama, however, no one won or lost, and there wasn't any economic rationale for the shutdown, either. "At a moment when our economic recovery demands more jobs, more momentum, we've got yet another self-inflicted crisis that set our economy back," he said in a speech from the State Dining Room on Thursday morning. "And for what?"


But there are villains. "Had one side not decided to pursue a strategy of brinksmanship, each side could have gotten together and figured out how do we shape a budget that provides certainty to businesses and people who rely on government, provides certainty to investors and our economy, and we'd be growing faster right now," Obama said.

That side is House Republicans, and the president is worried they will continue to block legislation for the rest of the year. He pointed to an immigration bill passed by the Senate earlier this year that is awaiting a House vote:

The majority of Americans think this is the right thing to do. And it's sitting there waiting for the House to pass it. Now, if the House has ideas on how to improve the Senate bill, let's hear them. Let's start the negotiations. But let's not leave this problem to keep festering for another year or two years or three years. This can and should get done by the end of this year.


And a Senate-approved $500 billion farm bill that has been repeatedly delayed by House Republicans:

Again, the Senate's already passed a solid bipartisan bill. It's got support from Democrats and Republicans. It's sitting in the House waiting for passage. If House Republicans have ideas that they think would improve the farm bill, let's see them. Let's negotiate. What are we waiting for? Let's get this done.

The president's remarks suggest that Americans haven't seen the last of Republican-led blocks to legislation in 2013. But Obama wants the House GOP to know it's on thin ice with the White House. And he's not alone: A majority of Americans blame Republicans for the shutdown, and the party's popularity has hit a record low. Moving forward, getting a head start on negotiations—and maybe even budging on some these issues—may not be a bad idea for the Grand Old Party.

comments powered by Disqus