Here’s What Happens When You Play Politics with the Bergdahl Swap

What if the White House had chosen a low-key announcement of the Bowe Bergdahl swap?

National Journal
Ron Fournier
June 4, 2014, 6:18 a.m.

The best meas­ure of wheth­er Pres­id­ent Obama cut a smart deal to free Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl is what hap­pens to the five Guantanamo Bay ter­ror­ists he traded away. Do they go (a) in­to re­tire­ment; (b) in­to battle against the United States; (c) or in­to five cold graves?

The rest of what you’re hear­ing about the swap is polit­ics ““ thinly dis­guised as a leg­al and for­eign policy de­bate. Un­less you can pre­dict the fu­ture, the smart move on such a com­plex story is to avoid an ab­so­lut­ist po­s­i­tion.

Here’s what hap­pen when you don’t:

The White House has un­der­mined its cred­ib­il­ity ““ again ““by con­fus­ing gov­ern­ing with cam­paign­ing. It was no secret that the Taliban’s cap­ture of Ber­g­dahl was com­plic­ated by evid­ence that he aban­doned his unit. Many people in gov­ern­ment long con­sidered the sol­dier a desert­er or trait­or. Still, the United States had a mor­al ob­lig­a­tion to seek Bergh­dal’s free­dom and a na­tion­al se­cur­ity im­per­at­ive to get him in­to the mil­it­ary justice sys­tem, where any com­pli­city with the Taliban would be ex­posed, mit­ig­ated and pun­ished. Little about the case was un­am­bigu­ous.

All too typ­ic­ally, White House of­fi­cials dis­missed the grays and painted a black-and-white pic­ture, one with a front-and-cen­ter pose for their hero-pres­id­ent.

  • Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Susan Rice de­clared on ABC’s “This Week” that Ber­g­dahl served with “hon­or and dis­tinc­tion,” an eye­brow-raiser that evoked memor­ies of her Benghazi talk­ing points fiasco.
  • Ber­g­dahl’s par­ents were summoned to a Rose Garden ce­re­mony that only a laugh­ably in­com­pet­ent com­mu­nic­a­tions team wouldn’t re­cog­nize as a pub­lic re­la­tions risk.
  • The White House failed to no­ti­fy Con­gress in ad­vance of the swap, as re­quired by law. Pres­id­en­tial aides called it an “over­sight.” Over­look­ing something as ba­sic as a con­gres­sion­al head’s up? It’s hard to be­lieve that seni­or pres­id­en­tial ad­visers could be that in­com­pet­ent, but the only oth­er al­tern­at­ive is that they’re ly­ing.

What if the White House had chosen a low-key an­nounce­ment of the swap, pledging in a writ­ten state­ment to get to the bot­tom of Ber­g­dahl’s con­duct while keep­ing gun sights on the free ter­ror­ists? No spin. No cel­eb­ra­tions. No am­muni­tion for the GOP. My guess: This would be a 48-hour story, not a mush­room­ing polit­ic­al fight.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5004) }}

The Re­pub­lic­an Party looks hy­po­crit­ic­al, and risks over­reach­ing ““ again. Many Re­pub­lic­ans have been pres­sur­ing the White House to se­cure Ber­g­dahl’s re­lease, know­ing the most likely route would be via a pris­on­er swap. Sen. John Mc­Cain of Ari­zona, the failed 2008 GOP pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee, told CNN in Feb­ru­ary that he “would be in­clined to sup­port” an ex­change of pris­on­ers with the Taliban un­der the right cir­cum­stances. He is now con­demning the Ber­g­dahl deal, call­ing these the wrong cir­cum­stances.

Then there are the GOP news-whisper­ers. Buzzfeed re­por­ted Tues­day that a former ad­viser to Pres­id­ent George W. Bush and Mitt Rom­ney played a key role in pub­li­ciz­ing Ber­g­dahl’s crit­ics in the mil­it­ary.

The in­volve­ment of Richard Grenell, who once served as a key aide to Bush-era U.S. Am­bas­sad­or to the U.N. John Bolton and later worked for Rom­ney’s 2012 cam­paign, comes as the Ber­g­dahl re­lease has turned in­to an in­creas­ingly vi­cious par­tis­an is­sue.

The New York Times re­por­ted that “Re­pub­lic­an strategists” had ar­ranged an in­ter­view for them with men who served in Afgh­anistan with Ber­g­dahl, who was re­leased after five years of im­pris­on­ment by the Taliban in a con­tro­ver­sial pris­on­er swap deal. In the art­icle, the men ex­press their an­ger at Ber­g­dahl for leav­ing the base, caus­ing oth­er sol­diers to risk their lives look­ing for him.

The same sol­diers also did in­ter­views with The Weekly Stand­ard, the Daily Mail, the Wall Street Journ­al, and Fox News.

Cody Full, one of the sol­diers quoted in the New York Times and oth­er stor­ies, tweeted yes­ter­day about Grenell: “I want to thank @richard­grenell for help­ing get our pla­toon’s story out.” Grenell retweeted the tweet, call­ing Full a “true Amer­ic­an hero.”

Are there any straight shoot­ers in Wash­ing­ton? In the 24 hours since I warned against politi­ciz­ing this situ­ation (“What Your Opin­ion About the Ber­g­dahl Swap Says About Your Views To­ward Obama”), both parties re­ver­ted to course. Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats are stuck in per­petu­al cam­paign mode, treat­ing big na­tion­al prob­lems like elec­tion cam­paigns, where res­ults are by nature a zero-sum game: total vic­tory or total de­feat. Gov­ern­ing, when done right, is not so clean.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×