Why Assange Evades U.S. Charges While Manning Sits in Jail

Prosecuting Julian Assange would mean implicating the journalists who worked with him.

Julian Assange
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Nov. 26, 2013, 6:12 a.m.

From a U.S. leg­al stand­point, Ju­li­an As­sange made a smart move in 2010 — he de­cided to share his bounty of 500,000 leaked cables with tra­di­tion­al news out­lets like The Guard­i­an and The New York Times. Today, The Wash­ing­ton Post re­ports that As­sange is un­likely to face U.S. charges for his role in fa­cil­it­at­ing the greatest in­tel­li­gence leak in Amer­ic­an his­tory. Why? Be­cause do­ing so would im­plic­ate the journ­al­ists who worked with As­sange. The Post re­ports:

Justice of­fi­cials said they looked hard at As­sange but real­ized that they have what they de­scribed as a “New York Times prob­lem.” If the Justice De­part­ment in­dicted As­sange, it would also have to pro­sec­ute The New York Times and oth­er news or­gan­iz­a­tions and writers who pub­lished clas­si­fied ma­ter­i­al, in­clud­ing The Wash­ing­ton Post and Bri­tain’s Guard­i­an news­pa­per, ac­cord­ing to the of­fi­cials, who spoke on the con­di­tion of an­onym­ity to dis­cuss in­tern­al de­lib­er­a­tions.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has not been soft on leak­ers, and it has been cri­ti­cized for be­ing too ag­gress­ive with the press. But the gov­ern­ment makes a care­ful dis­tinc­tion here: Chelsea Man­ning and Ed­ward Snowden are clear crim­in­als. They leaked clas­si­fied doc­u­ments they swore not to re­lease. They did so be­cause of a sense of act­iv­ism. As­sange fa­cilil­ated, in Man­ning’s case, the leaks. But yet As­sange will not be charged with aid­ing the crime be­cause he was the mes­sen­ger, des­pite the fact that his in­tent to leak the doc­u­ments is also based in the same vein of protest or act­iv­ism as the oth­ers.

Bill Keller, the former Times ex­ec­ut­ive ed­it­or, wrote that As­sange was an “elu­sive, ma­nip­u­lat­ive, and volat­ile” part­ner to work with. His 2011 re­count of the epis­ode makes As­sange out to be more of an act­iv­ist seek­ing a mega­phone than a journ­al­ist who wants to un­cov­er the truth. For in­stance,  “He was angry that we de­clined to link our on­line cov­er­age of the War Logs to the WikiLeaks web­site,” Keller wrote, “a de­cision we made be­cause we feared — rightly, as it turned out — that its trove would con­tain the names of low-level in­form­ants and make them Taliban tar­gets.”

At sur­face level, one can ar­gue that As­sange is no dif­fer­ent from Man­ning and Snowden. But as The Post re­ports, “Justice of­fi­cials said [As­sange] would al­most cer­tainly not be pro­sec­uted for re­ceiv­ing clas­si­fied ma­ter­i­al from Man­ning.”

Which is to say, if you don’t want to be in­dicted for leak­ing in­form­a­tion, don’t steal the in­form­a­tion your­self.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×