Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Supreme Court Limits (but Doesn't End) Software Patents Supreme Court Limits (but Doesn't End) Software Patents

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Supreme Court Limits (but Doesn't End) Software Patents

Just adding a computer to an idea doesn't mean it's patentable, the court rules.

+

(UPI/Kevin Dietsch)

A unanimous Supreme Court narrowed the reach of software patents Thursday. 

The Court ruled that simply involving a computer in an idea doesn't mean it's patentable. The justices tossed out several patents belonging to Alice, an Australian financial services company, and the ruling could invalidate other similar patents.

 

But the Court didn't go as far as many patent critics had hoped, declining to strike down all software patents. Critics argue that a rise in litigation (especially over software patents) is suppressing innovation and limiting consumers' access to technology.

The Supreme Court has long ruled that "abstract" ideas are generally not patentable. Alice's patents covered a computer system for facilitating financial transactions. CLS Bank challenged the patents, and the high court agreed that a patentable invention must do more than just add a computer to an otherwise abstract idea.

"Merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the Court.

 

Google, Facebook, Amazon, and other technology giants had urged the Court to issue a broad ruling against software patents. In a brief to the Court, the companies wrote that abstract software patents "have become a plague on computer-related industries." 

Other companies, including Microsoft and Adobe, agreed that the Court should throw out Alice's patents, but warned against a sweeping blow against all software patents. Those companies said the Court had no reason to "risk the potential uncertainty and unforeseen impacts" by addressing the patentability of all software.

Ultimately, the Court was careful to craft a narrow ruling. Thomas wrote that "many computer-implemented claims are formally addressed to patent-eligible subject matter," but the Court offered little guidance on what kinds of software patents might still be valid.  

The ruling comes after the Senate abandoned legislation to crack down on "patent trolls"—firms that file frivolous patent claims to extort settlements out of companies. Many tech companies argue that patent trolls have become a drain on the economy.

 

This article appears in the June 20, 2014 edition of NJ Daily.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Love it - first thing I read in the morning."

Amy, VP of Communications

I read the Tech Edge every morning."

Ashley, Senior Media Associate

Sign up form for the newsletter
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
 
 
Make your Election Night headquarters.
See more ▲
 
Hide