Why We Can’t Name a Planet After Joe Biden — Yet

Astronomers have discovered a new dwarf planet. For now, they’re calling it “Biden.”

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
March 26, 2014, 2:11 p.m.

As­tro­nomers have dis­covered a pos­sible new dwarf plan­et: a cold, re­l­at­ively tiny lump of ice trav­el­ing near the bar­ri­er where the sun loses all its grav­it­a­tion­al in­flu­ence.

The plan­et — 280 miles in dia­met­er — is roughly the size of Wis­con­sin. And des­pite the plan­et’s re­l­at­ive small­ness, this dis­cov­ery has ig­nited as­tro­nomers’ ex­cite­ment: Its ex­ist­ence and or­bit may be able to tell us about the ori­gins of the sol­ar sys­tem.

But nev­er mind all that. More im­port­antly, the sci­ent­ists gave the plan­et a nick­name, and that name is “Biden.”

“The new­found ob­ject’s of­fi­cial name is 2012 VP113, but the dis­cov­ery team calls it VP for short, or just ‘Biden,’ ” the journ­al Nature, which pub­lished the find­ings, re­ports.

Then this happened (click the photo):

It will be some time be­fore the dwarf plan­et gets an of­fi­cial name. The In­ter­na­tion­al As­tro­nom­ic­al Uni­on needs iron-clad evid­ence that the ce­les­ti­al body does in fact ex­ist and ad­heres to the defin­i­tion of a dwarf plan­et.

But when it comes down to de­cid­ing, the plan­et’s name will not be Biden.

It won’t be for any fault in the vice pres­id­ent. Rather, ac­cord­ing to the IAU, “names for per­sons or events known primar­ily for their mil­it­ary or polit­ic­al activ­it­ies are ac­cept­able only after 100 years elapsed since the per­son died or the event oc­curred.”

So there will be no Dwarf Plan­et Biden, Bush, Clin­ton, or Obama un­til the next cen­tury.

The IAU’s oth­er plan­et-nam­ing rules are won­der­fully nerdy, and worth read­ing through. Those who find the plan­et are al­lowed to sug­gest a name, but the names are of­fi­cially se­lec­ted by a 15-judge com­mit­tee.

Gen­er­ally, the heav­ens em­ploy a Ro­man theme. But in some cir­cum­stances, the rules are highly spe­cif­ic. For ex­ample (em­phas­is mine):

“¢ “Ob­jects in or­bits between the or­bits of Jupiter and Nep­tune, and not in 1:1 res­on­ance with any ma­jor plan­et, are to re­ceive names of cen­taurs.”

“¢ “Ob­jects in or­bits in 3:2 res­on­ance with Nep­tune are to re­ceive names of un­der­world deit­ies.”

“¢ “Names of pet an­im­als are dis­cour­aged.”

“¢ “Names of a purely or prin­cip­ally com­mer­cial nature are not al­lowed.”

So no plan­et Ve­r­i­zon, either. 

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×