U.S. Prisons Are a Mess. Congress May Actually Do Something About It.

None

Inmates in a recreation yard at the Deuel Vocational Institution in Tracy, Calif, Jan. 12, 2012.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Aug. 8, 2013, 7:58 a.m.

Pris­ons in the United States are something of a dis­aster — both in terms of justice and the budget.

Some back­ground:

  • Roughly 1,000 Cali­for­nia in­mates may be re­leased this year be­fore they com­plete their sen­tences be­cause of a court or­der based on severe over­crowding in the state’s pris­ons. At the same time, in Louisi­ana, a fed­er­al judge is look­ing at wheth­er three death-row in­mates were put at risk of ill­ness or death due to high heat at the state pen­it­en­tiary. 
  • In­car­cer­a­tion rates for black Amer­ic­ans dropped from 2000 to 2009, but in 2009 black men were still 6.4 times as likely to be in­car­cer­ated as white men. Black in­mates now ac­count for about 38 per­cent of all in­mates in state and fed­er­al pris­ons, while white in­mates ac­count for 34 per­cent. The United States has the highest in­car­cer­a­tion rate in the world, and the largest in­mate pop­u­la­tion. In 2010, drug of­fend­ers made up 51 per­cent of the fed­er­al pris­on pop­u­la­tion, and the in­crease in time served by drug of­fend­ers ac­coun­ted for a third of the total fed­er­al pris­on pop­u­la­tion growth from 1998 to 2010.
  • There are 2.3 mil­lion in­mates in the U.S., at a cost of $55 bil­lion a year to the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. Some 218,000 in­mates are in fed­er­al pris­ons, with an av­er­age min­im­um-se­cur­ity cost of $21,000 an­nu­ally. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­ques­ted $6.9 bil­lion for the Bur­eau of Pris­ons in fisc­al 2013. At the same time, the private pris­on in­dustry has boomed, grow­ing by 1,600 per­cent between 1990 and 2010 and bring­ing in about $3 bil­lion in an­nu­al rev­en­ue.

So, what can be done? Two bi­par­tis­an mem­bers of Con­gress re­cently put for­ward an idea: Change the name of the Bur­eau of Pris­ons to the Bur­eau of Cor­rec­tions.

Those mem­bers — Reps. Jason Chaf­fetz, R-Utah, and Ha­keem Jef­fries, D-N.Y. — in­tro­duced H.R. 2984 just be­fore Au­gust re­cess. In in­tro­du­cing the bill, Chaf­fetz said:

This small change will help the bur­eau re­mem­ber that its mis­sion is not just to house people, but also to re­hab­il­it­ate pris­on­ers such that they are pro­duct­ive mem­bers of so­ci­ety when re­leased.

Jef­fries called it “an im­port­ant step in the right dir­ec­tion to­ward fun­da­ment­ally chan­ging our ap­proach to re­hab­il­it­a­tion and suc­cess­ful reentry in­to so­ci­ety.”

It also, of course, would do little to help pris­on over­crowding, sen­ten­cing laws that are ra­cially im­bal­anced, and the rap­id growth of a private pris­on in­dustry that has been plagued with prob­lems. It also wouldn’t help the huge price tag for the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.

That’s where the bi­par­tis­an House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee’s Over-Crim­in­al­iz­a­tion Task Force is try­ing to step in. The task force, which was ap­proved by a voice vote in May and began work in June, is au­thor­ized through the end of the year. The group’s goal is “to as­sess our cur­rent fed­er­al crim­in­al stat­utes and make re­com­mend­a­tions for im­prove­ments.” Its stated in­ten­tion is to cut down the es­tim­ated 4,500 fed­er­al crimes in the U.S. code.

The task force has already gen­er­ated some bi­par­tis­an praise. An Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on spokes­man said, “The task force has a unique op­por­tun­ity for mean­ing­ful re­form of our fed­er­al crim­in­al sys­tem” and that the ACLU hopes “it pri­or­it­izes restor­ing fair­ness to the crim­in­al justice sys­tem.” The con­ser­vat­ive Her­it­age Found­a­tion called the task force “a def­in­ite step in the right dir­ec­tion.”

And the task force isn’t the only mean­ing­ful con­gres­sion­al activ­ity. In March, Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion that would give judges more dis­cre­tion in sen­ten­cing fed­er­al crimes. A ver­sion of that bill is also un­der con­sid­er­a­tion in the House. Out­side of Con­gress, the Justice De­part­ment pushed for sen­ten­cing re­form in a Ju­ly let­ter to the U.S. Sen­ten­cing Com­mis­sion.

It, of course, re­mains to be seen wheth­er Con­gress will ac­tu­ally be able to get any­thing ac­com­plished. And this Con­gress has a par­tic­u­larly lousy track re­cord on that count. But with the crim­in­al justice sys­tem nearly tear­ing apart at its seams, there ap­pears to be real, bi­par­tis­an en­ergy be­hind ac­tu­ally get­ting something done. Even if it’s just chan­ging a name. 

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×