It’s Not Just Obama: Brooks Now Says GOP Is Waging ‘War on Whites’

Alabama Republican is proud of his “hyperbole,” as RNC issues chilly reaction.

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama. (Getty)
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Aug. 6, 2014, 6:30 a.m.

It’s not just the Demo­crats. The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee is en­ga­ging in a “war on whites,” GOP Rep. Mo Brooks sug­ges­ted today, while ex­press­ing pride for coin­ing the ra­cially charged “hy­per­bole.”

In a joint ap­pear­ance on Dale Jack­son’s talk-ra­dio show based in Hunts­ville, Ala., I read Brooks a para­graph from the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee’s post­mortem ana­lys­is of the 2012 elec­tion. I iden­ti­fied the source, and ex­plained to Brooks that the pas­sage echoed a state­ment I made on Fox News Sunday that he had mis­char­ac­ter­ized as part of the Demo­crat­ic Party’s “war on whites.”

If His­pan­ic Amer­ic­ans per­ceive that a GOP nom­in­ee or can­did­ate does not want them in the United States (i.e., self-de­port­a­tion), they will not pay at­ten­tion to our next sen­tence. It does not mat­ter what we say about edu­ca­tion, jobs, or the eco­nomy; if His­pan­ics think we do not want them here, they will close their ears to our policies.

Brooks replied, “By golly, we should not be di­vid­ing people as you just have in your com­ment­ary by race, by na­tion­al­ity, rather we should talk about “¦”  

I in­ter­rup­ted. “That was not my quote. That was your party’s quote. That’s the RNC “¦”

Brooks cut me off. “I don’t care that you made the state­ment or some­body else made the state­ment that triggered my re­marks, but that state­ment — that ar­gu­ment — is play­ing hand in glove with the Demo­crat­ic race-bait­ing strategy, and it has to come to a stop.”

Brooks’s jab got a chilly re­cep­tion at the RNC. Spokes­man Sean Spicer emailed, “We are on the right side of the is­sues, but as the re­port noted we have to take our mes­sage to every com­munity in Amer­ica.”

Brooks would be happy to know the RNC’s ef­fort to ap­peal to His­pan­ics es­sen­tially stopped after the re­lease of its wa­ter­shed re­port, the work of GOP Chair­man Re­ince Priebus and a hand­ful of oth­er party lead­ers who in­ter­viewed more than 2,600 fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans na­tion­wide.

The so-called autopsy, of­fi­cially called the “RNC Growth Op­por­tun­ity Book 2013,”  notes that oth­er minor­ity groups con­sider the GOP un­wel­com­ing, and cata­logues the steep de­cline in sup­port since Pres­id­ent George W. Bush earned 44 per­cent of the His­pan­ic vote. “As one con­ser­vat­ive, tea-party lead­er, Dick Armey, told us, ‘You can’t call someone ugly and ex­pect them to go to the prom with you. We’ve chased the His­pan­ic voter out of his nat­ur­al home.’ “

Not only did Brooks dis­miss the idea of ap­peal­ing to His­pan­ics, he said do­ing so was di­vis­ive, and he chal­lenged me to “name a politi­cian” who does so. I said, for starters, Bush, the former Texas gov­ernor and pres­id­ent, a Re­pub­lic­an who aimed rhet­or­ic and po­lices to­ward the His­pan­ic com­munity, and was re­war­ded for do­ing so.

I then asked Brooks if he thought the Pres­id­ent Obama was a big­ot. I don’t think he dir­ectly answered the ques­tion; there was a lot of crosstalk. This much I heard:

Demo­crats have a strategy to ap­peal to blacks based on race. The Demo­crats, as evid­enced by Nancy Pelosi’s com­ment re­cently, [are] also ap­peal­ing to Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans based on race. Now, to ap­peal to people based on race, there has to be a vic­tim race. Well, if there’s go­ing to be a vic­tim race, there also has to be an op­press­or race, so by in­fer­ence the Demo­crats are say­ing that the op­press­or race is the Caucasi­an race. “Oth­er­wise, there is no ra­cism. And it’s wrong what the Demo­crats are do­ing, and I hope you feel that it is as re­pug­nant as I do.

Throughout the ap­pear­ance, I told Brooks that both parties ap­peal to ra­cial blocs, and have done so throughout his­tory, but that phrases like his “war on whites” and the Demo­crat­ic Party’s “war on wo­men” are hy­per­bol­ic and di­vis­ive. At the top of the in­ter­view, Brooks ad­dressed that last point.

“I used hy­per­bole that forced the me­dia to cov­er it. Quite frankly, it got more cov­er­age than I thought pos­sible, and what is the “it”? The “it” is that the Demo­crats have in­ten­tion­ally en­gaged in a polit­ic­al strategy to di­vide Amer­ica based on race, and they’re im­ple­ment­ing that strategy. I nev­er thought that we would get that kind of ex­pos­ure.”¦ I’m very, very pleased that the Amer­ic­an people now have this as a dis­course.”

He is ac­tu­ally proud of him­self.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5151) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×