President Obama Reflects on America’s Inability to Influence the World

In a Friday press conference the president answers the question: “Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world? Have you, yours?”

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Aug. 1, 2014, 12:04 p.m.

Lately, the pres­id­ent has been strug­gling to turn his vis­ions for for­eign and do­mest­ic af­fairs in­to real­ity. Two sa­li­ent ex­amples: A U.S.-brokered cease-fire for the Ga­za con­flict fell through with­in hours (though for reas­ons bey­ond the con­trol of the U.S.), and it’s un­likely he’ll get any­where near the amount of money he’s asked Con­gress for to deal with the bor­der crisis.

Obama ad­dressed these short­com­ings in a press con­fer­ence Fri­day af­ter­noon. He was asked, “Has the United States of Amer­ica lost its in­flu­ence in the world? Have you, yours?”

Be­low is his re­sponse. It’s can­did, though hope­ful, and marked with a shade of resig­na­tion. (The later quotes were in re­sponse to a sep­ar­ate ques­tion, but con­tin­ued his thoughts on the mat­ter.) Em­phas­is is ours:

Look, this is a com­mon theme that folks bring up. Ap­par­ently, people have for­got­ten that Amer­ica, as the most power­ful coun­try on Earth, still does not con­trol everything around the world. And so our dip­lo­mat­ic ef­forts of­ten take time. They of­ten will see pro­gress and then a step back­wards. That’s been true in the Middle East. That’s been true in Europe. That’s been true in Asia. That’s the nature of world af­fairs. It’s not neat and it’s not smooth….

If you look at the 20th cen­tury and the early part of this cen­tury, there are a lot of con­flicts that Amer­ica doesn’t re­solve. That’s al­ways been true. That doesn’t mean we stop try­ing. And it’s not a meas­ure of Amer­ic­an in­flu­ence on any giv­en day or at any giv­en mo­ment that there are con­flicts around the world that are dif­fi­cult. Con­flict in North­ern Ire­land raged for a very, very long time un­til fi­nally something broke, where the party de­cided that it wasn’t worth killing each oth­er. The Palestini­an-Is­raeli con­flict has been go­ing on even longer than you’ve been re­port­ing.

You know, and I don’t think at any point was there a sug­ges­tion that Amer­ica didn’t have in­flu­ence, just be­cause we wer­en’t able to fi­nal­ize an Is­raeli-Palestini­an peace deal. You will re­call that the situ­ations like Kosovo and Bos­nia raged on for quite some time. And there was a lot more death and blood­shed than there has been so far in the Ukrain­i­an situ­ation be­fore it ul­ti­mately did get re­solved.

And so I re­cog­nize with so many dif­fer­ent is­sues pop­ping up around the world, some­times it may seem as if this is an ab­er­ra­tion or it’s un­usu­al. But the truth of the mat­ter is that there’s a big world out there, and that as in­dis­pens­able as we are to try to lead it, there’s still go­ing to be tra­gedies out there and there are go­ing to be con­flicts and our job is to just make sure that we con­tin­ue to pro­ject what’s right, what’s just….

I mean, the fact of the mat­ter is that in all these crises that have been men­tioned, there may be some tan­gen­tial risks to the United States. In some cases, as in Ir­aq and IS­IS, those are dangers that have to be ad­dressed right now. And we have to take them very ser­i­ously. But for the most part, these are not — you know, the rock­ets aren’t be­ing fired in­to the United States. The reas­on we are con­cerned is be­cause we re­cog­nize we got some spe­cial re­spons­ib­il­it­ies. We have to be — have some hu­mil­ity about what we can and can’t ac­com­plish. We have to re­cog­nize that our re­sources are fi­nite and we are com­ing out of a dec­ade of war. And, you know, our mil­it­ary has been stretched very hard. As has our budget. Nev­er­the­less, we try.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×