Patent Trolls’ New Strategy to Kill Patent Reform? Support Patent Reform.

Intellectual Ventures supports a bill that seeks to curtail patent trolling, which critics say is a good sign the bill doesn’t amount to much — or is headed nowhere fast.

Lynley Kirkness dressed as an elf admires the five-metre-high replica of the cave troll on the eve of the official opening of The Lord of the Rings Motion Picture Trilogy - The Exhibition at the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney, 22 December 2004, which is its only display venue in Australia.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
July 31, 2014, 1 a.m.

A com­pany of­ten ac­cused of be­ing one of the most fre­quent ab­users of the na­tion’s pat­ent laws is now en­dors­ing a meas­ure in Con­gress de­signed to slay pat­ent trolls.

But the sud­den peace of­fer­ing amounts to little more than a low-risk pub­li­city stunt, the firm’s crit­ics say, and be­lies its staunch op­pos­i­tion to rein­ing in such ne­far­i­ous be­ha­vi­or.

In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures sent a let­ter to law­makers last week sig­nal­ing its sup­port for the TROL Act, a nar­row meas­ure that ef­fect­ively rep­res­ents the last pat­ent-re­form bill stand­ing in Con­gress in a year that wit­nessed crush­ing de­feats to oth­er, more sweep­ing re­form meas­ures.

“The TROL Act is a pos­it­ive step to­ward end­ing ab­us­ive de­mand let­ters,” the com­pany wrote in its let­ter. “We com­mend you and your staffs for tak­ing a bal­anced ap­proach to the prob­lem of mis­lead­ing pat­ent de­mand let­ters while re­cog­niz­ing the need for le­git­im­ate pat­ent own­ers to law­fully com­mu­nic­ate with parties be­lieved to be in­fringing on their in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­erty.”

The ad­vocacy puts In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures on an un­usu­al side of a con­ten­tious de­bate over how Con­gress should deal with so-called pat­ent trolling — the prac­tice of com­pan­ies buy­ing up scores of cheap, vague pat­ents and us­ing them to leach cash from in­vent­ors by threat­en­ing in­fringe­ment suits. The Bel­levue, Wash.-based com­pany foun­ded by former Mi­crosoft ex­ec­ut­ives has tra­di­tion­ally been op­posed to most re­form ef­forts, and it lob­bied against a big­ger meas­ure that passed the House late last year be­fore dy­ing this spring in the Sen­ate.

But a num­ber of vet­er­an pat­ent-re­form ad­voc­ates see In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures’ em­brace of the TROL Act not as an about-face but as fur­ther evid­ence of the com­pany’s du­pli­cit­ous ef­forts to gum up real re­form ef­forts — and a re­mind­er of how weak the le­gis­la­tion really is.

Au­thored by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Lee Terry, the TROL Act would re­quire that de­mand let­ters, which com­pan­ies send to ac­cuse oth­ers of pat­ent in­fringe­ment, be more trans­par­ent and spe­cif­ic in their lan­guage. It also would co­di­fy powers gran­ted to the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion and state at­tor­neys gen­er­al to po­lice the de­liv­ery of ab­us­ive de­mand let­ters.

The meas­ure passed the House En­ergy and Com­merce’s Trade Sub­com­mit­tee, which Terry chairs, earli­er this month mostly along party lines, over­com­ing a late surge of op­pos­i­tion from some skep­tic­al Demo­crats who ac­cused Terry of block­ing im­port­ant stake­hold­ers — in­cluld­ing the FTC — from ne­go­ti­ations.

Some law­makers also sug­ges­ted that the TROL Act was a largely in­con­sequen­tial bill that would di­vert at­ten­tion from passing more-sub­stan­tial pat­ent re­form, such as the In­nov­a­tion Act, an om­ni­bus bill that passed the House late last year be­fore the Sen­ate shelved it.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4880) }}

That sen­ti­ment — that the the TROL Act gives largely lip-ser­vice to pat­ent re­form — is shared by a num­ber of groups that have been ag­gress­ively push­ing for le­gis­lat­ive re­lief in the war on pat­ent trolls for years.

Com­puter and Com­mu­nic­a­tions In­dustry As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Ed Black de­rided the meas­ure as one that “would ac­tu­ally em­power trolls and in­su­late ab­us­ive con­duct — that’s why pat­ent trolls are sup­port­ing it and those like us who want real re­forms are not.”

The TROL Act has “some small be­ne­fit” to the FTC in poli­cing bad act­ors who send out frivol­ous de­mand let­ters, but the agency already has the au­thor­ity to chase after the most ab­us­ive trolls, said Daniel Nazer, a staff law­yer at the pro-re­form Elec­tron­ic Fron­ti­er Found­a­tion. The bill would also pree­mpt some re­cently passed state laws ad­dress­ing de­mand let­ters, he ad­ded.

“I don’t think they care one way or an­oth­er about this bill. They just want to point to something and say, ‘Look what we sup­port,’ ” Nazer said. “The people work­ing on this bill aren’t try­ing to de­rail broad­er pat­ent re­form, but In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures sure is.”

In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures, however, con­tends that its sup­port for pat­ent re­form is genu­ine.

“More than a dozen groups, rep­res­ent­ing thou­sands of com­pan­ies, have writ­ten in sup­port of Chair­man Terry’s work on this le­gis­la­tion,” a spokes­man said. “Our let­ter, which echoes the sup­port ex­pressed by those in­dustry groups and also pro­poses ad­di­tion­al le­gis­la­tion to pro­tect small busi­nesses, is an ef­fort to be a con­struct­ive part of the de­bate.”

Re­gard­less of Ven­tures’ sup­port, the TROL Act likely faces an up­hill battle. One pat­ent lob­by­ist said House Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Bob Good­latte, who quickly throttled his In­nov­a­tion Act through the House last year, has asked lead­er­ship to not al­low Terry’s bill onto the floor. Good­latte, a Vir­gin­ia Re­pub­lic­an, doesn’t want move­ment on the TROL Act to take the wind out of his more com­pre­hens­ive pat­ent-re­form ef­forts” either this year or next year, the lob­by­ist said.

Good­latte “sup­ports com­pre­hens­ive pat­ent re­form, spe­cific­ally, the re­forms made in the In­nov­a­tion Act,” a House Ju­di­ciary aide said when asked about the mat­ter. “De­mand-let­ter le­gis­la­tion can be a part of the solu­tion, but he re­mains com­mit­ted to ad­dress­ing the prob­lem en­tirely.”

An En­ergy and Com­merce aide, mean­while, said there was no timeline yet for the full com­mit­tee to con­sider the bill, and that Chair­man Fred Up­ton was still work­ing to in­crease sup­port for it.

In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures boasts one of the largest pat­ent port­fo­li­os in the coun­try but rarely de­vel­ops its own products. It has ad­di­tion­ally equipped thou­sands of shell com­pan­ies with pat­ents in re­cent years in an ef­fort to more eas­ily levy in­fringe­ment claims against oth­ers with re­duced risk, ac­cord­ing to a 2012 Stan­ford study. Ven­tures pub­licly ac­know­ledged that it buys oth­er com­pan­ies an­onym­ously but dis­putes claims that it is not trans­par­ent in its law­suits.

In Feb­ru­ary, In­tel­lec­tu­al Ven­tures filed with the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion to form a polit­ic­al ac­tion com­mit­tee, a de­cision seen by many as an at­tempt to in­crease its in­flu­ence in a then-sim­mer­ing de­bate on Cap­it­ol Hill over how to re­form the pat­ent-lit­ig­a­tion sys­tem.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×