Why the NSA Keeps Tracking People Even After They’re Dead

A newly disclosed government rule book reveals just how easy it is to get placed on a terrorist watch list — and how difficult it can be to get taken off.

The National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters at Fort Meade, Maryland, as seen from the air, January 29, 2010. 
National Journal
Dustin Volz
July 23, 2014, 12:16 p.m.

You may be dead, but the U.S. gov­ern­ment won’t take you off its ter­ror­ist roster.

That’s ac­cord­ing to newly leaked in­tern­al guidelines from last year that re­veal in­tim­ate de­tails re­gard­ing the gov­ern­ment’s pro­cess for de­term­in­ing wheth­er an in­di­vidu­al should be des­ig­nated as a pos­sible ter­ror­ist sus­pect.

So broad are their cri­ter­ia that an in­di­vidu­al is able to be placed onto a watch list — and kept there — even if he or she is ac­quit­ted of a ter­ror­ism-re­lated crime. Ad­di­tion­ally, the guidelines note that a de­ceased per­son’s name may stay on the list be­cause such an iden­tity could be used as an ali­as by a sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ist.

The ra­tionale for adding someone to a watch list has gone from broad and opaque un­der the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion to even more ex­pans­ive un­der the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, ac­cord­ing to an ana­lys­is by The In­ter­cept, which pub­lished the guidelines on Wed­nes­day.

The 166-page re­port, as­sembled by the Na­tion­al Coun­terter­ror­ism Cen­ter in March 2013, provides guid­ance to the gov­ern­ment’s myri­ad in­tel­li­gence agen­cies on the rules for pla­cing an in­di­vidu­al in a ter­ror­ist data­base, in­clud­ing the con­tro­ver­sial “no-fly” list that bars cer­tain trav­el­ers from board­ing flights.

The “no-fly” list was dra­mat­ic­ally strengthened shortly after the Sept. 11 ter­ror­ist at­tacks. But the 2013 in­tern­al guid­ance re­port in­dic­ates that a “sub­stan­tial ex­pan­sion of the ter­ror­ist watch­list sys­tem” has con­tin­ued un­der the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and with the per­mis­sion of the pres­id­ent, a de­cision made after the 2009 “un­der­wear bomber” in­cid­ent that oc­curred on a pas­sen­ger flight to De­troit.

The cur­rent ter­ror­ist watch list is so easy to be put onto and so dif­fi­cult to get off of that even death might not erase a name. Ac­cord­ing to The In­ter­cept:

“Not even death provides a guar­an­tee of get­ting off the list. The guidelines say the names of dead people will stay on the list if there is reas­on to be­lieve the de­ceased’s iden­tity may be used by a sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ist — which the Na­tion­al Coun­terter­ror­ism Cen­ter calls a ‘demon­strated ter­ror­ist tac­tic.’ In fact, for the same reas­on, the rules per­mit the de­ceased spouses of sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ists to be placed onto the list after they have died.”

Both the Obama and Bush ad­min­is­tra­tions have re­fused to dis­close the cri­ter­ia for adding a name to one of its ter­ror­ist watch lists.

The In­ter­cept, launched by journ­al­ist Glenn Gre­en­wald, has routinely pub­lished leaks from Ed­ward Snowden since it formed earli­er this year. Not­ably, Wed­nes­day’s story makes no men­tion of Snowden provid­ing the doc­u­ments. It is un­clear how The In­ter­cept ob­tained the rule book.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×