The State Department Really Doesn’t Want to Break Up Iraq

A decentralized federal system is best for Iraq and for U.S. interests, a State Department official says.

Iraqi MP Qutaiba al-Jubouri waits for the start of the first session of the new parliament in Baghdad.
National Journal
Kaveh Waddell
July 23, 2014, 11:37 a.m.

The solu­tion to the crisis in Ir­aq is not to break the coun­try up in­to two or three states, ac­cord­ing to a State De­part­ment of­fi­cial. The best al­tern­at­ive is to set up a fed­er­al sys­tem that dis­trib­utes power to loc­al gov­ern­ments and se­cur­ity forces, al­low­ing for some re­gion­al autonomy while keep­ing the en­tire coun­try un­der Bagh­dad’s fed­er­al um­brella.

The of­fi­cial, Deputy As­sist­ant Sec­ret­ary of State for Ir­aq and Ir­an Brett McGurk, ad­voc­ated for a “cent­ral-re­gion­al-pro­vin­cial” ap­proach to se­cur­ity and gov­ernance in front of the House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee on Wed­nes­day. In such a sys­tem, loc­al cit­izens would be in charge of se­cur­ing the re­gions where they live, with backup from the state (this mod­el apes the U.S. Na­tion­al Guard). The Ir­aqi Army would “rarely de­ploy in­side cit­ies,” stay­ing back to provide over­all sup­port and pro­tect na­tion­al bor­ders.

The Ir­aqi con­sti­tu­tion calls for a sys­tem of “func­tion­al fed­er­al­ism,” but such a sys­tem was nev­er truly im­ple­men­ted. The State De­part­ment wants Ir­aq to move in the dir­ec­tion of fed­er­al­ism to help it strike a bal­ance between the in­de­pend­ence of Ir­aq’s three main groups — Sun­nis, Shiites, and Kur­ds — and the cre­ation and main­ten­ance of a ro­bust, cent­ral­ized state that can pro­tect it­self from out­side forces like the cur­rent ad­vance of mil­it­ants be­long­ing to the Is­lam­ic State in Ir­aq and Syr­ia. “This mod­el of func­tion­al fed­er­al­ism is feas­ible and ne­ces­sary,” McGurk said.

Rep. Eli­ot En­gel, D-N.Y., pushed back on McGurk’s in­sist­ence that Ir­aq be kept in­tact. “Ir­aq is not a real state,” En­gel said. “Why should we be ob­lig­ated to main­tain its bor­ders?” McGurk countered by point­ing to a de­vel­op­ing new gov­ern­ment in Ir­aq, which had its first par­lia­ment­ary ses­sion Wed­nes­day after the elec­tion of a new speak­er. The body met to elect a pres­id­ent, but post­poned that vote un­til Thursday. The Ir­aqi gov­ern­ment has agreed to elect a Kur­d­ish pres­id­ent, a Shiite prime min­is­ter, and a Sunni speak­er of the Par­lia­ment since 2003.

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials have de­scribed the ideal out­come in Ir­aq as “loose fed­er­al­ism” be­fore, and Za­l­may Khal­iz­ad and Ken­neth Pol­lack, of the Cen­ter for Stra­tegic and In­ter­na­tion­al Stud­ies and Brook­ings, re­spect­ively, re­cently called the idea the “least bad solu­tion” for the coun­try. Fed­er­al­ism “is the best out­come for all con­cerned, in­clud­ing the United States,” they wrote. McGurk’s testi­mony shows that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion agrees.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×