Both Parties Looking to Pare Down Obama’s Border Funding

Senate Democrats propose to cut $1 billion from the president’s request; House Republicans are expected to unveil an even deeper cut Wednesday.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: U.S. Congresswoman Kay Granger (R-TX) speaks at The Elton John AIDS Foundation and UNAIDS breakfast at the Russell Senate Office Building on July 24, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images for The Elton John AIDS Foundation)
National Journal
Billy House Michael Catalini
July 22, 2014, 5:38 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are plan­ning on Wed­nes­day to un­veil their own plan to deal with the bor­der crisis that would provide less than half of the $3.7 bil­lion in emer­gency spend­ing re­ques­ted by Pres­id­ent Obama.

In a closed-door meet­ing at the Cap­it­ol, House Ap­pro­pri­ations Chair­man Har­old Ro­gers is to lay out a GOP fund­ing al­tern­at­ive that seni­or aides have de­scribed as between $1.3 bil­lion and $1.5 bil­lion.

Ro­gers him­self said Tues­day that the spend­ing will be en­tirely off­set by cuts else­where in the budget — and geared to provid­ing agen­cies and oth­er op­er­a­tions in­volved in deal­ing with the surge of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors to the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der through Jan. 1.

Mean­while, Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­ers are work­ing on a sup­ple­ment­al spend­ing bill that would grant the White House $1 bil­lion less than it sought to ad­dress the in­flux of minors from Cent­ral Amer­ica at the na­tion’s south­ern bor­der.

Also on Wed­nes­day, Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Kay Granger of Texas is ex­pec­ted to re­lease a “set of prin­ciples” that have been put to­geth­er by her­self and oth­er mem­bers of a House “bor­der work­ing group” cre­ated by Speak­er John Boehner on im­mig­ra­tion policy.

Most of the work­ing group’s policy re­com­mend­a­tions are ex­pec­ted to be­come part of the House Re­pub­lic­an al­tern­at­ive to Obama’s pro­pos­al. They in­clude:

“¢ The need to provide for more Na­tion­al Guard in­volve­ment along the bor­der, in­clud­ing in hu­man­it­ari­an re­lief ef­forts, such as provid­ing food, shel­ter, and health care.

“¢ Chan­ging a 2008 anti-traf­fick­ing law to al­low im­mig­rant chil­dren at the bor­der to be vol­un­tar­ily and more swiftly re­turned to their home coun­tries rather than be­ing held for de­port­a­tion hear­ings. Many Sen­ate and House Demo­crats, in­clud­ing the Con­gres­sion­al His­pan­ic Caucus, have already said they would op­pose this.

“¢ Put­ting an end to the so-called “catch and re­lease” sys­tem for un­ac­com­pan­ied minors, and in­stead re­quir­ing that they be de­tained un­til they see an im­mig­ra­tion judge. The re­com­mend­a­tions will call for this to hap­pen with­in five to sev­en days.

“¢ “Chan­ging the nar­rat­ive” by pro­mot­ing — through ad­vert­ise­ments in Cent­ral Amer­ica — the no­tion that the U.S. will send im­mig­rants back home if they do not cross the bor­der leg­ally.

In the Sen­ate, Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Mikul­ski of Mary­land is craft­ing the $2.7 bil­lion le­gis­la­tion along with lead­er­ship in the hopes of get­ting it to the floor be­fore the Sen­ate re­cesses for Au­gust.

“The United States has an ob­lig­a­tion to help re­solve these crises, but is run­ning out of money,” Mikul­ski said in a state­ment. “The costs are real and ur­gent. We don’t save money by re­fus­ing to act or through delay.”

Demo­crats are slash­ing nearly $1 bil­lion from the pres­id­ent’s re­quest be­cause they’re angling to get Re­pub­lic­an sup­port, a seni­or Demo­crat­ic aide said. Re­pub­lic­ans have signaled they op­pose the pres­id­ent’s re­quest, char­ac­ter­iz­ing it as a blank check, and it’s un­clear wheth­er they’ll back Mikul­ski’s downs­ized ver­sion of the le­gis­la­tion.

An aide to Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell said he had not seen the meas­ure yet, but raised a ques­tion about wheth­er re­forms to leg­al au­thor­it­ies would be in­cluded.

The Sen­ate bill would au­thor­ize the fund­ing through the end of the year, the Demo­crat­ic aide said. It would also in­clude $225 mil­lion for Is­rael’s Iron Dome mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem, which has gained no­tori­ety in re­cent days for its ef­fect­ive­ness in re­pelling rock­ets from Hamas.

The bill will carry $615 mil­lion to ad­dress wild­fires as well.

Left out of the bill are changes to the im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem, which some law­makers had sought.

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id of Nevada said he’s hope­ful the Sen­ate could pass the meas­ure soon, but he did not guar­an­tee it.

“We feel com­fort­able where we are and would hope that Re­pub­lic­ans would sup­port us,” he said.

The bill’s path to pas­sage is fraught. For one, the Sen­ate has struggled all year with ap­pro­pri­ations meas­ures on the floor, with Re­id and Mc­Con­nell dis­agree­ing over how to pro­ceed on amend­ments. So far, the Sen­ate has passed none of the 12 an­nu­al spend­ing bills.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5114) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×