Why Border-State Gubernatorial Candidates Can’t Solve Their Voters’ Most Pressing Issue

Immigration is a hot-button issue, so border-state politicians talk a big game about it. There’s only one problem.

NOGALES, AZ - AUGUST 30: A group of apprehended illegal aliens walk to a U.S. Border Patrol vehicle after crossing into the U.S. August 30, 2005 in Nogales, Arizona. The governors of New Mexico and Arizona have declared a state of emergency along the border due to drug trafficking, illegal immigration and terrorism. 
National Journal
Zach C. Cohen
July 20, 2014, 5:10 p.m.

Ari­zona state Treas­urer Doug Ducey is run­ning for gov­ernor, and he’s prom­ising to fix the im­mig­ra­tion crisis by put­ting more “fen­cing, satel­lite, guards­men, more po­lice and pro­sec­utors” on the bor­der. GOP rival Christine Jones vows to do him one bet­ter: She says she’ll send “1,200 troops to the bor­der, use tech­no­logy to mon­it­or who’s com­ing and go­ing, fin­ish the fence, and send Obama the bill.”

It all makes per­fectly good sense: Im­mig­ra­tion is a hot-but­ton is­sue, so can­did­ates — es­pe­cially in bor­der states — are go­ing to want to talk about it.

The catch: There’s just not much they can ac­tu­ally do about it.

Im­mig­ra­tion is the province of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, not the states. That’s de­term­ined by the Con­sti­tu­tion and con­firmed by re­cent Su­preme Court rul­ings, in­clud­ing one that struck down sig­ni­fic­ant parts of Ari­zona’s con­tro­ver­sial 2010 im­mig­ra­tion law.

Gov­ernors can sign le­gis­la­tion that al­lows or denies un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants ac­cess to in-state tu­ition to pub­lic uni­versit­ies or driver’s and busi­ness li­censes, pop­u­lar op­tions for in­cum­bents. They can try to sue the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to re­coup im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated costs, but the courts re­jec­ted a 1994 at­tempt by Texas, Cali­for­nia, Ari­zona, and Flor­ida to do that.

And gov­ernors have some con­trol over the loc­al Na­tion­al Guard, but fed­er­al law — in­clud­ing laws that for­bid mil­it­ary per­son­nel from per­form­ing civil law en­force­ment — pre­vent the Guard from do­ing more than sup­port­ing fed­er­al bor­der-con­trol ef­forts, ac­cord­ing to im­mig­ra­tion-law ex­perts.

So for all the bold talk, all gov­ernors can really do is beg, plead, and work with Wash­ing­ton in the hopes of get­ting the kinds of re­sponses they want.

“That’s pretty fun­da­ment­al,” said former Ari­zona At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Terry God­dard, a Demo­crat who ran for gov­ernor in 2010. “That’s Found­ing Fath­ers work.”

At least some Re­pub­lic­ans agree. The leg­al frame­work lim­its gov­ernors — and those who want to be gov­ernor — to “cri­ti­ciz­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment,” said Re­pub­lic­an strategist Matt Mack­owiak, who used to be press sec­ret­ary for former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchis­on of Texas.

That’s worked polit­ic­ally for many gov­ernors and can­did­ates. Govs. Jan Brew­er of Ari­zona and Rick Perry of Texas have raised their na­tion­al pro­files dur­ing im­mig­ra­tion crises. New Mex­ico Gov. Susana Mar­tinez, as she runs for reelec­tion, has called Wash­ing­ton’s im­mig­ra­tion policy “a fail­ure of lead­er­ship.”

Texas Demo­crat­ic gubernat­ori­al nom­in­ee Wendy Dav­is and her pre­sumptive coun­ter­part in Ari­zona, Fred DuVal, use the im­mig­ra­tion is­sue to sep­ar­ate them­selves from the na­tion­al party. Dav­is cri­ti­cized Obama for not vis­it­ing the bor­der per­son­ally and has called for the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to cov­er bor­der-re­lated ex­penses Texas is in­cur­ring right now. DuVal blamed both the White House and Con­gress for “the lack of fed­er­al solu­tions” in an in­ter­view.

But on the cur­rent crisis, gov­ernors and can­did­ates can’t really do much more than call for fed­er­al ac­tion. Smith, Dav­is, and Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an Neel Kashkari are all ask­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment to in­crease the rate of de­port­a­tion.

“What is a state go­ing to do?” said Bill Mc­Cam­ley, a Demo­crat­ic state le­gis­lat­or rep­res­ent­ing a stretch of New Mex­ico’s south­ern bor­der. “We can talk about im­port­ant but re­l­at­ively minor things like driver’s li­censes. But in gen­er­al, it’s go­ing to be up to the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.”

Mesa May­or Scott Smith, an­oth­er Re­pub­lic­an run­ning for gov­ernor in Ari­zona, said that the can­did­ates mak­ing big prom­ises about im­mig­ra­tion are guilty of “empty rhet­or­ic.” In one Web video, Smith’s cam­paign plays back Ducey’s prom­ises and then asks, “And the gov­ernor con­trols how many satel­lites?”

Smith says there’s an ab­surdity to cam­paign­ing, and that it “has not played out any great­er than in im­mig­ra­tion. Can­did­ates pan­der­ing to the crowd, throw­ing red meat, and not of­fer­ing a real solu­tion. The un­for­tu­nate thing is that some­times that works.”

Asked if Ducey’s plan for im­mig­ra­tion is ac­tu­ally leg­al, a spokes­man for his cam­paign said via Twit­ter that Ari­zon­ans are “tired of be­ing Obama’s doormat” and that, if elec­ted, Ducey would “use every tool that is leg­ally avail­able to him.”

Like­wise, Jones said that Ari­zon­ans want as­sur­ance that something — any­thing — will be done about im­mig­ra­tion.

“People want to shoot holes in this thing,” Jones said. “They want to talk about wheth­er we can use the Na­tion­al Guard, they want to talk about wheth­er the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s go­ing to re­im­burse us.”¦ We just need to get something done.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×