How the U.S. Is Trying to Convince Central American Parents to Keep Their Kids Home

None

National Journal
Rachel Roubein
July 11, 2014, 1 a.m.

Perched on a rock, a boy wist­fully stares at the bleak, sprawl­ing waste­land be­fore him.

It’s an im­age plastered on a poster to be spread around El Sal­vador, Guatem­ala, and Hon­dur­as. There’s a mes­sage, writ­ten in the voice of a par­ent: “I thought it would be easy for my son to get his pa­pers in the North. That wasn’t true,” it says in Span­ish.

Law­makers are try­ing to fig­ure out just what ex­actly will stop par­ents from pay­ing thou­sands of dol­lars to smuggle their chil­dren in­to the United States, es­cap­ing pos­sible murder, rape, gang re­cruit­ment, and in­tens­i­fied vi­ol­ence in Cent­ral Amer­ica’s North­ern Tri­angle.

“I don’t think a moth­er in this coun­try ne­ces­sar­ily acts the same way as a moth­er in Hon­dur­as, Guatem­ala, or any oth­er place, be­cause their op­tions are so lim­ited,” Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., said at a Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee hear­ing Thursday.

A num­ber of pro­pos­als have been floated to grapple with just what ex­actly should be done — and what might work to stop the in­flux of un­ac­com­pan­ied chil­dren from El Sal­vador, Guatem­ala, and Hon­dur­as from cross­ing the bor­der il­leg­ally. But there’s one fact the White House and many Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats can agree on: Par­ents need to know they shouldn’t send their chil­dren on an il­leg­al jour­ney in­to the United States.

Two Ari­zona Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors an­nounced Thursday that they plan to in­tro­duce le­gis­la­tion aimed at ad­dress­ing the “hu­man­it­ari­an crisis” at the bor­der.

And the bill, offered by Sens. John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, will send a sig­nal to par­ents: “The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will only stem the flow of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors to the United States when their par­ents see us send­ing them right back,” Flake said in a state­ment. “This le­gis­la­tion gives the ad­min­is­tra­tion the flex­ib­il­ity it has re­ques­ted so it can be­gin to do just that.”

The sen­at­ors aim to en­cour­age par­ents in Cent­ral Amer­ica to ap­ply for refugee status in their home coun­try and avoid send­ing their chil­dren on jour­neys in­to the U.S. through Mex­ico. The bill provides some in­cent­ive in the form of 5,000 ad­di­tion­al refugee visas for each of the three coun­tries.

Ad­di­tion­ally, it calls for the ex­ped­ited re­mov­al of all un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants stopped at the bor­der to be com­pleted in a span of “hours or days,” drastic­ally de­creas­ing the cur­rent wait time of months to years, a press re­lease states.

There’s also already a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar ad­vert­ising cam­paign un­der­way aimed at telling par­ents that send­ing chil­dren in­to the U.S. il­leg­ally is dan­ger­ous, and they shouldn’t ex­pect leg­al pa­pers to be is­sued upon their chil­dren’s ar­rival. U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion de­veloped the cam­paign, and Pres­id­ent Obama’s emer­gency sup­ple­ment­al fund­ing re­quest asks for an ad­di­tion­al $5 mil­lion for the mes­saging.

But some law­makers are skep­tic­al that this will ac­tu­ally in­flu­ence par­ents. Maybe wit­ness­ing planes re­turn chil­dren home would work bet­ter, they say.

“Isn’t the most ef­fect­ive de­terrent for young people leav­ing Cent­ral Amer­ica com­ing to our coun­try ac­tu­ally hav­ing the people in those coun­tries — Hon­dur­as, Guatem­ala, and El Sal­vador — see­ing those young people re­turned? Isn’t that the most ef­fect­ive de­terrent versus an ad­vert­ising cam­paign?” asked Sen. John Ho­even, R-North Dakota, dur­ing Thursday’s Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee hear­ing.

To which Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son replied: “I agree that they need to see people com­ing back — that they wasted their money.”

But there are also oth­er ways to spread the word, John­son said, like he did on a re­cent trip to Guatem­ala.

“It was a rather awk­ward mo­ment, frankly, stand­ing next to the pres­id­ent of that coun­try, telling his cit­izens don’t come to our coun­try be­cause if you do, we will send you back, and it’s dan­ger­ous to do this,” he said. “But the pub­lic mes­saging is crit­ic­al.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×