If Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Run, Who Would Lead the Democratic Field for President?

Other potential Democratic candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Andrew Cuomo are largely unknown among potential voters, according to a new poll.

National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
July 8, 2014, 5:24 a.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton is al­most cer­tainly go­ing to run for pres­id­ent. But what if she doesn’t, and the Demo­crat­ic field winds up wide open?

If she chooses not to run, leav­ing the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion for pres­id­ent up for the tak­ing, Demo­crats would be in ac­tu­al dis­ar­ray, ac­cord­ing to a new Quin­nipi­ac poll re­leased Tues­day.

Right now, Clin­ton leads in the po­ten­tial Demo­crat­ic field with 58 per­cent, top­ping Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren of Mas­sachu­setts (11 per­cent), Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden (9 per­cent) and New York Gov. An­drew Cuomo (4 per­cent). Demo­crats clearly ex­pect Clin­ton will make a run for pres­id­ent, and they would gen­er­ally sup­port her can­did­acy if it hap­pens.

Clin­ton’s lead is much lar­ger than it was at this point in 2006 — after which she would even­tu­ally lose the nom­in­a­tion to a little-known sen­at­or from Illinois. In a June 2006 Gal­lup Poll, she led with 37 per­cent among Demo­crats in a the­or­et­ic­al 2008 match­up, fol­lowed by former Vice Pres­id­ent Al Gore at 16 per­cent, former Sen. John Ed­wards of North Car­o­lina at 13 per­cent, and Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry at 12 per­cent.

But if you take Clin­ton out of the pic­ture for 2016, the rest of the field con­sists of can­did­ates whom Demo­crats either don’t want or don’t know.

Take Joe Biden. The vice pres­id­ent holds a strong 73 per­cent fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing among Demo­crats, but, clearly, Demo­crats prefer oth­er people to him for the pres­id­ency. Biden is be­hind War­ren in this latest poll by a couple of per­cent­age points, and far be­hind Clin­ton.

While sev­er­al Demo­crats have high­er fa­vor­able than un­fa­vor­able rat­ings, the per­cent­age of people who haven’t heard enough about them is much high­er — 50 per­cent for Cuomo, 88 per­cent for Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, 53 per­cent for War­ren, and 88 per­cent for former Montana Gov. Bri­an Sch­weitzer, ac­cord­ing to this poll.

If Clin­ton didn’t run, Demo­crats wouldn’t know enough about the rest of the the­or­et­ic­al field to have a clear front-run­ner.

Now, this all be­ing said, Barack Obama was al­most nowhere to be found at this point in the elec­tion cycle in 2006. He man­aged to get the sup­port of only 1 per­cent of all voters when they were asked in June 2006 whom they would most like to see elec­ted pres­id­ent in 2008. Obama didn’t start hint­ing he would run for pres­id­ent un­til later in the sum­mer.

People didn’t know much about Obama, but it worked out for him just fine. It could work out for an­oth­er Demo­crat, too.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5062) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×