Ethics Chair: House Will Reverse Itself on Disclosure of Free Trips

The panel’s decision to delete a disclosure requirement — as lawmakers’ travel climbs — sparked quick criticism.

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
July 3, 2014, 7:53 a.m.

House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Con­away said Thursday that his pan­el would undo its con­tro­ver­sial de­cision to de­lete the re­quire­ment that law­makers list free trips they re­ceive on their an­nu­al dis­clos­ure re­ports.

“We will re­verse that de­cision,” Con­away said dur­ing an ap­pear­ance on a loc­al ra­dio talk show in his Texas dis­trict. “Heard first in Brown­wood, Texas,” the Re­pub­lic­an told listen­ers, one of whom provided a re­cord­ing to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted earli­er this week that the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee had quietly de­leted the dis­clos­ure re­quire­ment be­hind closed doors and without any pub­lic an­nounce­ment. Watch­dog groups cri­ti­cized the man­euver and, amid pub­lic cri­ti­cism, House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi said it “must be re­versed.”

Con­away, who had pre­vi­ously avoided any pub­lic com­ment on the mat­ter, said there had been “no ma­li­cious in­tent” and de­clared Thursday, “It was a wrong de­cision and we’re go­ing to fix it.”

The Eth­ics pan­el is one of the few com­mit­tees in Con­gress equally di­vided between Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats. Con­away said he and rank­ing mem­ber Linda Sanc­hez, D-Cal­if., who had pre­vi­ously signed off on the change, had jointly de­cided to re-im­ple­ment dis­clos­ure of free trips on an­nu­al forms.

“Linda and I have re­versed the de­cision,” Con­away said. He said law­makers would have between 15 and 30 days to amend their fil­ings to in­clude the free trips that they re­ceived from private spon­sors in 2013.

Even in re­versal, Con­away de­fen­ded the change as part of “an over­all look” at dis­clos­ure as law­makers move to an elec­tron­ic-fil­ing format. He noted that even with the change the free trips are still dis­closed sep­ar­ately, and soon­er, to the House’s Of­fice of the Clerk, where they are pos­ted on­line.

“This re­port on an an­nu­al basis is re­dund­ant, it’s du­plic­at­ive,” Con­away said. ” … So it’s out there, we’re not hid­ing any­thing from any­body.”

Watch­dog groups and some trans­par­ency ad­voc­ates in Con­gress, however, have noted that the yearly forms are the most scru­tin­ized doc­u­ment on law­makers’ fin­ances. “The bot­tom line is it sends a bad mes­sage. With the pub­lic’s trust in Con­gress at an all-time low, you don’t want to send a mes­sage that it can be more dif­fi­cult to find out in­form­a­tion,” Rep. Mi­chael Quigley, D-Ill., said in an in­ter­view earli­er this week.

Con­away said the firestorm oc­curred “only be­cause one re­port­er who makes a liv­ing jack­ing people up about these trips” wrote about the is­sue.

“We had got­ten not one com­plaint from the pub­lic,” he ad­ded of the un­an­nounced change. “Not one per­son had looked for this in­form­a­tion ex­cept this re­port­er.”

Con­away ex­pressed great­er frus­tra­tion with Demo­crats in Con­gress who had cri­ti­cized the change after the Na­tion­al Journ­al re­port.

“What I do get up­set with is my col­leagues throw­ing Linda and I un­der the bus over a de­cision that was made months ago,” he said.

He spe­cific­ally named “Mrs. Pelosi and a guy named [Rep.] Mike Fitzpatrick, who set their hair on fire — their right­eous in­dig­na­tion would be a lot more be­liev­able if they’d have said something in May when they didn’t file — when they filed their re­turn without that dis­clos­ure.”

Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Re­pub­lic­an, had sent a pub­lic let­ter to Con­away and the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee ur­ging them to re­verse the change on Wed­nes­day.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×