States Scramble to Find New Ways to Kill People

Ohio is running out of its stock of pentobarbital, the drug it uses to kill people on death row. And it is not alone.

This photo taken May 16, 2013, shows an electric chair on exhibit at the Texas Prison Museum in Huntsville, Texas. Between 1924 and 1964, 361 men died in the electric chair.
National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Aug. 16, 2013, 8:24 a.m.

It’s a really odd prob­lem to have. Ohio is run­ning out of the drug it uses to kill con­victs on death row, the sed­at­ive pento­bar­bit­al. Com­bined with a cock­tail of muscle para­lyz­ers, and heart-stop­ping drugs, pento­bar­bit­al is the first step in a series of in­jec­tions that states con­sider to be an eth­ic­al way of killing a per­son.

Re­u­ters re­ports that Ohio has filed with a fed­er­al court its in­ten­tions to find a re­place­ment for pento­bar­bit­al by Oc­to­ber 4, so that the new death cock­tail will be ready for a sched­uled Novem­ber 14 ex­e­cu­tion.

Ohio is not alone in the death-drug scramble. Texas, too, is run­ning out of the drug, and re­portedly has only enough to last through Au­gust. Mis­souri is also in a scramble and plans to re­place its stock with propo­fol — the drug that is most fam­ous for killing Mi­chael Jack­son. (The Mis­souri Su­preme Court just days ago gave the go ahead to start us­ing it.)

So why the short­age? Short an­swer: No com­pany really wants to be in the busi­ness of mak­ing death drugs. In 2011, the Dan­ish drug man­u­fac­turer that makes pento­bar­bit­al de­clared it would no longer sell its stock for use in cap­it­al pun­ish­ment. The European Uni­on even im­posed sanc­tions against selling death drugs to the United States. No U.S. man­u­fac­turer has syn­thes­ized leth­al in­jec­tion drugs since 2011. And in April 2012, a fed­er­al judge blocked the im­port of so­di­um thi­opent­al, a sim­il­ar drug, all to­geth­er.

Fa­cing short­ages, Geor­gia passed a Leth­al In­jec­tion Secrecy Act, which keeps the names of com­pan­ies that cre­ate death-pen­alty drugs, well, secret. The law would al­low the com­pan­ies to use what are called “com­pound­ing phar­ma­cies,” which make drugs on spec, and rely on the secrecy to pro­tect their em­ploy­ees. As Geor­gia’s as­sist­ant at­tor­ney gen­er­al re­layed to NPR news:

There’s a good reas­on for the state to pro­tect man­u­fac­tur­ers’ iden­tit­ies, she says.

“Once that com­pound­ing phar­macy’s iden­tity is re­vealed, how will the De­part­ment of Cor­rec­tions ever get an­oth­er com­pound­ing phar­macy to sell to us?” Gra­ham asks. “Cer­tainly, how will we get a doc­tor know­ing that he is go­ing to be, or she is go­ing to be, dragged in­to court?”

The law was chal­lenged re­cently in a death-pen­alty case, for al­low­ing cruel and un­usu­al pun­ish­ment. A man was set to die, but it was known that the state had run out of pento­bar­bit­al. So what was the state go­ing to use to do the deed? That, un­der the law, was a state secret. The mat­ter is still un­der re­view.

So, in sum­mary, here is the state of leth­al in­jec­tion in Amer­ica: No Amer­ic­an com­pany man­u­fac­tures the drugs, no in­ter­na­tion­al com­pany will sell to us, no phar­ma­ceut­ic­al out­let wants to be seen man­u­fac­tur­ing the drugs, states are re­sort­ing to secret con­coc­tions and rush­ing to find new leth­al com­bin­a­tions. Per­haps it won’t be a law that makes ex­e­cu­tions a thing of the past in Amer­ica. Maybe, it will just be the mar­ket.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4389) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.