Another Setback for Republicans: Dave Camp Won’t Run for Senate

The Michigan lawmaker is the second high-profile prospect to crush the hopes of state-party elders.

Camp: The real talk of the town.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Aug. 16, 2013, 8:43 a.m.

It’s back to the draw­ing board for Michigan Re­pub­lic­ans.

Rep. Dave Camp’s an­nounce­ment that he won’t run for a Sen­ate seat makes him the second top-tier Re­pub­lic­an to tan­tal­ize party eld­ers with the pro­spect of a can­did­acy, only to leave them crushed and grasp­ing for a fall­back plan.

“Over the past few months, I have re­ceived a lot of en­cour­age­ment to run for the United States Sen­ate. I have greatly ap­pre­ci­ated and am deeply humbled by those calls and con­ver­sa­tions,” Camp said in a state­ment. “After much thought and care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion, I have de­cided not to run for the United States Sen­ate.”

Camp’s re­jec­tion of a full-court press from Michigan GOP heavy­weights rep­res­ents a blow to the state party’s hopes of field­ing a top-tier can­did­ate for next year’s race, and is also a set­back for na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans hop­ing to cap­ture con­trol of the Sen­ate.

Already this year, sev­er­al well-known Re­pub­lic­ans — in­clud­ing Rep. Mike Ro­gers, the party’s pre­ferred can­did­ate — have de­clined to run for Michigan’s open Sen­ate seat. Camp was viewed as the best re­main­ing op­tion to run against Rep. Gary Peters, the de facto Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee. Now Michigan Re­pub­lic­ans will choose from a de­cidedly me­diocre primary field led by former Sec­ret­ary of State Terri Lynn Land.

Al­most im­me­di­ately after Demo­crat­ic Sen. Carl Lev­in an­nounced his re­tire­ment in March, GOP lead­ers in Lans­ing iden­ti­fied two tar­gets — Camp and Ro­gers — as their best bets to flip the seat in 2014. Both law­makers were cour­ted heav­ily and both agreed to con­sider a cam­paign. The next month, however, Camp told a room­ful of re­port­ers in Wash­ing­ton, “I’m not tak­ing a ser­i­ous look at the race.” Camp, the chair­man of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee, ad­ded: “I’m pretty busy.”¦ I’ve got a big job. I’m com­mit­ted to tax re­form, and I’m go­ing to work very hard to make it a real­ity.”

Michigan Re­pub­lic­ans then turned their at­ten­tion to Ro­gers. Like Camp, he had seemed re­cept­ive to ini­tial en­treat­ies to run. But also like Camp, Ro­gers is the chair­man of a power­ful House pan­el — the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee — and hin­ted that his time-in­tens­ive chair­man­ship would be in­com­pat­ible with a cam­paign.

Still, un­der in­tense pres­sure from a long list of loy­al donors, Ro­gers agreed to ser­i­ously ex­am­ine the race and de­liv­er a swift de­cision on his can­did­acy. But then weeks turned in­to months, and Ro­gers re­mained si­lent, prompt­ing Re­pub­lic­ans who had been bear­ish on his can­did­acy to re­think their po­s­i­tion. If he’s not go­ing to run, they wondered, why take this long to an­nounce it?

Just as op­tim­ism began to grow, it be­came ap­par­ent why Ro­gers was tak­ing so long: It gave the ap­pear­ance of thor­ough de­lib­er­a­tion when Ro­gers was con­sumed with a bar­rage of in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs and giv­ing no ser­i­ous con­sid­er­a­tion to a Sen­ate can­did­acy. People close to him — in­clud­ing his broth­er, state Rep. Bill Ro­gers — ac­know­ledged that the con­gress­man was claim­ing to “con­sider” the race be­cause donors and party lead­ers had asked him to, not be­cause he had any real in­terest in run­ning. With that writ­ing on the wall, Ro­gers fi­nally an­nounced in June what every­one now knew: He would not run for U.S. Sen­ate.

At that point, it ap­peared as though Michigan Re­pub­lic­ans would have to settle for an un­der­whelm­ing field. Be­hind the scenes, however, a hand­ful of party lead­ers were ur­ging Camp to re­con­sider his dis­missive words in April. With his chair­man­ship term-lim­ited, they asked, wouldn’t he rather take a shot at the Sen­ate in 2014 rather than re­turn to rank-and-file status in the House? In late Ju­ly the pres­sure ap­peared to have made an im­pact: Camp told Politico that he was giv­ing fresh con­sid­er­a­tion to the race, and had even dis­cussed his pro­spect­ive can­did­acy with Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell.

Former Michigan GOP Chair­man Saul Anuzis viewed the de­vel­op­ment as a hope­ful sign. With tax re­form ap­pear­ing in­creas­ingly un­likely, and Camp term-lim­ited as chair­man, it seemed the Sen­ate race would be the lo­gic­al move. “I’m really bullish,” Anuzis said at the time. “The stars might be com­ing to­geth­er.”

Lans­ing in­siders ramped up their full-court press, as­sur­ing Camp that be­cause of his im­press­ive war chest — con­tain­ing up­wards of $3 mil­lion — he could even wait un­til early next year to launch a cam­paign. That way, they reasoned, he could con­tin­ue to fo­cus on tax-re­form ef­forts this year without be­ing dis­trac­ted by a Sen­ate cam­paign.

But a dis­trac­tion it had already be­come. Camp began field­ing more ques­tions about the Sen­ate race than about tax re­form, and by Fri­day, he de­cided he could not pur­sue both. “I will con­tin­ue to put my full fo­cus and ef­fort on serving my con­stitu­ents in mid- and north­ern-Michigan as their rep­res­ent­at­ive and as chair­man of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee,” Camp said in his state­ment. “That in­cludes cre­at­ing a stronger eco­nomy by mak­ing the tax code more ef­fect­ive and ef­fi­cient, open­ing new mar­kets for Amer­ic­an goods and ser­vices, and crit­ic­al over­sight of Obama­care and the IRS.”

Party eld­ers now face a choice: Rally around Land, the long­time party loy­al­ist who is per­son­ally likable but polit­ic­ally vul­ner­able; or pur­sue a non­polit­ic­al per­son such as a self-fund­ing busi­nessper­son who can claim “out­sider” status in the primary and later against Peters. (In­deed, there is already chat­ter sur­round­ing two such can­did­ates — both un­named — in the metro De­troit area.)

The re­main­ing x-factor on the Re­pub­lic­an side is Rep. Justin Amash, the liber­tari­an law­maker whose polit­ic­al pro­file has been raised re­cently due to the de­bate over do­mest­ic-sur­veil­lance policy. Amash has been con­sid­er­ing the race since Lev­in’s re­tire­ment, but Lans­ing in­siders have no ex­pect­a­tion that he will run. Amash has not giv­en a timetable for his de­cision.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×