Prominent Democratic Pollster Changing Its Methodology

Public Policy Polling will be adding cell-phone users to its sample.

Action on the floor of the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida
National Journal
Steven Shepard
See more stories about...
Steven Shepard
Aug. 29, 2013, 10:19 a.m.

The Demo­crat­ic robo-polling firm Pub­lic Policy Polling is ex­plor­ing a sig­ni­fic­ant change to its meth­od­o­logy to in­clude the tens of mil­lions of voters who do not have land­line tele­phones.

PPP next Tues­day will is­sue a re­quest for pro­pos­als on in­clud­ing re­spond­ents who only have cell phones, said Tom Jensen, the firm’s dir­ect­or, who over­sees PPP’s day-to-day op­er­a­tions. These pro­pos­als may in­clude live-op­er­at­or phone calls to cell-phone re­spond­ents and text- and In­ter­net-based re­sponses.

The auto­mated tech­no­logy em­ployed by PPP and oth­er robo-poll­sters is less ex­pens­ive than tra­di­tion­al tele­phone polling, since there’s no need to em­ploy live in­ter­view­ers to ques­tion re­spond­ents and re­cord their an­swers. But fed­er­al law pro­hib­its auto­mat­ic dialers from call­ing cell phones, mean­ing that PPP’s sur­veys have only in­cluded land­line in­ter­views.

This has had a broad im­pact on the in­dustry. Since even most live-op­er­at­or polling firms use com­pu­ter­ized dialers, in­cor­por­at­ing more cell-phone re­spond­ents has been a costly en­deavor. But it has a broad­er im­pact for auto­mated poll­sters.

PPP’s pub­lic polls have be­come ubi­quit­ous in re­cent years, with polit­ic­al ob­serv­ers re­ly­ing on their sur­veys to touch on over­looked races and fill in the gaps cre­ated by shrink­ing me­dia budgets. That’s a gap that PPP has filled em­phat­ic­ally; the week­end be­fore last year’s elec­tion, the firm con­duc­ted pub­lic sur­veys in 19 dif­fer­ent states.

Some robo-polling firms, in­clud­ing Sur­vey­USA and Rasmussen Re­ports, have already taken steps to in­clude cell-phone re­spond­ents. Rasmussen began us­ing In­ter­net-based pan­els to sup­ple­ment their land­line in­ter­views last year, and Sur­vey­USA has been ex­per­i­ment­ing with both In­ter­net and live-caller in­ter­views.

Jensen said PPP is open to any pro­pos­al, and he hopes that po­ten­tial vendors for this sur­vey in­fra­struc­ture pitch him on a num­ber of dif­fer­ent ideas. “We cer­tainly know what oth­er people are do­ing, but we don’t really know the mech­an­ics of it,” he said.

The re­quest for pro­pos­als in­cludes a num­ber of factors for vendors to con­sider in mak­ing their pro­pos­als that speak to some of PPP’s unique chal­lenges. Though most polit­ic­al ob­serv­ers know PPP for the pub­lic polls they pro­duce and re­lease on their own web­site, the firm also works for Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates and causes. Ac­cord­ing to the re­quest, PPP is look­ing for pitches that would al­low it to provide the same, quick turn­around time for its sur­veys, in ad­di­tion to what the firm calls “scalab­il­ity” — the abil­ity to con­duct a poll in a small geo­graph­ic area for a loc­al or mu­ni­cip­al can­did­ate.

Take a loc­al, D.C. Coun­cil race, for ex­ample: Us­ing land­line ex­changes and lis­ted phone num­bers, it’s not dif­fi­cult to com­pile a sampling frame to in­clude only those num­bers cor­res­pond­ing to ad­dresses with­in the cor­rect ward. But since cell phones aren’t as­so­ci­ated with a phys­ic­al ad­dress, call­ing all num­bers with a “202” area code would mean that (as­sum­ing equal in­cid­ence of cell-phone own­er­ship) sev­en of every eight re­spond­ents wouldn’t be eli­gible to vote in that elec­tion. And that also as­sumes that voters don’t have “301” or “703” (or any oth­er area code) phones.

The oth­er key factor for PPP is af­ford­ab­il­ity. Be­cause of its auto­mated meth­od­o­logy, PPP’s prices are lower than oth­er Demo­crat­ic cam­paign poll­sters — and it in­tends to keep them that way. “We spe­cial­ize in provid­ing af­ford­able polling ser­vices to cli­ents who might not oth­er­wise be able to af­ford to do sur­vey re­search,” the firm’s re­quest for pro­pos­als states.

That means the firm is un­likely to fo­cus on the ex­pens­ive prac­tice of call­ing cell phones with live in­ter­view­ers as its main solu­tion to the cell-phone prob­lem, though Jensen said they could con­tract with a call cen­ter for that ser­vice if the cli­ent in­sisted.

Whatever solu­tion PPP de­cides to ex­plore, ex­pect it to be im­ple­men­ted on its pub­lic polls, as well — the one-to-three weekly sur­veys the firm con­ducts at its own ex­pense as a mar­ket­ing tool (this week, it was a poll of the Maine Sen­ate and gubernat­ori­al races).

“Our first choice would be something that’s cost-ef­fect­ive enough and easy enough to use on all of our sur­veys,” Jensen said.

Earli­er this year, Jensen told Hot­line On Call that it was likely his firm would ex­plore ways to in­cor­por­ate those without land­line phones. More than 38 per­cent of adult Amer­ic­ans live in house­holds without a land­line phone, ac­cord­ing to the latest data from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol, col­lec­ted dur­ing the second half of 2012.

“I think there’s a de­cent chance that we can keep on not call­ing cell phones and get­ting de­cent res­ults,” Jensen said Thursday. “Ob­vi­ously, we want our polls to be reach­ing as close to 100 per­cent of the pub­lic as pos­sible.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×