Rand Paul to Senate: “˜The President Must Make the Case for War’

The Republican senator isn’t the only one who thinks so — the majority of Americans want to hear it too.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., asks a question of Secretary of State John Kerry on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2013, as Kerry testifies before a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Syria.  
National Journal
Marina Koren
Sept. 9, 2013, 10:40 a.m.

In a let­ter to his fel­low sen­at­ors Monday, Re­pub­lic­an Rand Paul urged his col­leagues to vote “no” on a res­ol­u­tion be­fore Con­gress to au­thor­ize U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia, ar­guing that Pres­id­ent Obama hasn’t made a case for tak­ing ac­tion.

The Ken­tucky sen­at­or bor­rowed a line from former Sec­ret­ary of State Colin Pow­ell’s auto­bi­o­graphy: “War should be the polit­ics of last re­sort. And when we go to war, we should have a pur­pose our people un­der­stand and sup­port.” Paul wrote that he doesn’t be­lieve Syr­ia “passes that test.”

The law­maker, a GOP fa­vor­ite for the 2016 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion, isn’t alone in this opin­ion. A USA Today sur­vey re­leased Monday found that just 22 sen­at­ors and 22 House mem­bers say they’ll sup­port a U.S. strike against Syr­ia in re­sponse to a chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack al­legedly car­ried out by Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad’s re­gime last month. On the oth­er side, 19 sen­at­ors and 130 House mem­bers are ready to vote “no” on a res­ol­u­tion later this month to au­thor­ize the use of force.

Op­pos­i­tion to a U.S. strike against Syr­ia stretches bey­ond the Belt­way. The latest polls show that nearly two-thirds of Amer­ic­ans are op­posed to an at­tack, a sig­ni­fic­ant spike from just last week, when 48 per­cent of cit­izens were op­posed.

“This res­ol­u­tion does too much by in­volving us in a civil war in which there is no clearly defined Amer­ic­an na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­terest,” Paul wrote in the let­ter. Here, Amer­ic­ans seem split: 45 per­cent say Syr­ia poses a threat to the U.S., while 50 per­cent dis­agree.

Paul’s let­ter did echo Amer­ic­ans’ opin­ions on something that is likely to dom­in­ate the con­ver­sa­tion about Syr­ia this week. “The pres­id­ent must make the case for war,” he said. Fifty-four per­cent of Amer­ic­ans seem to agree with him, say­ing that Obama has not ex­plained his ra­tionale for a strike clearly enough.

Obama plans to do just that, in six tele­vised in­ter­views with ma­jor news net­works Monday night and a speech to the na­tion from the White House Tues­day night. The pres­id­ent won’t sway Paul; wheth­er he can con­vince the Amer­ic­an pub­lic re­mains to be seen.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4429) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.