Hagel Dodged the Kerry Question Two Weeks Ago

None

(AP Photo)
National Journal
Kevin Baron, Defense One
Kevin Baron, Defense One
Sept. 10, 2013, 9:58 a.m.

Two weeks ago in the Phil­ip­pines, De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel was asked the same ques­tion put to Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry yes­ter­day in Lon­don. Was there any­thing left that Syr­ia could do to avoid a U.S. mil­it­ary strike for us­ing chem­ic­al weapons? Hagel dodged, nobody no­ticed, and the U.S. car­ried on build­ing its case for mil­it­ary strikes on Syr­ia.

Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry, however, took the bait and answered a re­port­er’s ques­tion. “Sure, he could turn over every single bit of his chem­ic­al weapons to the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity in the next week - turn it over, all of it without delay and al­low the full and total ac­count­ing, but he isn’t about to do it and it can’t be done.”

The dif­fer­ence has been strik­ing. Hagel’s re­fus­al to en­gage the ques­tion en­sured the U.S. re­tained con­trol of its pub­lic push for ac­tion, while keep­ing Syr­ia (and Rus­sia) in­creas­ingly pres­sured by im­min­ent mil­it­ary strikes, isol­ated as pari­ahs in the wake of a chem­ic­al weapons at­ro­city.

After Kerry spoke on Monday, Rus­sia pounced on his of­fer and said it would try to con­vince Syr­ia, and Syr­ia has said it has re­ceived the idea. Overnight, Kerry be­came the fall guy for throw­ing a wrench in­to the Obama war drum ma­chine, weak­en­ing Wash­ing­ton’s stance, hand­ing con­trol of Syr­ia’s timeline to Mo­scow, and giv­ing As­sad a last minute way to avoid mil­it­ary strikes that could have crippled not just his chem­ic­al weapons stocks but the re­gime’s en­tire mil­it­ary cap­ab­il­ity, po­ten­tially fatally.

On Aug. 30, Hagel was at the end of a nine day South­east Asi­an swing dur­ing which Syr­i­an strikes seemed so im­min­ent that the trav­el­ing Pentagon press corps was told each night wheth­er it seemed safe enough to go sleep or not. By the time Hagel reached Ma­nila, the war drums and re­port­ers were be­gin­ning to wane, but noth­ing was chan­ging out of Syr­ia.

So, the press corps craf­ted this ques­tion for the sec­ret­ary, asked by NPR’s Larry Ab­ramson:

Q: Thank you. My ques­tion is for Sec­ret­ary Hagel. Sir, is there any­thing that the As­sad re­gime can do right now to take the mil­it­ary op­tion off the table at this late hour?

SEC. HAGEL: I have not been in­formed of any change in the As­sad re­gime’s po­s­i­tion on any is­sue. So I deal with the real­ity of what we have. I don’t spec­u­late on hy­po­thet­ic­al situ­ations. I think you know where the United States gov­ern­ment is and our ana­lys­is of what happened in Syr­ia, as well as most na­tions of the world con­demning the use of chem­ic­al weapons and our op­tions as we con­tin­ue to con­sult with our al­lies. We’ll fur­ther de­vel­op the facts and in­tel­li­gence on what happened.

Both men are testi­fy­ing side-by-side be­fore the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee on Tues­day morn­ing. Pres­id­ent Obama is sched­uled to ad­dress the na­tion from the Oval Of­fice in prime­time later in the even­ing.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×