Strikes Averted. Is There a Path to Peace in Syria?

After the U.N. confirmed chemical weapons were used, President Obama and other Western leaders seem optimistic about a diplomatic path forward.

Members of the U.N. investigation team take samples from sand near a part of a missile that is likely to be one of the chemical rockets.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 17, 2013, 2 a.m.

The United Na­tions con­firmed Monday what the U.S. and its al­lies have been say­ing for weeks: Chem­ic­al weapons con­tain­ing the deadly pois­on sar­in were used in Syr­ia on Aug. 22.

While the U.N. re­port does not as­sign blame — they say it’s a purely sci­entif­ic ana­lys­is without polit­ic­al in­ter­pret­a­tion — it has only bolstered the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s case, as it con­tin­ues to press the As­sad re­gime to des­troy its massive chem­ic­al-weapons stock­piles.

The res­ults of the re­port show “over­whelm­ing and in­dis­put­able” evid­ence that chem­ic­al weapons were used on a “re­l­at­ively large scale,” ac­cord­ing to U.N. Sec­ret­ary-Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon.

But as West­ern of­fi­cials re­acted to the latest re­port from the U.N. and the deal to des­troy or con­tain all Syr­i­an chem­ic­al weapons by the middle of 2014 — a deal which the U.S. and Rus­sia ne­go­ti­ated over the week­end — they also seemed to think that this latest break­through leaves an open­ing for broad­er peace talks between Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad and the op­pos­i­tion.

The lar­ger point: If the U.S. hadn’t threatened mil­it­ary ac­tion after Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack, a peace­ful path for­ward in Syr­ia might nev­er have emerged.

Pres­id­ent Obama has backed a dip­lo­mat­ic end to the Syr­i­an civil war for sev­er­al months, but in an in­ter­view with 60 Minutes on Sunday, he sug­ges­ted that if it wer­en’t for the threat of ac­tion “we would not be get­ting even tick­lers like this.”

“We’re go­ing to have to get the parties to ar­rive at some sort of set­tle­ment,” he said on CBS. “But this may be the first step in what po­ten­tially could be an end to ter­rible blood­shed and mil­lions of refugees throughout the re­gion that is of deep con­cern to us and our al­lies.”

Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry and his coun­ter­parts from the United King­dom and France seemed to echo those thoughts Monday. Brit­ish For­eign Min­is­ter Wil­li­am Hag­ue said he re­mains com­mit­ted to the mod­er­ate op­pos­i­tion and a res­ol­u­tion through meet­ings in Switzer­land between the As­sad re­gime, the op­pos­i­tion, West­ern al­lies, and Rus­sia.

“Our goal re­mains to con­vene a second Geneva con­fer­ence to bring all sides to­geth­er to agree a polit­ic­al solu­tion to the con­flict, and we will work with Rus­sia on bring­ing that about as soon as pos­sible,” Hag­ue said in Par­is on Monday.

Kerry’s tone was strongest among his col­leagues in see­ing As­sad’s ouster:

“We make it clear that As­sad has lost all le­git­im­acy to be pos­sible to gov­ern this coun­try, and we re­main com­mit­ted to the op­pos­i­tion and com­mit­ted to the Geneva pro­cess, which calls for a trans­ition gov­ern­ment with full ex­ec­ut­ive au­thor­ity by mu­tu­al con­sent of the parties that will lay out the struc­ture for the new Syr­ia,” he said.

But what these state­ments seem to com­plic­ate, however, is the in­volve­ment of the As­sad re­gime in loc­at­ing and des­troy­ing Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al-weapons stock­pile. And while the weapons are be­ing con­tained and the West tries to pro­mote peace talks, the U.S. con­tin­ues to fun­nel arms in­to Syr­ia to help op­pos­i­tion forces in an at­tempt to even the fight.

Fur­ther, it’s un­clear wheth­er the As­sad re­gime will co­oper­ate and fol­low through with this latest agree­ment. The Amer­ic­an pub­lic seems to think not. Ac­cord­ing to a new poll re­leased by Pew, 57 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans dis­agree that Syr­ia will give up its chem­ic­al weapons in re­sponse to dip­lomacy, as op­posed to just 26 per­cent who would agree. And if it doesn’t work, just 37 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans think the U.S. should use air­strikes if these dip­lo­mat­ic ef­forts don’t work.

So, while the U.S. and Rus­sia seem more will­ing to find a solu­tion to the con­flict in Syr­ia, that still does not dis­tract from the stark real­it­ies on the ground: The As­sad re­gime and frag­men­ted op­pos­i­tion forces con­tin­ue their bloody battles.

And the re­gion is not im­mune to this fight­ing, either. On Monday, Turk­ish war­planes shot down a Syr­i­an heli­copter that vi­ol­ated Tur­key’s air­space—this is not the first time this has happened.

The situ­ation in Syr­ia is com­plex. But in an­noun­cing the res­ults of the U.N. re­port, Ban said he wants to gath­er all parties in Geneva for peace talks, and will meet with Kerry and Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov later this month to dis­cuss when this can hap­pen.

“My hope is that this in­stance will serve as a wake-up call,” Ban said Monday. Sure. But it also might serve as a way out of the broad­er con­flict.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4447) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×