Navy Yard Shows Fallacy of NRA’s ‘More Guns’ Solution

After Newtown, the gun lobby powerhouse said the solution was armed guards. So what about Navy Yard?

Members of the military guard a military garage near the Navy Yard. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
National Journal
Matthew Cooper
See more stories about...
Matthew Cooper
Sept. 17, 2013, 5:34 a.m.

After the shoot­ing in New­town that left 20 ele­ment­ary school stu­dents dead, the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation re­spon­ded with a pro­pos­al for what it called Na­tion­al School Shield pro­gram. The idea, said the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s lead­er, Wayne LaPierre, was that “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” The shield pro­gram aimed to put an armed guard in every ele­ment­ary school in the coun­try to pro­tect chil­dren from the next de­ranged killer.

The Navy Yard shoot­ing ex­poses a fal­lacy in that ar­gu­ment. A mil­it­ary fa­cil­ity, the Navy Yard had plenty of good guys with weapons who were non­ethe­less were un­able to stop Aaron Alex­is, the al­leged shoot­er, from killing a dozen in­no­cent per­sons. In the com­ing weeks, we’ll learn more about Navy Yard se­cur­ity and how Alex­is was able to thwart it. (We’ll also learn more about how he ob­tained his arms, but let’s leave that aside for now.)

True, the Navy Yard is not a heav­ily armed fa­cil­ity. It’s not like, say, walk­ing in­to a mil­it­ary base in the U.S. let alone onto a war zone. But neither was it the kind of gun-free school zone that the NRA has de­scribed as an in­vit­ing tar­get for crazed shoot­ers. It was at least as heav­ily armed as we can ex­pect any ele­ment­ary school could ever be un­der the Na­tion­al School Shield pro­gram. And yet, carnage.

The NRA is in some sense right that guns stop mass shoot­ers ““ al­though in At­lanta this year, a de­ranged man with weapons was talked in­to sur­render by a savvy, quick-think­ing ad­min­is­trat­or. Still, guns stopped Alex­is, not pleas. In that sense, La Pierre is right.

But it’s also true that shoot­ers seem em­in­ently cap­able of wreak­ing carnage be­fore they can be stopped by on-site, armed per­son­nel. This was true in the shoot­ing at the U.S. Army’s Fort Hood base and at Columbine High School, which had an armed guard. By the NRA’s own lo­gic, un­less vir­tu­ally every teach­er in a school, or per­son in an of­fice, is pack­ing heat and is trained to use their weapon, a de­term­ined shoot­er can sow hav­oc be­fore their weapons are si­lenced

After New­town, La Pierre looked to re­tired po­lice of­ficers, among oth­ers, to be en­lis­ted so that there would be a guard in every ele­ment­ary school.

There may be a good ar­gu­ment for hav­ing armed guards in schools and many have chosen to provide such pro­tec­tion, but the idea that guards alone will pre­vent mass shoot­ings isn’t one of them. If the United States Navy couldn’t take out a mass shoot­er be­fore he—and it’s al­ways a he—does his de­ranged work, can a guard?

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×