Boehner Serves Red Meat, and Republicans Eat It Up

The speaker’s plan on funding and delaying Obamacare reflects conservative wishes, but is mostly a play at unity, not policy.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Republican leaders emerge from a closed-door strategy session at the Capitol, Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013. House GOP leaders are looking to reverse course and agree to tea party demands to try to use a vote this week on a must-pass temporary government funding bill to block implementation of President Barack Obama's health care law. Boehner is followed by House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Sept. 18, 2013, 8:34 a.m.

Some of House Speak­er John Boehner’s fiercest con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics emerged from Wed­nes­day morn­ing’s GOP Con­fer­ence meet­ing vis­ibly elated, heap­ing praise on Boehner and his lead­er­ship team for their polit­ic­ally risky pro­pos­al to tem­por­ar­ily fund the gov­ern­ment while per­man­ently de­fund­ing Obama­care.

“I think our lead­er­ship has got it just right,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who dur­ing the pre­vi­ous Con­gress of­ten clashed with Boehner while lead­ing the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee. Asked wheth­er con­ser­vat­ives are pleased with Boehner’s plan, Jordan replied, “Oh, yeah. Heck, yeah.”

“Everything I heard in there was very pos­it­ive,” said Rep. Mick Mul­vaney of South Car­o­lina, who voted against Boehner in Janu­ary’s lead­er­ship elec­tions.

Ad­ded Rep. Matt Sal­mon of Ari­zona: “I think it’s the best plan I’ve heard in a long time.”

En­thu­si­asm on the Right is seem­ingly jus­ti­fied. The pro­pos­al laid out by Boehner on Wed­nes­day morn­ing gives con­ser­vat­ives al­most ex­actly what they’ve been ask­ing for: A short-term con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion (this one ex­pires Dec. 15); an ex­ten­sion of cur­rent, post-se­quester spend­ing levels ($986.3 bil­lion, to be ex­act); and a prom­ise to per­man­ently re­move fund­ing for the Af­ford­able Care Act (a memo from lead­er­ship says the CR lan­guage will “per­man­ently and fully de­fund Obama­care spend­ing through pro­hib­it­ing dis­cre­tion­ary and man­dat­ory spend­ing and res­cind­ing all un­oblig­ated bal­ances”).

The fund­ing pro­pos­al also in­cor­por­ates the Full Faith and Cred­it Act, which lead­er­ship says would re­quire the Treas­ury De­part­ment “to make good on pub­lic debt pay­ments should Amer­ica reach the debt ceil­ing.” At the same time, it sets the table for a forth­com­ing GOP debt-ceil­ing pro­pos­al—per­haps ar­riv­ing as early as next week—that will tar­get long­time goals, such as en­ti­tle­ment re­forms, the Key­stone Pipeline, and, of course, de­fund­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“This is a vic­tory for the Amer­ic­an people,” said Rep. Tom Graves of Geor­gia, who provided Boehner a blue­print with a bill that would fund the gov­ern­ment for fisc­al 2014 while delay­ing and de­fund­ing Obama­care un­til 2015. Graves, whose meas­ure had at­trac­ted up­wards of 70 con­ser­vat­ive co­spon­sors, said Boehner’s lead­er­ship team “was very re­cept­ive” to his ideas after their plan dis­solved late last week.

Boehner’s de­cision to back a spend­ing bill that de­funds Pres­id­ent Obama’s sig­na­ture do­mest­ic achieve­ment shifts the fo­cus to the Sen­ate, where Demo­crats could be forced to take a vote on the di­vis­ive health care law. “I think this is go­ing to be crit­ic­al to fi­nally force the Sen­ate to vote on a delay of Obama­care,” said Rep. Steve Scal­ise, chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee.

With a Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity in the up­per cham­ber, however, and Obama already vow­ing to de­feat any at­tempt to de­fund the health care law, it seems highly un­likely that this House pro­pos­al will ac­com­plish any­thing oth­er than unit­ing con­ser­vat­ives and shift­ing fo­cus to the Sen­ate—all while tak­ing Con­gress one step closer to a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

But in the ruth­less realm of in­tern­al GOP polit­ics, the anti-Obama­care pro­pos­al achieves what Rep. Paul Ry­an of Wis­con­sin called a “uni­fy­ing” pur­pose. Namely, it puts Boehner on the same page with his con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers, some of whom have openly ques­tioned wheth­er the speak­er has the stom­ach for fight­ing over Obama­care with a gov­ern­ment shut­down on the line.

“Today I heard a re­solve in the speak­er’s voice,” said Sal­mon. “Strategies come and go, but we want res­ults. We’ve got a very short win­dow to stop this thing from be­ing im­ple­men­ted. Today I heard in the speak­er’s voice a com­mit­ment—and a plan—to do that. And I’m ex­cited.”

Even mem­bers who have been con­sist­ently crit­ic­al of Boehner’s team—such as Rep. Tim Huel­skamp of Kan­sas—walked away from Wed­nes­day’s meet­ing feel­ing good about lead­er­ship’s plan. “It’s a very good sign; it’s a sign that they’re listen­ing,” he said.

Huel­skamp, who on Tues­day “guar­an­teed” that a Graves-style plan would win 218 Re­pub­lic­an votes on the House floor, stood by that pre­dic­tion Wed­nes­day. “I think so,” he said. “You put it on the floor, I think we all have to vote for it—un­less someone says it doesn’t go far enough, long enough, or deep enough.”

Of course, there are those mem­bers, too. “I can’t sup­port pro­posed CR,” Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan wrote on Twit­ter soon after the sum­mit ad­journed. “It’s a #Stealth­Debt­LimitH­ike; it ex­empts in­terest from debt lim­it, ef­fect­ively rais­ing debt lim­it per­man­ently.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4449) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.