As Sun Shines on Solar Industry, Power Companies Fret

None

A picture shows solar panels installed on the roof of a building in Lille on September 9, 2013.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Oct. 6, 2013, 7:27 a.m.

Com­pared with the cost of fossil-fuel-gen­er­ated elec­tri­city, sol­ar power isn’t cheap. But it’s be­com­ing more af­ford­able thanks to state and fed­er­al sub­sidies and com­pet­it­ive leas­ing and fin­an­cing op­tions. Add to this the fast-drop­ping price of photo­vol­ta­ic pan­els and sol­ar is start­ing to look like an in­creas­ingly cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion for many Amer­ic­ans.

As the tech­no­logy be­comes more wide­spread, however, util­it­ies are fight­ing harder than ever to stop sol­ar in its tracks, and they see reg­u­la­tion levied through state gov­ern­ments as the way to do it.

A main reas­on why sol­ar has be­come in­creas­ingly af­ford­able and a ma­jor thorn in the side of power com­pan­ies is a policy, now in ef­fect in 43 states, called net-meter­ing. Through these sys­tems, cus­tom­ers with sol­ar pan­els can earn cred­its for sur­plus elec­tri­city gen­er­ated dur­ing the day. The cred­its are then sold back to the util­ity and used to off­set the cost of con­ven­tion­al power pro­duc­tion, which sol­ar users must still rely on when the sun is not shin­ing.

Net-meter­ing has func­tioned as a kind of sub­sidy for sol­ar power, and sol­ar ad­voc­ates want the policy to re­main in place. Util­it­ies, however, ar­gue that now that sol­ar has be­come more af­ford­able, these sub­sidies should be scaled back or elim­in­ated al­to­geth­er.

Ac­cord­ing to Richard McMa­hon, vice pres­id­ent for en­ergy sup­ply and fin­ance at the Edis­on Elec­tric In­sti­tute, a trade as­so­ci­ation rep­res­ent­ing all U.S. in­vestor-owned elec­tric com­pan­ies, util­it­ies aren’t en­tirely op­posed to net-meter­ing; they just want a change in terms.

“What we’re con­cerned with primar­ily is the rate at which the util­it­ies are ex­pec­ted to pay for the sur­plus power gen­er­ated by con­sumers us­ing sol­ar pan­els,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “That’s what’s known as the feed-in tar­iff, and these tar­iffs are set much high­er than at mar­ket rates. These sub­sidies were put in place when sol­ar was in its nas­cent stages but now it’s out­grown the need for them.”

In ad­di­tion to press­ing state reg­u­lat­ors to re­vise the rates at which sol­ar users sell back their elec­tri­city to util­it­ies com­pan­ies, EEI is ask­ing state le­gis­lat­ors to raise costs for sol­ar cus­tom­ers. McMa­hon says this is be­cause sol­ar cus­tom­ers aren’t pay­ing their fair share for use of the power grid.

Sol­ar ad­voc­ates, on the oth­er hand, say the sub­sidies are do­ing what they’re sup­posed to do — make sol­ar more af­ford­able — and that they need to be left un­touched.

“Earn­ing a cred­it for the elec­tri­city that feeds back in­to the grid is only fair,” said Will Craven, a spokes­man for the Al­li­ance for Sol­ar Choice, a co­ali­tion of sol­ar fin­an­cing and elec­tri­city com­pan­ies.

“Really what util­it­ies are at­tack­ing right now is the cus­tom­er’s right to use less elec­tri­city,” he said. “When sol­ar was a boutique en­ergy source that was only avail­able to the wealthy, it was something util­it­ies could tol­er­ate. But now that sol­ar costs have come down greatly, they are threatened by us be­cause we rep­res­ent really the first com­pet­i­tion they have ever had.”

So far no ma­jor reg­u­lat­ory changes im­pact­ing net-meter­ing or feed-in tar­iffs on the state level have been en­acted, but util­it­ies across the coun­try are press­ing for change. Lob­by­ing ef­forts are play­ing out in many state cap­it­als, but McMa­hon said that in the fu­ture there could be is­sues re­lat­ing to reg­u­la­tion of sol­ar power and costs borne by util­it­ies that need to be ad­dressed by the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion.

What re­mains to be seen now is wheth­er any of the pro­posed changes will go through and how they stand to al­ter the cost equa­tion on sol­ar if they’re suc­cess­ful.

At least one sol­ar ex­pert thinks the im­pact could be dev­ast­at­ing.

“I think it could hurt it pretty badly,” said An­drea Luecke, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Sol­ar Found­a­tion, a non­profit ded­ic­ated to pro­mot­ing the ex­pan­sion of sol­ar tech­no­logy, when asked how ad­di­tion­al fees levied on cus­tom­ers us­ing sol­ar on a res­id­en­tial scale would im­pact the in­dustry. “Do I think it will kill it? In the short term, yes. We’re not yet at a point where we can com­pete without in­cent­ives or some type of sup­port. If util­it­ies win in this battle and ef­fect­ively shut­ter res­id­en­tial mar­kets, it’s go­ing to have a very dra­mat­ic ef­fect.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×