Finally Over, Showdown Tees Up New Battles

None

US President Barack Obama arrives to speak about the government shutdown and debt ceiling standoff in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC, October 16, 2013.
National Journal
Billy House Tim Alberta Elahe Izadi Michael Catalini
See more stories about...
Billy House Tim Alberta Elahe Izadi Michael Catalini
Oct. 16, 2013, 7:46 p.m.

The de­fi­cit-ceil­ing stale­mate and 16-day gov­ern­ment shut­down cost the eco­nomy bil­lions, put tens of thou­sands out of work, made some little-known con­gress­men fam­ous, and tested the bal­ance of power in Con­gress.

Yet as law­makers ended the stan­doff with a hard-fought agree­ment, many poin­ted to a land­scape left largely un­changed, with fisc­al fights as­sured in the months ahead and long-stand­ing polit­ic­al dif­fer­ences left un­re­solved.

“The battle is over,” said Rep. Aus­tin Scott, R-Ga., a tea-party fa­vor­ite who was pres­id­ent of the House GOP fresh­man class in 2011, “but the war has just be­gun.”

The agree­ment ap­proved by both cham­bers late Wed­nes­day night will end the gov­ern­ment shut­down when Pres­id­ent Obama signs it, as he has prom­ised to do, and main­tains gov­ern­ment fund­ing through Jan. 15. Fed­er­al agen­cies — and the Con­gress — will re­open with em­ploy­ees ex­pec­ted back at work Thursday, ac­cord­ing to the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget. A pro­vi­sion for back pay is in­cluded.

The meas­ure also ex­tends the na­tion’s abil­ity to bor­row — which the ad­min­is­tra­tion said would be ex­hausted Thursday — through Feb. 7. The Treas­ury De­part­ment will be per­mit­ted to use ex­traordin­ary meas­ures to bor­row after that date, if it needs to, which could ex­tend the dead­line. There’s also a mech­an­ism for Con­gress to vote in fa­vor of a “mo­tion to dis­ap­prove” any in­crease the pres­id­ent an­nounces, but Obama can veto that and force an over­ride ef­fort.

The agree­ment paved the way for the House and Sen­ate to con­fer­ence on the budget, which Sen­ate Demo­crats have been seek­ing for months. Headed by Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., and House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., the com­mit­tee will im­me­di­ately be­gin de­bat­ing large dif­fer­ences between Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats, start­ing with topline spend­ing levels and wheth­er those levels will in­clude se­quest­ra­tion.

In fact, Mur­ray, Ry­an, Rep. Chris Van Hol­len, D-Md., and Sen. Jeff Ses­sions, R-Ala., are sched­uled to meet over break­fast Thursday to dis­cuss the path for­ward. But many are pess­im­ist­ic that the com­mit­tee can re­solve is­sues that have plagued Con­gress for years in time to re­port back for a mid-Decem­ber dead­line.

Van Hol­len, the rank­ing Demo­crat on the House Budget Com­mit­tee, was already lay­ing down mark­ers for Re­pub­lic­ans on Wed­nes­day. “They shouldn’t think they’re go­ing to be able to use these new dead­lines to make par­tis­an de­mands,” he said.

In­deed, Demo­crats in both cham­bers emerge from the battle with some claim to the up­per hand, with House Re­pub­lic­ans, led by the con­ser­vat­ive wing of the con­fer­ence, hav­ing fallen short of their goals to way­lay the Af­ford­able Care Act, cut man­dat­ory spend­ing, and pur­sue oth­er re­forms.

The one Obama­care-re­lated pro­vi­sion that made it in­to the agree­ment will re­quire the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices sec­ret­ary to cer­ti­fy to Con­gress that prop­er in­come-veri­fic­a­tion pro­ced­ures are in place be­fore any sub­sidies are doled out to Amer­ic­ans who qual­i­fy for fed­er­al help buy­ing in­sur­ance on the new ex­changes. The HHS sec­ret­ary will also be re­quired to re­lease a re­port on Jan. 1, the day the in­di­vidu­al man­date to ob­tain in­sur­ance goes in­to ef­fect, out­lining how the health in­sur­ance mar­ket­places will veri­fy that every­one who re­ceives a sub­sidy qual­i­fies. Fi­nally, the HHS in­spect­or gen­er­al will be re­quired to re­port on how well those veri­fic­a­tion pro­ced­ures are work­ing by Ju­ly 1, 2014.

This is not a ma­jor change to the con­ten­tious 2010 health-re­form law, al­though it will give Con­gress the op­por­tun­ity for ad­di­tion­al over­sight as the re­ports are re­leased — and per­haps ad­di­tion­al fuel for Re­pub­lic­an cri­ti­cism.

In the Sen­ate, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id held his Demo­crats to­geth­er in a hardened de­fense against Re­pub­lic­an de­mands, and was re­war­ded with a chance to ne­go­ti­ate from the high ground on the budget mov­ing for­ward. “The unity was an im­port­ant part of the ul­ti­mate out­come,” said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.

There’s also no doubt that the stan­doff was tough on House Speak­er John Boehner, whose man­age­ment of the House ma­jor­ity was re­peatedly called in­to ques­tion, but who ul­ti­mately won a stand­ing ova­tion from his con­fer­ence — and much praise from in­di­vidu­al Re­pub­lic­ans of all stripes — at a Wed­nes­day meet­ing.

In­deed, many House Re­pub­lic­ans re­fused to bow their heads, say­ing that the stan­doff was a learn­ing ex­per­i­ence that ul­ti­mately drew the con­fer­ence to­geth­er, even if the ef­forts res­ul­ted in what most ex­perts are tal­ly­ing as a loss.

“It’s pretty hard when he has a circle of 20 people that step up every day, and say, “˜Can we sur­render today, Mr. Speak­er?’ “ said Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan., who dis­missed cent­rist Re­pub­lic­ans as “the sur­render caucus.”

He ad­ded: “All they do is whine about the battle, as if they thought be­ing elec­ted to Wash­ing­ton was go­ing to be an easy job.”

But oth­ers said that the stan­doff, which was costly both in polit­ic­al and eco­nom­ic terms (the rat­ings agency Stand­ard & Poor’s es­tim­ated on Wed­nes­day that the shut­down took roughly $24 bil­lion out of the eco­nomy), could im­pact the polit­ic­al cli­mate mov­ing for­ward.

Obama sug­ges­ted Wed­nes­day night that elec­ted lead­ers “need to earn back the trust of the Amer­ic­an people” and “get out of the habit of gov­ern­ing by crisis.”

Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., also said there may have been les­sons learned. As he put it, “Per­haps, mov­ing for­ward, the polit­ics of brink­man­ship [and] of con­front­a­tion have reached their peak.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×