David Grosso’s Defiance: Council Member Emerges as a Champion for D.C. Rights

The council member is part of a new generation of leaders willing to be confrontational with Congress, even if it means breaking the law.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Oct. 17, 2013, 6:49 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4511) }}

Many took note of May­or Vin­cent Gray’s out­spoken ap­proach dur­ing the shut­down, when he did things like crash a Sen­ate press­er at the Cap­it­ol to de­mand that fed­er­al law­makers take up the Dis­trict’s fund­ing bill. Coun­cil mem­ber Dav­id Grosso thinks he didn’t go far enough.

The is­sue at hand was fed­er­al con­trol of the Dis­trict’s budget. the Dis­trict of Columbia is the only jur­is­dic­tion in the United States whose budget and rev­en­ues are con­trolled by Con­gress, and as the fed­er­al shut­down dragged on, the city was run­ning out of emer­gency re­serves. “It’s a new at­ti­tude in D.C.,” Grosso told Na­tion­al Journ­al at the time. “We’re no longer go­ing to ask for per­mis­sion. We’re go­ing to stand up for our rights and spend our loc­al money.”

The shut­down is over now and with it, the fight for con­trol of the D.C. budget. But Grosso and his con­front­a­tion­al ap­proach aren’t go­ing away. He already has his eyes on the next D.C. autonomy fight: the free­dom for D.C. to pass its own le­gis­la­tion without ap­prov­al from Con­gress.

The Dis­trict is the only place in coun­try where le­gis­la­tion must be sent to Con­gress for ap­prov­al be­fore it be­comes law, a pro­cess that can take weeks. While its le­gis­la­tion is al­most al­ways ap­proved without con­flict, mem­bers of Con­gress do have the power to put D.C. laws on hold, as was the case with a bill to leg­al­ize med­ic­al marijuana, which was stalled for years after Con­gress im­posed a rider block­ing money to im­ple­ment the meas­ure.

“My ar­gu­ment would be that we should simply stop send­ing our bills up there for le­gis­lat­ive ap­prov­al,” said Grosso, an at-large coun­cil­man who rep­res­ents all eight wards in the city. “The may­or should sign them and then we should im­ple­ment them.” The polit­ics of it is a bit nu­anced, he ad­mits, since wheth­er D.C. has the leg­al au­thor­ity to do that and wheth­er their laws would have any im­pact at all without ap­prov­al from Con­gress re­main out­stand­ing ques­tions.

“That’s a little trick­i­er,” said Grosso, who stud­ied law at Geor­getown Uni­versity. “I haven’t figured out how I’m gonna do that yet. But I’m work­ing on it.”

The back­drop of course is that due to its des­ig­na­tion as a fed­er­al en­clave, D.C. has long been dis­em­powered, with no vot­ing rep­res­ent­a­tion in Con­gress. The shut­down gave Dis­trict lead­ers a rare op­por­tun­ity to broad­cast their con­stitu­ents’ dis­en­fran­chise­ment at the na­tion­al level. Some, in­clud­ing James Jones, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion D.C. Vote, cred­it Grosso with turn­ing the shut­down in­to a show­down for the Dis­trict.

“I think Dav­id rep­res­ents a new­er gen­er­a­tion of polit­ic­al lead­ers in the Dis­trict who are go­ing to be more con­front­a­tion­al with Con­gress, and we need that,” Jones said. “In­stead of try­ing to play nice all the time, we have to be a little more ag­gress­ive, and if there’s one thing Dav­id is on is­sues he cares about, it’s ag­gress­ive.”

Grosso isn’t the first politi­cian who’s been will­ing to break the law and risk ar­rest for Dis­trict rights. In 2011 a budget deal hammered out between Pres­id­ent Obama and House Speak­er John Boehner in­cluded fund­ing for a con­tro­ver­sial vouch­er pro­gram, des­pite the city’s wishes. It also banned D.C. from spend­ing its own loc­al tax dol­lars on abor­tion ser­vices for low-in­come wo­men.

May­or Gray and sev­er­al mem­bers of the D.C. Coun­cil were ar­res­ted at a Cap­it­ol Hill protest of the ac­tion. But it was a sym­bol­ic ges­ture, meant to il­lus­trate the Dis­trict’s pre­dic­a­ment. Grosso is ad­voc­at­ing something else: dir­ect ac­tion.

“It’s ac­tu­ally the most dir­ect form of civil dis­obedi­ence,” Grosso told Na­tion­al Journ­al at an event hos­ted by D.C. Vote last week. “In­dir­ect is when you block the streets and say we want our rights. Dir­ect is when you ac­tu­ally do something that moves for­ward the is­sue that you care about.”

Grosso was elec­ted to the coun­cil in Novem­ber 2012, after serving as an aide for D.C. coun­cil mem­ber Shar­on Am­brose and later, as a le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or for the Dis­trict’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­ate, Elean­or Holmes Norton. “The coun­cil is for­tu­nate to have Dav­id back, this time in its of­fi­cial lead­er­ship,” Norton said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “After hav­ing served as a staff lead­er in the coun­cil so well that I asked him to be­come my con­gres­sion­al le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or. I am not sur­prised that early on in his ten­ure, Dav­id has be­come an in­flu­en­tial and in­nov­at­ive thinker on the coun­cil.”

Norton praised, among oth­er things, Grosso’s “cool idea to re­name our foot­ball team the Wash­ing­ton Red­tails” and sought to dis­pel any ru­mors that she is try­ing to “in­filt­rate the coun­cil” with her former staff mem­bers, two of whom now serve on the coun­cil. (The oth­er is Kenyan Mc­Duf­fie.)

“I do not en­dorse races in D.C.,” Norton said, “but I must say that I ap­pre­ci­ate how both Dav­id and Kenyan have fo­cused on get­ting money out of polit­ics, a con­cern of mine in the Con­gress.”

Oth­er Dis­trict ad­voc­ates offered more cau­tious praise. D.C. Apple­seed’s Wal­ter Smith said he sup­ports Grosso’s new ap­proach “to the ex­tent it cap­tures a new zeal­ous­ness and as­sert­ive­ness and a will­ing­ness to take strong stands and push the en­vel­ope.”

“Where I won­der about it,” he ad­ded, “is wheth­er in the long run we can suc­cess­fully vi­ol­ate fed­er­al law and make it stick, wheth­er it’s the right strategy if we in fact have leg­al ar­gu­ments in sup­port of what we’re do­ing.”

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.