NRC Pushes Back Key Rulemaking Following Government Shutdown

None

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 29, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — The Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion is push­ing back by three weeks the dead­line for pub­lic com­ments on a con­tro­ver­sial rule that could de­term­ine the fate of all nuc­le­ar power plant li­cens­ing de­cisions.

NRC of­fi­cials an­nounced on Monday that it now will ac­cept com­ments on the so-called “waste con­fid­ence” rule through Dec. 20. The delay is a res­ult of this month’s fed­er­al gov­ern­ment shut­down, which las­ted nearly three weeks and forced the com­mis­sion to post­pone pub­lic meet­ings on the rule that it had planned to hold throughout the coun­try.

Re­vi­sion of the rule was promp­ted by a fed­er­al ap­peals court rul­ing last year. The court sided with the states of New York, Con­necti­c­ut, Mas­sachu­setts and Ver­mont, which ar­gued the com­mis­sion had wrongly as­sumed spent-re­act­or fuel even­tu­ally would move to a per­man­ent waste re­pos­it­ory, even though the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion can­celed the long-delayed Yucca Moun­tain pro­ject in Nevada.

In or­der for the com­mis­sion to li­cense nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies, it must make a reg­u­lat­ory de­term­in­a­tion that it has “con­fid­ence” the waste such fa­cil­it­ies cre­ate will be dis­posed safely. In the ab­sence of a per­man­ent re­pos­it­ory, the court ruled the com­mis­sion must ex­am­ine the po­ten­tial con­sequences of fires in spent fuel pools — where much of the waste cur­rently is stored. Crit­ics have ar­gued the pools are vul­ner­able to ter­ror­ist at­tacks giv­en that they are loc­ated out­side re­act­or’s con­tain­ment struc­tures, and in some cases in an el­ev­ated area they claim is more sus­cept­ible to air at­tacks.

NRC of­fi­cials on Sept. 13 pro­posed a new waste con­fid­ence rule that they claim ad­dresses the court’s con­cerns. It already is prompt­ing cri­ti­cism, with the same group of states that pre­vailed in the ori­gin­al law­suit ar­guing that the scope of a new re­view of the im­pacts of leav­ing waste at plant sites is not as broad as the court man­dated.

In­dustry rep­res­ent­at­ives, mean­while, ar­gue the new rule ad­dresses all the is­sues raised by the court and in some cases goes fur­ther than ne­ces­sary.

Ac­cord­ing to Monday’s an­nounce­ment, com­mis­sion staff will host meet­ings on the rule Nov. 12 in Oak Brook, Ill.; Nov. 18 in Carls­bad, Cal­if.; Nov. 20 in San Lu­is Obispo, Cal­if.; Dec. 2 in Perry­s­burg, Ohio; and Dec. 4 in Min­netonka, Minn. An ad­di­tion­al tele­con­fer­ence will take place on Dec. 9.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×