House Hearing to Focus on Security in the Obamacare Exchange

Issa gets his first opportunity to publicly interrogate HHS since the tumultuous launch of HealthCare.gov.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA), Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID), Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) talk to reporters after the House passed the STEM Jobs Act November 30, 2012.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Nov. 12, 2013, 12:40 p.m.

Wed­nes­day’s House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee hear­ing with Obama’s tech gurus is the cul­min­a­tion of a month­long in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to what went wrong in the rol­lout of Health­Care.gov.

One month ago, com­mit­tee Chair­man Dar­rell Issa, R-Cal­if., began is­su­ing a series of re­quests to the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment for more in­form­a­tion about the im­ple­ment­a­tion of Obama­care.

His first let­ter, sent to HHS Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us on Oct. 10, called the Af­ford­able Care Act’s in­di­vidu­al man­date — a $95 or 1-per­cent-of-in­come pen­alty in 2014 — un­fair to con­sumers if they were barred from sign­ing up for cov­er­age due to Health­Care.gov‘s mal­func­tions. Issa re­ques­ted en­roll­ment data — which is not yet pub­lic, al­though two re­ports Monday sug­gest it could be few­er than 100,000 — and de­tailed in­form­a­tion about the depth of tech­nic­al trouble plaguing the fed­er­al ex­change site and the test­ing that was done in ad­vance of the Oct. 1 launch.

Some of Issa’s ques­tions have since been answered. Se­beli­us test­i­fied to the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee on Oct. 30 that she was aware Health­Care.gov had not been thor­oughly tested be­fore launch, but did not an­ti­cip­ate the level of prob­lems the web­site has en­countered. And a Sept. 26 memo signed by Mar­ilyn Taven­ner, ad­min­is­trat­or of the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices — the HHS agency re­spons­ible for the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the fed­er­al ex­change — in­dic­ated that she was aware of high se­cur­ity risks in the sys­tem.

That sign-off should have come from Tony Trenkle, the CMS tech­no­logy ex­ec­ut­ive in charge of Health­Care.gov‘s se­cur­ity, who an­nounced his resig­na­tion last week. Moreover, Se­beli­us test­i­fied that she was not made aware of Taven­ner’s memo. And on Nov. 1, Henry Chao, the pro­ject man­ager for the fed­er­al health in­sur­ance mar­ket­place, told Issa’s com­mit­tee he had not seen an earli­er se­cur­ity memo — au­thored by Trenkle on Sept. 3 — that de­scribed high se­cur­ity risks. Chao is ex­pec­ted to ap­pear at Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing.

In the weeks since his first let­ter, Issa has sub­poenaed mul­tiple HHS of­fi­cials, in­clud­ing the sec­ret­ary her­self, and began re­leas­ing in­tern­al memos — called “War Room Notes” — that chron­icle the thought pro­cess of the ad­min­is­tra­tion as they dis­covered sys­tem glitches and took meas­ures to fix them.

Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing will give Issa the op­por­tun­ity to an­swer linger­ing ques­tions about the site’s poor design and how the ad­min­is­tra­tion is ac­com­plish­ing fixes — such as the faulty re­gis­tra­tion data sent to in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

But the last time the Over­sight Com­mit­tee met about Obama­care, the hear­ing fo­cused on old griev­ances. Wit­ness Sarah Hall In­gram, former head of the In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice di­vi­sion for tax-ex­empt or­gan­iz­a­tions, watched as the Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats bantered about the singling out of or­gan­iz­a­tions based on ideo­logy. When they fi­nally did turn to her, she was asked wheth­er she was a witch.

Issa has also brought on a wave of cri­ti­cism for re­quir­ing the pres­ence of Todd Park, the White House’s chief tech­no­logy of­ficer, whom he sub­poenaed last week after Park said he would testi­fy in Decem­ber once Health­Care.gov was fixed. Park’s sup­port­ers cre­ated “Let Todd Work,” a cam­paign to keep Park fo­cused on fix­ing Health­Care.gov. Demo­crats on the Over­sight Com­mit­tee asked Issa to with­draw his sub­poena, but the chair­man wrote in his sub­poena that Park’s ap­pear­ance is ne­ces­sary to identi­fy what went wrong and how he will ad­dress se­cur­ity vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies in the site.

Re­gard­less of what the com­mit­tee un­cov­ers, CMS spokes­wo­man Ju­lie Ba­taille has said on daily press calls about the web­site’s re­pairs that the ad­min­is­tra­tion has no in­ten­tion of ex­tend­ing the open-en­roll­ment peri­od or delay the in­di­vidu­al man­date.

“By the end of Novem­ber, the vast ma­jor­ity of users will be able to go smoothly through the pro­cess,” Ba­taille said on Nov. 7.

HHS, CMS, and White House of­fi­cials did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to re­quests for com­ment about the web­site’s se­cur­ity Tues­day af­ter­noon.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×