Why Obamacare May Be Obama’s Katrina, Iraq

The crises don’t compare, but their causes and effects certainly do.

President George W. Bush and president-elect Barack Obama walk through the colonnade November 10, 2008 to the Oval Office at the White House.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Nov. 20, 2013, 10:24 a.m.

We’ve been meas­ur­ing pres­id­ents against each oth­er since John Adams failed in com­par­is­on with the sainted George Wash­ing­ton. His­tor­ic­al ana­logues are nev­er per­fect — no two pres­id­ents or pres­id­en­tial cir­cum­stances are ex­actly the same — but they are in­struct­ive, which is why most lead­ers are stu­dents of his­tory.

Im­per­fect but in­struct­ive — so, too, are com­par­is­ons between Pres­id­ents Bush and Obama, and spe­cific­ally, the causes and ef­fects of their polit­ic­al crises, Kat­rina and Ir­aq for No. 43, Obama­care for No. 44.

In a well-ar­gued ana­lys­is last week, Mi­chael Shear of The New York Times wrote: “The dis­astrous rol­lout of his health care law not only threatens the rest of his agenda but also raises ques­tions about his com­pet­ence in the same way that the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion’s botched re­sponse to Hur­ricane Kat­rina un­der­mined any semb­lance of Re­pub­lic­an ef­fi­ciency.”

Many oth­ers have made the same point (in­clud­ing me here and here). “There’s a qual­it­at­ive dif­fer­ence between people dy­ing in New Or­leans and people not able to get health care,” said former Bush strategist and poll­ster Mat­thew Dowd on ABC’s This Week. “But from a polit­ic­al stand­point, it’s eer­ily sim­il­ar to Pres­id­ent Bush in the fall of 2005.”

Dowd makes two im­port­ant points. First, there is ob­vi­ously no (“qual­it­at­ive”) com­par­is­on between the crises. Hur­ricane Kat­rina killed at least 1,833 people and dam­aged more than $80 bil­lion worth of prop­erty. It was an act of God, not a res­ult of gov­ern­ment in­com­pet­ence to­ward the noble goal of ex­pand­ing health in­sur­ance. The Ir­aq War claimed as many as 500,000 lives and cost hun­dreds of bil­lions of dol­lars. It was fought un­der false pre­tenses: the Bush’s ad­min­is­tra­tion’s claims that Sad­dam Hus­sein har­bored weapons of mass de­struc­tion.

Second, there are in­es­cap­able sim­il­ar­it­ies in the ways that Bush and Obama handled their crises, and those ac­tions changed the pub­lic’s view of their pres­id­en­cies. Spe­cific­ally:

  • Their mis­man­age­ment raised ques­tions about com­pet­ence, com­poun­ded by de­cept­ive and tone-deaf re­sponses that un­der­mined their cred­ib­il­ity.
  • The crises came after a series of un­re­lated events that had already caused doubt among voters about the pres­id­ents. To bor­row a cliché, Kat­rina was the last straw.
  • Their per­son­al and job-ap­prov­al rat­ings tanked.
  • Their dwind­ling polit­ic­al cap­it­al was squandered by de­fens­ive, in­su­lar ad­visers who re­fused to re­cog­nize the dangers.
  • They both ran reelec­tion cam­paigns without a pos­it­ive for­ward-look­ing mes­sage and made the races primar­ily about their op­pon­ent. That left them little polit­ic­al cap­it­al go­ing in­to their second term.

Bush nev­er re­covered. Obama might still have time to learn his­tory’s hard les­sons.

In a book I cowrote with Dowd and Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant Doug Sosnik, we ar­gued: “This we learned from Pres­id­ent Bush in 2005: When a politi­cian loses his cred­ib­il­ity, voters start to ques­tion his oth­er val­ues and even­tu­ally start look­ing at his policies dif­fer­ently. In polit­ics, this can be doom.”

Sound fa­mil­i­ar? So too will these open­ing para­graphs from stor­ies I wrote for the As­so­ci­ated Press dur­ing the Bush pres­id­ency:

Sept. 2, 2005: WASH­ING­TON (AP) — The Ir­aqi in­sur­gency is in its last throes. The eco­nomy is boom­ing. Any­body who leaks a CIA agent’s iden­tity will be fired. Add an­oth­er piece of White House rhet­or­ic that doesn’t match the pub­lic’s view of real­ity: Help is on the way, Gulf Coast.

Sept. 12, 2005: WASH­ING­TON (AP) — The fatally slow re­sponse to Hur­ricane Kat­rina un­leashed a wave of an­ger that could trans­form people’s ex­pect­a­tions of gov­ern­ment, the qual­it­ies they seek in polit­ic­al lead­ers and their views of Amer­ica’s class and ra­cial di­vides. It’s a huge op­por­tun­ity that neither party seems poised to ex­ploit.

Nov. 9, 2005: WASH­ING­TON (AP) — Ir­aq, Kat­rina, CIA leak, Har­riet Miers. Things couldn’t pos­sibly get any worse for Pres­id­ent Bush. Wait, they just did.

March 3, 2006: WASH­ING­TON (AP) — Pres­id­ent Bush vowed, “We are fully pre­pared.” Mike Brown barked or­ders. Weath­er ex­perts warned of a killer storm. The be­hind-the-scenes drama, cap­tured on video­tape as Hur­ricane Kat­rina roared ashore, con­firmed Amer­ic­ans’ sus­pi­cions of gov­ern­ment lead­ers: They can run a good meet­ing, but little else.

Or this one from Janu­ary 2007 after I had left AP: “Pres­id­ent Bush has lost the greatest com­mod­ity a pres­id­ent can pos­sess: The pub­lic’s trust. Scattered with Kat­rina’s winds and bur­ied in the bloody bat­tle­fields of Ir­aq, his cred­ib­il­ity is likely gone forever, which means there will be no polit­ic­al comeback for Bush. His die is cast.”

The Bush White House an­grily ob­jec­ted to these and oth­er stor­ies that pounced on his fail­ures and con­sequences. Most con­ser­vat­ive writers and some me­dia crit­ics ob­jec­ted to the stor­ies, which were part of the AP’s at­tempt to move away from false-equi­val­ence ana­lyses to edgy pieces of “ac­count­ab­il­ity journ­al­ism.”  

The Obama White House is angry and, like the Bush team in 2005, mock­ing and pun­ish­ing re­port­ers who dare to ques­tion their tac­tics or their boss. Obama has his own hosanna chor­us in the me­dia to ri­dicule any com­par­is­ons — just as Bush did.

Once again, a man twice elec­ted to change the cul­ture of Wash­ing­ton is a cap­tive of it. Wait … you could say the same of Bush.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4579) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×