Poll: Minorities Provide Bulk of Support for Obamacare

United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll finds only 16 percent of nonwhites think Congress should repeal the health reform law.

Obamacare supporters react to the U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold President Obama's health care law, on June 28, 2012 in Washington, DC. Today the high court upheld the whole healthcare law of the Obama Administration.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Nov. 21, 2013, 3 p.m.

Minor­it­ies con­tin­ue to of­fer a bul­wark of sup­port for the Af­ford­able Care Act, ac­cord­ing to the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll.

But the deep­en­ing dis­crep­ancy between their views of Obama­care and their sup­port for Pres­id­ent Obama’s reelec­tion last year shows skep­ti­cism about wheth­er the big so­cial-wel­fare pro­gram has worked touched even the White House’s most ar­dent sup­port­ers.

A bat­tery of ques­tions about who be­ne­fits from the health care law, wheth­er it should be re­pealed, and what’s to blame for its rocky rol­lout all re­veal a por­tion of the elect­or­ate that’s far more fa­vor­able to the sweep­ing re­form than the coun­try over­all and their white coun­ter­parts. Giv­en the strong Demo­crat­ic lean of that group, their sup­port is not a sur­prise.

Asked about the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the law, 62 per­cent of non­whites said “the law is ex­per­i­en­cing tem­por­ary prob­lems and will ul­ti­mately pro­duce a bet­ter health care sys­tem.” Just 39 per­cent of whites think the same, while 46 per­cent of all adults share that view.

Not sur­pris­ingly then, just a tiny slice of minor­it­ies — 16 per­cent — think Con­gress should re­peal Obama­care. Forty-two per­cent say law­makers should wait and see how things go be­fore mak­ing ad­just­ments, and 37 per­cent urge them to provide more money for im­ple­ment­a­tion. Among the total pop­u­la­tion, sup­port for out­right re­peal of the law is nearly twice as high, at 38 per­cent. Nearly half of whites, 48 per­cent, feel that way.

Most re­spond­ents doubt the ACA be­ne­fits any­one oth­er than the poor and those without in­sur­ance ““ in­clud­ing a scant 42 per­cent who say it helps the coun­try over­all. But sol­id ma­jor­it­ies of minor­it­ies be­lieve the law helps a wide ar­ray of people, in­clud­ing the middle class (58 per­cent) and seni­or cit­izens (62 per­cent). Fifty-eight per­cent of the group say it helps the coun­try over­all. United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll show­ing that there is a strong ra­cial gap on wheth­er the Af­ford­able Care Act is mak­ing things bet­ter or worse for Amer­ic­ans.

In one ques­tion, re­spond­ents were asked what they would want Con­gress to do if many of the es­tim­ated 50 mil­lion cur­rently un­in­sured Amer­ic­an cit­izens couldn’t re­ceive a health care plan through Obama­care. A sol­id ma­jor­ity of minor­it­ies, 61 per­cent, think the gov­ern­ment should “work to try and make the health care law work bet­ter to cov­er more of the un­in­sured,” com­pared with 44 per­cent of the total pop­u­la­tion. Only 8 per­cent of minor­it­ies say the law should be re­pealed and no ef­fort should be made to cov­er the un­in­sured, com­pared with 16 per­cent of adults over­all who say the same. Thirty per­cent of minor­it­ies, mean­while, sup­port a sep­ar­ate op­tion to “re­peal or sig­ni­fic­antly change the law and try a dif­fer­ent way of cov­er­ing the un­in­sured,” com­pared with 38 per­cent over­all who sup­port that strategy. The lat­ter op­tion likely in­cludes sup­port from some re­spond­ents who prefer a sys­tem such as single-pay­er health care, which would en­sure cov­er­age for all Amer­ic­ans.

The re­l­at­ively strong sup­port of minor­it­ies — along with lib­er­al whites — is largely re­spons­ible for whatever sup­port Obama­care still has after the dis­astrous rol­lout of Health­Care.gov. But that doesn’t mean they’re thrilled with the law, either. Roughly 80 per­cent of the coun­try’s non­white vot­ing pop­u­la­tion sup­por­ted Obama over Mitt Rom­ney in 2012. That’s much lar­ger than the per­cent­age of minor­it­ies who think Obama­care is a good idea. Barely half, 51 per­cent, think the law will make things bet­ter for “people like you and your fam­ily.”

The United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, sur­veyed 1,013 adults by land­line and cell phone from Nov. 14-17. It has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.6 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×