Americans See Little Chance of Better Obama-Congress Relationship in 2014

United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll finds an issue on which Democrats and Republicans agree.

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 27: U.S. President Barack Obama (C) and Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) (2nd R) take part in a ceremony to unveil a statue honoring the late civil rights activist Rosa Parks in Statutory Hall of the U.S. Capitol February 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama was joined by congressional leaders including (L-R) Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). 
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Dec. 4, 2013, 3:42 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans say the re­la­tion­ship between Pres­id­ent Obama and Con­gress was more frayed than usu­al in 2013 — and, if any­thing, only likely to get worse next year.

The first year of Obama’s second term has been marked by a gov­ern­ment shut­down, no sig­ni­fic­ant le­gis­lat­ive achieve­ments, and in­cess­ant bick­er­ing between the ad­min­is­tra­tion and Cap­it­ol Hill, prompt­ing 57 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans to say the White House and Con­gress are co­oper­at­ing less than usu­al, ac­cord­ing to the latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll.

Only 5 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans said Obama and Con­gress co­oper­ated more than usu­al this year. The sur­vey has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.6 per­cent­age points.

With Con­gress on track to pass the few­est new laws this year since at least 1947, Amer­ic­ans are even more pess­im­ist­ic about a re­newed co­oper­at­ive spir­it emer­ging in 2014, when the con­gres­sion­al midterm elec­tions will be held.

While 16 per­cent of poll re­spond­ents said they ex­pec­ted more co­oper­a­tion next year, 60 per­cent said the level of co­oper­a­tion would stay as bad as it is today, and 23 per­cent pre­dicted re­la­tions would de­teri­or­ate even fur­ther.

The fact that Con­gress and the White House don’t get along is the rare is­sue on which Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans agree, with 56 per­cent and 65 per­cent of the two parties, re­spect­ively, say­ing re­la­tions in 2013 are worse than nor­mal.

The Demo­crat­ic pess­im­ism is slightly lower in large part due to the views of blacks and oth­er non­white Amer­ic­ans. Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans were the only demo­graph­ic group in the sur­vey in which even 10 per­cent of re­spond­ents said the level of co­oper­a­tion in 2013 was bet­ter than usu­al, per­haps a re­flec­tion of re­sid­ual good­will to­ward the ef­forts of the na­tion’s first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pres­id­ent.

But at least a plur­al­ity of every demo­graph­ic group in the poll — across all races, ages, in­comes, edu­ca­tion levels, and re­gions — said the pres­id­ent and Con­gress were get­ting along less well than usu­al in 2013.

Still, some not­ably dif­fer­ent per­cep­tions of the cur­rent cli­mate emerged. Mil­len­ni­als, those between 18 and 29, were the most likely to say the cur­rent lack of co­oper­a­tion ranked “about the same as usu­al.” While 43 per­cent of mil­len­ni­als felt that way, only 31 per­cent of those age 50 and over — Amer­ic­ans who have wit­nessed far more pres­id­en­cies — agreed.

Those over 50 are par­tic­u­larly dour about the pro­spects for 2014: 85 per­cent said the level of co­oper­a­tion would either be the same (61 per­cent) or even worse (26 per­cent).

Men and wo­men in the sur­vey were largely in agree­ment, both in rank­ing 2013 as less co­oper­at­ive than nor­mal (58 per­cent and 56 per­cent, re­spect­ively) and in pre­dict­ing that 2014 would bring more of the same (58 per­cent and 61 per­cent, re­spect­ively).

Law­makers and aides on the Hill tend to agree that re­la­tions between the White House and Con­gress are at a low point — they just dis­agree on who is to blame. Obama reached out to Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans this spring and sum­mer through a series of private din­ners at the White House and around Wash­ing­ton, but noth­ing sub­stant­ive emerged from the talks. In­stead, the gov­ern­ment shut down for the first time in 17 years.

Demo­crats blame an in­transigent and in­sur­gent tea party. “Le­gis­la­tion is the art of com­prom­ise, build­ing con­sensus, but we don’t have that now,” Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id told a Las Ve­gas tele­vi­sion sta­tion this week. “The tea party will not al­low Re­pub­lic­ans to com­prom­ise.”

Re­pub­lic­ans blame an aloof and out-of-touch White House. “The Sen­ate and the pres­id­ent con­tin­ue to stand in the way of the Amer­ic­an people’s pri­or­it­ies,” Speak­er John Boehner said on the House floor Wed­nes­day. “When will they learn to say ‘yes’ to com­mon ground?”

Amer­ic­ans don’t see either side co­oper­at­ing much now — or in the near fu­ture.

The United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, sur­veyed 1,003 adults by land­line and cell phone from Nov. 21-24.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4603) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×