The Terrifying Target Data Breach Is Even Worse Than We Thought

Up to 70 million Target customers are now believed to have had their data stolen, up from an original estimate of 40 million.

The massive Target data breach is much larger than first reported last month and has hurt sales, the company announced Friday.  
National Journal
Dustin Volz
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
Jan. 10, 2014, 4:18 a.m.

The his­tor­ic­ally gi­gant­ic data rob­bery from na­tion­wide Tar­get stores nabbed cred­it and deb­it card data from ap­prox­im­ately 70 mil­lion cus­tom­ers, Tar­get an­nounced Fri­day — a fig­ure al­most twice as large as ori­gin­ally re­por­ted.

The new num­ber, up from an earli­er es­tim­ate of 40 mil­lion, does not rep­res­ent an ad­di­tion­al data breach but a re­cal­cu­la­tion based on Tar­get’s own in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the mat­ter, which was first ex­posed by cy­ber­se­cur­ity blog­ger Bri­an Krebs last month. The massive data heist in­cluded names, mail­ing ad­dresses, en­cryp­ted per­son­al iden­ti­fic­a­tion num­bers, and phone num­bers of the cus­tom­ers af­fected.

“I know that it is frus­trat­ing for our guests to learn that this in­form­a­tion was taken, and we are truly sorry they are hav­ing to en­dure this,” said Gregg Stein­hafel, Tar­get’s chair­man, in a state­ment. “I also want our guests to know that un­der­stand­ing and shar­ing the facts re­lated to this in­cid­ent is im­port­ant to me and the en­tire Tar­get team.”

Tar­get, in an at­tempt to lessen an on­go­ing pub­lic-re­la­tions night­mare, said it will con­tin­ue its in­vest­ig­a­tion and prom­ised that “guests will have zero li­ab­il­ity for the cost of any fraud­u­lent charges arising from the breach.” Ad­di­tion­ally, the com­pany has pledged to of­fer one year of free cred­it mon­it­or­ing and identi­fy-theft pro­tec­tion to all cus­tom­ers. Those wish­ing to en­roll for the ser­vices have three months to do so.

Earli­er this week Sen. Thomas Carp­er, D-Del., said he wanted to re­in­tro­duce a bill to cre­ate a na­tion­al re­port­ing stand­ard for data breaches like the one that seized Tar­get. It would ap­ply to re­tail­ers and fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions and re­quire both to tell gov­ern­ment and con­sumers of harm­ful data breaches.

“Con­sumers, gov­ern­ment agen­cies, and busi­nesses of all kinds have proven to be ex­tremely vul­ner­able to fraud and iden­tity theft, and the Tar­get data breach is just the latest ex­ample of this ser­i­ous prob­lem” Carp­er said in a state­ment.

The ori­gin­al breach rev­el­a­tion, which oc­curred dur­ing the hol­i­day shop­ping sea­son, left many won­der­ing wheth­er Tar­get’s growth would be hampered. Today’s an­nounce­ment makes it clear that the com­pany has suffered. Its fourth-quarter out­look up­date notes “mean­ing­fully weak­er-than-ex­pec­ted sales since the [data breach] an­nounce­ment. Tar­get also an­nounced it is also clos­ing eight stores around the coun­try.

Shares of Tar­get stock had dropped more than 1 per­cent Fri­day morn­ing.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×