Feds: NSA “˜Probably’ Spies on Members of Congress

The admission is hardly surprising, but expect lawmakers to feign outrage anyway.

Civil liberties activists hold a rally against surveillance of US citizens as US President Barack Obama is expected to announce reforms of the National Security Agency (NSA) at the Justice Department in Washington on January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 4, 2014, 8:12 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4709) }}

The Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency “prob­ably” col­lects phone re­cords of mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffs, a seni­or Justice De­part­ment of­fi­cial con­ceded Tues­day.

Deputy At­tor­ney Gen­er­al James Cole buckled un­der ques­tion­ing from mul­tiple law­makers dur­ing a House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee hear­ing re­view­ing pro­pos­als to re­form the NSA’s sur­veil­lance activ­ity.

Rep. Zoe Lof­gren, a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat, began by ask­ing Peter Swire, a mem­ber of the pres­id­ent’s hand­picked sur­veil­lance re­view board, wheth­er law­makers’ num­bers are in­cluded in the agency’s phone-re­cords sweeps. Swire pro­tested that he was not a gov­ern­ment of­fi­cial and couldn’t best an­swer the ques­tion, but said he was un­aware of any mech­an­ism that “scrubbed out” mem­ber phone num­bers from the agency’s data haul.

Lof­gren’s time ex­pired and Rep. Dar­rell Issa, a Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an, then put the ques­tion to Cole.

“Mr. Cole, do you col­lect 202, 225, and four di­gits af­ter­wards?” Issa asked, re­fer­ring to the pre­fixes used to call con­gres­sion­al of­fices.

“We prob­ably do, Mr. Con­gress­man,” Cole re­spon­ded. “But we’re not al­lowed to look at any of those, however, un­less we have reas­on­able, ar­tic­ul­able sus­pi­cion that those num­bers are re­lated to a known ter­ror­ist threat.”

While the ad­mis­sion is hardly sur­pris­ing, giv­en that the rais­on d’être of the NSA’s sweeps is to col­lect data of vir­tu­ally all Amer­ic­ans, it may mark the first time the gov­ern­ment has re­spon­ded so dir­ectly to the ques­tion.

Sev­er­al mem­bers of Con­gress have re­cently agit­ated to know wheth­er their phone re­cords are in­cluded in the NSA’s sweep­ing data grabs. Last month, Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Ver­mont in­de­pend­ent, sent a let­ter to NSA Dir­ect­or Keith Al­ex­an­der ask­ing wheth­er Con­gress was spied on.

In re­sponse, Al­ex­an­der said that “noth­ing NSA does can be fairly char­ac­ter­ized as ‘spy­ing on mem­bers of Con­gress or oth­er Amer­ic­an elec­ted of­fi­cials.’ ” His let­ter did not ex­pli­citly say wheth­er con­gres­sion­al phone re­cords were gathered, however.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×