What Jan Brewer’s Gay Bill Veto Means for Arizona — and the Country

By choosing to veto, Brewer has helped restore part of the state’s reputation and delivered a loud warning shot to social conservatives.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 26, 2014, 2:49 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4767) }}

Ari­zona Gov. Jan Brew­er on Wed­nes­day night ve­toed her state’s con­tro­ver­sial bill that would let busi­nesses re­fuse ser­vice to gay and les­bi­an cus­tom­ers on re­li­gious grounds be­cause it “does not ad­dress a spe­cif­ic or press­ing con­cern re­lated to re­li­gious liberty.”

“Re­li­gious liberty is a core Amer­ic­an and Ari­zona value. So is nondis­crim­in­a­tion,” Brew­er said dur­ing a press con­fer­ence at the state Cap­it­ol. “After weigh­ing all of the ar­gu­ments, I have ve­toed Sen­ate Bill 1062 mo­ments ago.”

The Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor had little choice but to turn back a two-page bill that had drawn in­tense na­tion­al scru­tiny since its pas­sage by the state Le­gis­lature last week. In ad­di­tion to mass protests in the state, sev­er­al or­gan­iz­a­tions and busi­nesses had strongly urged Brew­er to hand down a veto. The Na­tion­al Foot­ball League was re­portedly con­sid­er­ing mov­ing next year’s Su­per Bowl from the state if Brew­er signed the bill in­to law.

In ad­di­tion, both of Ari­zona’s sen­at­ors, Re­pub­lic­ans John Mc­Cain and Jeff Flake, had pressed Brew­er to kill the bill. Mitt Rom­ney pushed for a veto, and three Re­pub­lic­an state sen­at­ors who ori­gin­ally voted for the meas­ure suc­cumbed to polit­ic­al pres­sure and re­versed their po­s­i­tions.

Close ob­serv­ers of Ari­zona polit­ics will find the veto un­sur­pris­ing, and yet it’s an­oth­er ex­ample of Brew­er’s meth­od­ic­al polit­ic­al cal­cu­lus that has defined her ten­ure as gov­ernor, an of­fice she as­sumed after Janet Na­pol­it­ano resigned in 2009 to lead the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment.

The veto will help sal­vage some of Ari­zona’s tar­nished repu­ta­tion, which has been un­deni­ably battered in re­cent years, be­gin­ning with Brew­er’s de­cision in 2010 to sign a “self-de­port­a­tion” law against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion that drew wide­spread con­dem­na­tion but also helped her se­cure reelec­tion that year. Key sec­tions of that law were struck down by the Su­preme Court in 2012, and cost Ari­zona an es­tim­ated $140 mil­lion in lost rev­en­ue due to boy­cotts.

Ari­zona’s na­tion­al im­age con­tin­ued to de­teri­or­ate, however. In 2011, a gun­man opened fire at a con­stitu­ent event in Tuc­son for then-Rep. Gab­ri­elle Gif­fords, killing six and wound­ing 13, in­clud­ing Gif­fords. The vi­ol­ence garnered in­tense na­tion­al at­ten­tion and promp­ted Pima County Sher­iff Clar­ence Dupnik to de­clare that “Ari­zona is the mecca for pre­ju­dice and bigotry.”

But today, Ari­zona is not go­ing to be de­rided as a place of pre­ju­dice or bigotry. By choos­ing not to sign, Brew­er has gone from a gov­ernor who helped se­cure her state’s repu­ta­tion­al de­mise in 2010, when rhet­or­ic against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion reached its apex, to a gov­ernor who pre­ven­ted an­oth­er wave of eco­nom­ic boy­cotts and en­dur­ing scru­tiny, a move un­der­scor­ing just how much polit­ics on so­cial is­sues — es­pe­cially gay rights — have changed around the coun­try.

“I call them like I see them,” Brew­er said. “Des­pite the cheers or boos from the crowd.” 

As an ac­ci­dent­al Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor who be­came the face of a charged move­ment against il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion in 2010, as a fierce, fin­ger-wag­ging en­emy to the feds, and as an un­likely cham­pi­on of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act, Brew­er has al­ways done ex­actly that. Es­pe­cially when the cam­er­as are watch­ing.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4768) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
20 hours ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.