House Prepares Vote on ‘Watered-Down’ NSA Reform Bill As Privacy Groups Drop Support

Ahead of a Thursday vote on the House floor, groups that once embraced the USA Freedom Act are now running from it.

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
May 20, 2014, 12:38 p.m.

Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates are quickly pulling their sup­port from a newly amended bill in­ten­ded to lim­it the gov­ern­ment’s mass col­lec­tion of Amer­ic­ans’ phone re­cords.

A new ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act was re­leased Tues­day, the cul­min­a­tion of more than a week of in­tense back­door ne­go­ti­ations among House lead­er­ship, the White House, and the in­tel­li­gence com­munity.

The House will vote on the meas­ure on Thursday, a spokes­man for Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor said. But back­ers of gov­ern­ment-sur­veil­lance re­form wasted no time con­demning the changes.

“House lead­ers should have al­lowed a vote on the com­prom­ise ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act that was already agreed to, rather than un­der­min­ing their own mem­bers and cav­ing in to the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s de­mands,” said Kev­in Bank­ston, the policy dir­ect­or of the New Amer­ica Found­a­tion’s Open Tech­no­logy In­sti­tute, in a state­ment. “We can­not in good con­science sup­port this weakened ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act, where key re­forms — es­pe­cially those in­ten­ded to end bulk col­lec­tion and in­crease trans­par­ency — have been sub­stan­tially watered down.”

Har­ley Gei­ger, a seni­or coun­sel at the Cen­ter for Demo­cracy & Tech­no­logy, said his group was also with­draw­ing its sup­port for the bill due to its loose defin­i­tion of a “spe­cif­ic se­lec­tion term,” which provides a basis for how nar­rowly in­tel­li­gence agen­cies would be re­quired to define se­lec­ted tar­gets when con­duct­ing a search of phone re­cords.

The new lan­guage “might lim­it na­tion­wide sur­veil­lance, but does not clearly lim­it this au­thor­ity for area codes or cit­ies,” Gei­ger said. “It would provide for an un­ac­cept­able level of sur­veil­lance in a bill that is sup­posed to re­form broad gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance.”

Oth­er back­ers of sur­veil­lance re­form took to Twit­ter to ex­press sim­il­ar frus­tra­tion. The flurry of with­draw­als “mir­ror law­makers’ grow­ing con­cerns” about the bill, a spokes­man for Rep. Zoe Lof­gren, a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat, said.

The com­prom­ise fur­ther moves the goal­posts on cer­tain pri­vacy and trans­par­ency meas­ures to­ward what na­tion­al se­cur­ity hawks wanted, even after they scored sev­er­al con­ces­sions earli­er this month when an amended bill passed out of the House Ju­di­ciary and In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees.

The bill, au­thored by Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, still would not al­low bulk, lim­it­less col­lec­tion of all phone metadata — the num­bers and time stamps of a call but not its con­tents — but its defin­i­tion of when gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials are al­lowed to search those re­cords has been widened from earli­er agreed-upon lan­guage, ad­voc­ates say. In ad­di­tion, a trans­par­ency pro­vi­sion that spe­cifies how much tech com­pan­ies can dis­close about the gov­ern­ment’s re­quests of user data falls short of what many had hoped. 

The amended Free­dom Act, which was also filed by Sensen­bren­ner, is slated for con­sid­er­a­tion in the Rules Com­mit­tee on Tues­day af­ter­noon. Sources on and off Cap­it­ol Hill said they were skep­tic­al the vote would al­low an open-amend­ment de­bate.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×