Hard-Core Antiwar Left Not Ready to Forgive Hillary Clinton

For some activists who cut their teeth opposing the Iraq War, Clinton will always be a “warmonger.”

Anti-war groups hold a demonstration against a US intervention in Iraq in front of the White House in Washington on June 16, 2014. 
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
June 17, 2014, 11:57 a.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton may have fi­nally re­can­ted on her 2002 Sen­ate vote to au­thor­ize the in­va­sion of Ir­aq, but in the eyes of the die-hard an­ti­war act­iv­ists who gathered Monday even­ing in front of the White House to protest an­oth­er po­ten­tial mil­it­ary con­flict with the coun­try, the former sec­ret­ary of State can nev­er apo­lo­gize enough.

“We’re not go­ing to for­give her, des­pite her best ef­fort to white­wash her his­tory,” said Bri­an Beck­er, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the an­ti­war AN­SWER Co­ali­tion, which formed in the run-up to the Ir­aq War. “We con­sider Hil­lary Clin­ton to be al­most a part of the neo­con­ser­vat­ive es­tab­lish­ment.”

About 40 act­iv­ists un­furled ban­ners and beat drums in front of the White House as Pres­id­ent Obama pre­pared to send 275 troops in­to Ir­aq to de­fend Amer­ic­an in­terests against a po­ten­tial as­sault on Bagh­dad from Is­lam­ist mil­it­ants who have taken con­trol of much of the coun­try.

The pro­test­ers uni­ver­sally viewed Clin­ton’s dis­own­er­ship of her Ir­aq vote as mo­tiv­ated by po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial am­bi­tions, rather than a genu­ine change of heart. That vote helped stop her last pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, and is already caus­ing heart­burn for a likely 2016 bid, now that Ir­aq is back in the news.

“Bot­tom line: You can al­ways count on Hil­lary to say the most polit­ic­ally res­on­ant thing of the mo­ment,” said Ray McGov­ern, a former seni­or CIA of­ficer turned an­ti­war pro­test­er who was ar­res­ted in 2011 (and he claims beaten) for protest­ing dur­ing a Clin­ton speech. “It’s bad enough to have that kind of per­son as sec­ret­ary of State; do we really want her to be the pres­id­ent of the United States? I don’t think so. She’s a men­ace.”

As sec­ret­ary of State, Clin­ton was of­ten in the hawk­ish wing of Pres­id­ent Obama’s Cab­in­et, sup­port­ing air strikes in Libya and arms de­liv­er­ies to rebels in Syr­ia. Robert Kagan, the vet­er­an sage of in­ter­ven­tion­ist for­eign policy, re­cently gave a thumbs up to Clin­ton’s for­eign policy, telling The New York Times that it’s “something that might have been called neo­con.”

Eu­gene Puryear, a far-left act­iv­ist who is run­ning for an at-large seat on the Dis­trict of Columbia Coun­cil, said there’s “ab­so­lutely no chance” he could sup­port Clin­ton. Her lat­ter-day ad­mis­sion that the vote was a mis­take is “highly op­por­tun­ist­ic … ab­surd and really of­fens­ive,” ad­ded Puryear, whose in­terest in polit­ics star­ted when he at­ten­ded an anti-Ir­aq War march dur­ing high school.

Gerry Con­don, the vice pres­id­ent of Vet­er­ans for Peace, was some­what more sym­path­et­ic, say­ing he thought Clin­ton had “learned her les­son,” but said he could still nev­er sup­port her. “We would wel­come her be­com­ing a politi­cian who ac­tu­ally sup­ports dip­lomacy, but I’m not go­ing to hold my breath,” he said.

The prob­lem, these act­iv­ists read­ily ac­know­ledged, is that there’s no clear al­tern­at­ive for them. Some said they were in­ter­ested in a po­ten­tial bid from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., while oth­ers said they were resigned to vote for a third-party can­did­ate.

Phyl­lis Ben­nis, of the pro­gress­ive In­sti­tute for Policy Stud­ies think tank, said that to cap­ture the an­ti­war vote, any can­did­ate would need to not only re­nounce the Ir­aq War, but op­pose it’s leg­al found­a­tion, the Au­thor­iz­a­tion for the Mil­it­ary Use of Force, which Con­gress passed shortly after the Septem­ber 11th ter­ror­ist at­tacks.

“Without that, I don’t think any can­did­ate could ex­pect to get any sup­port from the an­ti­war move­ment that helped get Obama in­to of­fice,” she said after a brief speech at the rally.

Carlo Chav­ar­ría, a 21-year-old rising seni­or at Amer­ic­an Uni­versity, said there’s no way he’d vote for Clin­ton in 2016. “She seems so pro­gress­ive on oth­er is­sues,” he said, but when it comes to for­eign policy, “she’s a war­mon­ger.”

Two oth­er young at­tendees — Colleen Moore, a 20-year-old ju­ni­or at Hobart Wil­li­am Smith Col­lege, and Ben Norton, a 22-year-old freel­ance writer who lives in Wash­ing­ton — agreed. “I will not sup­port her,” Norton said.

The co­ali­tion of groups rep­res­en­ted here, com­fort­able be­ing at the fringes of polit­ics, clearly feel em­boldened after the U.S. scrapped po­ten­tial air strikes against the As­sad re­gime in Syr­ia last fall. “It’s very sad that we have to be out again, and I think a lot of us are in shock that we are out here again, but let’s re­mem­ber that we did stop an in­va­sion of Syr­ia!” Code­Pink cofounder Medea Ben­jamin said over a loud­speak­er to cheers from the crowd.

“Is she the same Hil­lary?” Ben­jamin said with a laugh, as if the an­swer was ob­vi­ous, when asked about the po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate after the rally. “This is polit­ics.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×