Sen. Feinstein Rips Obama on Redacted Torture Report

“I will not rush this process,” the California Democrat said.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks on Capitol Hill on June 4. On Tuesday, Feinstein's Senate Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee approved a fiscal 2015 spending bill.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Aug. 5, 2014, 1 p.m.

The Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee will not make its find­ings on Bush-era “en­hanced in­ter­rog­a­tion” pro­grams avail­able to the pub­lic un­til the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion can ex­plain why it heav­ily re­dac­ted por­tions of the pan­el’s re­port on CIA tor­ture tech­niques.

Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein is un­sat­is­fied with the amount of re­dac­ted ma­ter­i­al, say­ing the re­port will stay clas­si­fied un­til the ad­min­is­tra­tion can ex­plain the black­outs.

“After fur­ther re­view of the re­dac­ted ver­sion of the ex­ec­ut­ive sum­mary, I have con­cluded the re­dac­tions elim­in­ate or ob­scure key facts that sup­port the re­port’s find­ings and con­clu­sions,” the power­ful Cali­for­nia Demo­crat said in a state­ment Tues­day. “Un­til these re­dac­tions are ad­dressed to the com­mit­tee’s sat­is­fac­tion, the re­port will not be made pub­lic.”

Last week, the White House re­turned the so-called “tor­ture re­port” to the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, but Fein­stein said she would need to re­view the re­dac­tions be­fore de­cid­ing wheth­er to make the re­port pub­lic. Oth­er sen­at­ors blas­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion for at­tempt­ing to con­ceal em­bar­rass­ing de­tails con­tained in the pan­el’s 500-page ex­ec­ut­ive sum­mary of the lar­ger study.

“Re­dac­tions are sup­posed to re­move names or any­thing that could com­prom­ise sources and meth­ods, not to un­der­mine the source ma­ter­i­al so that it is im­possible to un­der­stand,” said Sen. Mar­tin Hein­rich, a New Mex­ico Demo­crat, in a state­ment. “Try read­ing a nov­el with 15 per­cent of the words blacked out. It can’t be done prop­erly.”

In re­sponse to the back­lash, Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per jus­ti­fied the de­le­tions as ne­ces­sary and noted that half of them were made in the doc­u­ment’s foot­notes.

But Fein­stein is de­mand­ing more an­swers and is un­will­ing to re­lease the re­port as it cur­rently stands.

“I am send­ing a let­ter today to the pres­id­ent lay­ing out a series of changes to the re­dac­tions that we be­lieve are ne­ces­sary pri­or to pub­lic re­lease,” Fein­stein said. “This pro­cess will take some time, and the re­port will not be re­leased un­til I am sat­is­fied that all re­dac­tions are ap­pro­pri­ate.”

She con­tin­ued: “The bot­tom line is that the United States must nev­er again make the mis­takes doc­u­mented in this re­port. … That is why I be­lieve tak­ing our time and get­ting it right is so im­port­ant, and I will not rush this pro­cess.”

Also on Tues­day, Sen. Carl Lev­in, a Michigan Demo­crat, cri­ti­cized the re­dac­tions as “totally un­ac­cept­able.” He ad­ded that there was “mul­tiple in­stances where CIA pro­poses to re­dact in­form­a­tion that has already been pub­licly dis­closed” in a 2009 re­port on de­tain­ee ab­use writ­ten by the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, which Lev­in chairs.

The tor­ture re­port, some of which has been leaked already, is widely be­lieved to con­clude that the CIA’s use of wa­ter­board­ing and oth­er “en­hanced in­ter­rog­a­tion” prac­tices yiel­ded little to no valu­able na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­form­a­tion that could not have oth­er­wise been ob­tained us­ing more tra­di­tion­al in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing meth­ods.

On Fri­day, Pres­id­ent Obama re­ferred to the re­port dur­ing a press con­fer­ence, in­dic­at­ing at the time that its re­lease was im­min­ent. Obama also con­demned the in­ter­rog­a­tion pro­tocol used by the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, which he banned when he took of­fice.

“In the im­me­di­ate af­ter­math of 9/11, we did some things that were wrong,” Obama said. “We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tor­tured some folks. We did some things that were con­trary to our val­ues.”

Fein­stein’s salvo is just the latest in an on­go­ing feud between her pan­el and the CIA.

Last week, the CIA ad­mit­ted it im­prop­erly ac­cessed com­puters used by Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence staffers to in­vest­ig­ate the spy agency’s de­ten­tion, rendi­tion, and in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices de­ployed dur­ing George W. Bush’s pres­id­ency. CIA Dir­ect­or John Bren­nan de­term­ined that his em­ploy­ees “ac­ted in a man­ner in­con­sist­ent with the com­mon un­der­stand­ing” brokered between his agency and its Sen­ate over­seers.

At least three sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Hein­rich, have asked for Bren­nan to step down.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×