Bridgegate, the Sequel

The Christie administration is facing inquiry over a bridge. Again.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie attends his election night event after winning a second term at the Asbury Park Convention Hall on November 05, 2013 in Asbury Park, New Jersey. Incumbent Governor Chris Christie defeated his Democratic opponent Barbara Buono by a commanding margin. 
Getty Images
Lucia Graves
June 24, 2014, 6:51 a.m.

In­vest­ig­a­tions in­to Chris Christie’s “Bridgeg­ate” scan­dal, the polit­ic­ally mo­tiv­ated lane clos­ings at the George Wash­ing­ton Bridge last year, have yiel­ded some de­cidedly bad news for the New Jer­sey gov­ernor: An­oth­er Christie bridge scan­dal at a com­pletely dif­fer­ent bridge.

In this new chapter of the Christie saga, in­vest­ig­at­ors are point­ing to se­cur­it­ies-law vi­ol­a­tions in a $1.8 bil­lion road-re­pair agree­ment from 2011, ac­cord­ing to re­port­ing in The New York Times. This time the in­quir­ies are centered around the Pu­laski Sky­way, the dilap­id­ated road­way con­nect­ing Ne­wark to Jer­sey City. The Christie ad­min­is­tra­tion sought to re­pair the crum­bling thor­ough­fare by di­vert­ing Port Au­thor­ity funds from a new Hud­son River rail tun­nel can­celed by Christie in the fall of 2010.

Port Au­thor­ity law­yers warned the Christie ad­min­is­tra­tion that the Pu­laski Sky­way, which is owned and op­er­ated by the state, falls out­side of the agency’s pur­view. Christie’s team jus­ti­fied the spend­ing by call­ing the road an ac­cess way to the Lin­coln Tun­nel (something that does fall un­der agency pur­view), al­though the two aren’t con­nec­ted. Soon after, Port Au­thor­ity law­yers changed their tune, al­ter­ing a memo to say the agency did in fact have au­thor­ity over the pro­ject. “We are now say­ing we have le­gis­lat­ive au­thor­ity,” the re­vised doc­u­ment read, ac­cord­ing to The Times.

The scan­dal du jour isn’t nearly as polit­ic­ally dam­aging as the scan­dal last fall. The mo­tiv­a­tions ap­pear to be sig­ni­fic­antly less trans­par­ent than they were for Bridgeg­ate (there is no re­tri­bu­tion against politi­cians who al­legedly didn’t go along with a Christie en­dorse­ment). Yet the whole thing smacks of a fa­mil­i­ar ab­use of au­thor­ity by the Christie ad­min­is­tra­tion, and that’s a place where the polit­ic­al dam­age has already been done.

Ac­cord­ing to Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Polit­ic­al In­siders Poll, just 2 per­cent of Demo­crat­ic re­spond­ents pre­dict Christie, once a fa­vor­ite to win the nom­in­a­tion, will be the Re­pub­lic­an pick for pres­id­ent in 2016. The long list of names ahead of him in­cludes Jeb Bush, John Kasich, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Paul Ry­an, Rick San­tor­um, and Scott Walk­er. Re­pub­lic­ans, mean­while, have been a bit more loathe to cast his 2016 chances as dead. The poll shows 11 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­an re­spond­ents pre­dicted he’d win the nom­in­a­tion, put­ting him in third place be­hind Jeb Bush and Marco Ru­bio.

One Re­pub­lic­an in­sider ima­gined Christie’s comeback as fol­lows: “Christie emerges from the ove­rhyped bridge-clos­ing is­sue and shows Re­pub­lic­ans what a full-spec­trum con­ser­vat­ive can ac­com­plish when prag­mat­ism and mov­ing the ball for­ward tri­umphs over lit­mus tests that keep us from even break­ing the huddle.” Any­thing’s pos­sible, but the tea leaves are look­ing in­creas­ingly hos­tile to that in­ter­pret­a­tion.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.