Preparing for Rough Midterms, Democratic Groups Already Blaming Each Other

Says one progressive strategist: “This is a coming divide for the Democratic Party.”

Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren checks out the podium the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, NC.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
March 30, 2014, 8 a.m.

Bra­cing for a rough midterm-elec­tion out­come, Demo­crats aren’t wait­ing un­til Elec­tion Day to start blam­ing one an­oth­er for the party’s prob­lems. An­ti­cip­at­ing the pos­sib­il­ity that Re­pub­lic­ans will flip the Sen­ate, the fin­ger-point­ing game is already un­der­way between the party’s war­ring fac­tions.

Earli­er this month, Daily Kos founder Markos Moulit­sas ar­gued lib­er­als had suc­cess­fully purged so-called squishy mod­er­ates from the Demo­crat­ic Party’s ranks — even if those same law­makers had helped the party re­tain con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing Sen­ate and House seats. From the middle, the cent­rist Demo­crat­ic think tank Third Way has be­come more out­spoken in cri­ti­ciz­ing pro­gress­ive lead­ers, in­clud­ing Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren and New York City May­or Bill de Bla­sio, for ad­voc­at­ing an agenda that will com­prom­ise the party’s abil­ity to at­tract mod­er­ate voters.

The pub­lic spats between out­side groups are noth­ing com­pared with the private fin­ger-point­ing over who could be re­spons­ible if Re­pub­lic­ans ride a polit­ic­al wave this year. The mod­er­ate wing is pre­pared to blame the party for avoid­ing cent­rist ini­ti­at­ives like free-trade deals and en­ti­tle­ment re­form, while the Left will ar­gue party lead­ers didn’t do enough to pro­tect be­ne­fits.

“This is a com­ing di­vide for the Demo­crat­ic Party,” said one pro­gress­ive strategist, who was gran­ted an­onym­ity to speak can­didly. “Not only about ex­plain­ing 2014, but lay­ing the ground­work for 2016.”

The split between the party’s pro­gress­ive and cent­rist wings isn’t new, and the loom­ing dif­fi­culty of the midterms play only a part in their on­go­ing con­flict. But the threat of losses later this year is ex­acer­bat­ing the ex­ist­ing ten­sions.

In Third Way cofounder Matt Ben­nett’s telling, it wasn’t a lack of pop­u­lism that caused the party’s prob­lems. It was an in­cess­ant fo­cus on class-war rhet­or­ic in 2013 that re­pelled some voters.

“Demo­crats lost touch with the middle class,” he said. “We en­gaged in ar­gu­ments that have in­tel­lec­tu­al but not emo­tion­al res­on­ance. In­come in­equal­ity is a prob­lem, but that doesn’t make it something that will land in pub­lic,” Ben­nett said.

Ben­nett’s group has led the charge for Demo­crat­ic law­makers and the pres­id­ent to back a so­cially lib­er­al but eco­nom­ic­ally cent­rist plat­form — and in do­ing so, has be­come en­emy No. 1 of many act­iv­ists.

Alex Lawson, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of So­cial Se­cur­ity Works, was blunt in his re­but­tal: Pres­id­ent Obama’s flir­ta­tion with a so-called grand bar­gain — an agree­ment of­fer­ing Re­pub­lic­ans the op­tion of re­du­cing the growth of fu­ture So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fits by cal­cu­lat­ing pay­ments us­ing chained CPI — com­prom­ised the Demo­crat­ic at­tack line against Re­pub­lic­ans over en­ti­tle­ment cuts.

He poin­ted to March’s spe­cial House elec­tion in Flor­ida as evid­ence. The Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee there, Alex Sink, at­tacked Re­pub­lic­an Dav­id Jolly for want­ing to privat­ize and cut the en­ti­tle­ment pro­gram. But the GOP shot back that Sink, who ul­ti­mately suffered a dis­ap­point­ing de­feat, had once voiced sup­port for cut­ting So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fits her­self.

It’s part of the lar­ger pro­gress­ive ar­gu­ment that Obama failed to ar­tic­u­late a pos­it­ive vis­ion to pro­tect en­ti­tle­ments for the work­ing-class as a sup­ple­ment to his fre­quent re­bukes of Re­pub­lic­ans and Wall Street for their eco­nom­ic views.

“Now the wa­ter is muddy. Nobody knows which side is ac­tu­ally fight­ing to pro­tect So­cial Se­cur­ity,” Lawson said.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4850) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.