This Is Rand Paul’s Moment

The Kentucky Republican struck out on his own in his response to the State of the Union. Here’s why.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) speaks to members of the media on January 9, 2014 at the White House in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Jan. 29, 2014, midnight

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4693) }}

The United States is hav­ing a liber­tari­an mo­ment. And Rand Paul is get­ting ready to cap­ture it by him­self.

The Ken­tucky Re­pub­lic­an de­livered his own re­sponse to Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on on Tues­day night via You­Tube. But the re­but­tal wasn’t so much about what Obama said Tues­day as much as it was an open­ing salvo for a pos­sible 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, the bulk of it com­ing as a dir­ec­ted ar­gu­ment against big gov­ern­ment.

“Gov­ern­ment doesn’t cre­ate jobs very well,” Paul said. “Gov­ern­ment is in­her­ently bad at pick­ing win­ners and losers … if gov­ern­ment is to send money to cer­tain people to cre­ate busi­nesses, they will more of­ten than not pick the wrong people, and no jobs will be cre­ated.” He poin­ted spe­cific­ally to the old big gov­ern­ment bo­gey­man, Solyn­dra.

“It’s not that gov­ern­ment’s in­her­ently stu­pid, al­though it’s a de­bat­able point,” Paul said. “It’s that gov­ern­ment doesn’t get the same sig­nals.”

Paul’s Tues­day speech wasn’t sponsored by the GOP (that hon­or went to Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Ro­gers) or the tea party (that was Sen. Mike Lee’s job). The per­son­al­ized setup provided for a much more visu­ally ap­peal­ing de­liv­ery, com­plete with con­trolled light­ing and a lectern. A year after giv­ing the of­fi­cial tea-party re­sponse, Paul has struck out on his own.

The move makes sense. A Tues­day NBC News/Wall Street Journ­al poll found that twice as many Amer­ic­ans feel neg­at­ively about the Re­pub­lic­an Party than feel pos­it­ively. As a politi­cian, why tie your­self to that stand­ard when you can use your own, already-mo­bil­ized base to go it alone, at least be­fore primary sea­son really kicks up?

And there’s plenty reas­on to think Paul is per­fectly placed to cap­ture a slice of the cur­rent Amer­ic­an agita. Con­sider this: What’s the greatest, most ex­ist­en­tial threat to the United States — big busi­ness, big labor, or big gov­ern­ment? In Decem­ber, a re­cord 72 per­cent said big gov­ern­ment in a Gal­lup Poll, blow­ing past busi­ness (21 per­cent) and labor (5 per­cent). The ma­jor­it­ies hold des­pite polit­ics, but 92 per­cent of self-iden­ti­fied Re­pub­lic­ans cite big gov­ern­ment as the biggest threat to the fu­ture of Amer­ica.

Think of Rand Paul as the anti-Bill de Bla­sio. In his Tues­day speech, Paul slammed the “polit­ics of envy” and sug­ges­ted that if you “pun­ish” the suc­cess­ful, their com­pan­ies will flee over­seas. He pushed a some­what anti-wel­fare mes­sage, high­light­ing the story of the an­ti­gay, fringey Star Park­er, who says she once used her wel­fare money on drugs be­fore turn­ing her life around. While New York­ers are highly op­tim­ist­ic about de Bla­sio just a few weeks in­to his lib­er­al may­or­alty, Paul’s tak­ing the bet that what flies in New York won’t fly in the coun­try over­all. Again, there’s a polit­ic­al lo­gic here: While 67 per­cent of Demo­crats say gov­ern­ment should do “a lot” to re­duce poverty, only 27 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans agree.

By all ac­counts, Paul is gun­ning for the top spot. In his Tues­day night re­sponse, Paul made policy pro­pos­als of his own, in­clud­ing those for eco­nom­ic free­dom aones that would be set up around the U.S. and have, among oth­er things, a flat 5 per­cent in­come and busi­ness tax. “I be­lieve in an Amer­ica where people are free to make their own de­cisions,” he said.

And earli­er in the day, he took digs at the pos­sible com­pet­i­tion. At Tues­day’s State of the Net con­fer­ence in D.C., Paul bashed former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton as a “big pro­ponent of the sur­veil­lance state,” and sug­ges­ted that a liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate in 2016 could “com­pletely trans­form where people think they are and what party people think they have al­le­gi­ance for.”

It’s an early 2016 cam­paign shot, and it’s not off base, either. Gov­ern­ment was men­tioned as the most im­port­ant prob­lem in the U.S. across all party IDs in a re­cent Gal­lup Poll, cited by 18 per­cent of Demo­crats. A whop­ping 65 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans say they’re dis­sat­is­fied with the U.S. sys­tem of gov­ern­ment and its ef­fect­ive­ness. However, many of the people who are up­set over cur­rent gov­ern­ment ef­fect­ive­ness are also surely no fans of the fili­bus­ter­ing Paul.

Paul’s speech was broad­cast on­line in­stead of aired on na­tion­al tele­vi­sion, and it’s not the sort of thing that’s go­ing to change the sen­at­or’s fate on its own. But this in­de­pend­ently run, rad­ic­ally small-gov­ern­ment mes­sage is just an­oth­er stake Paul is lay­ing on a seem­ingly in­ev­it­able path to­ward a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. Com­bine this with his im­press­ive on-the-ground in­fra­struc­ture and or­gan­iz­a­tion, and he’s quickly be­com­ing a ma­jor force for 2016.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4691) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×