Poll Shows Problems for Obama, Peril for Senate Democrats

None

US President Barack Obama makes a statement to the press on April 2, 2014 in Chicago, Illinois, on the shooting at the Fort Hood military base in Texas. One person was killed and 14 others wounded April 2, 2014 in a shooting incident at Fort Hood, a US official said.
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
April 28, 2014, 1 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing re­mains omin­ously weak among the con­stitu­en­cies that could tip the battle for con­trol of the Sen­ate in Novem­ber, the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll has found.

Obama’s over­all ap­prov­al, stand­ing at just 41 per­cent, re­mains near the low­est level ever re­cor­ded in the 20 Heart­land Mon­it­or Polls since April 2009. And only one in four adults say his ac­tions are in­creas­ing eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity for people like them, also among his worst show­ings in the polls. His num­bers are es­pe­cially mea­ger among the non-col­lege and older whites that dom­in­ate the elect­or­ate in the sev­en red-lean­ing states where Demo­crats must de­fend Sen­ate seats in Novem­ber.

These find­ings are taken from the 20th quarterly All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll con­duc­ted by the Stra­tegic Com­mu­nic­a­tions Prac­tice of FTI Con­sult­ing. The full res­ults, ex­plor­ing Amer­ic­ans’ views on how to drive so­cial and polit­ic­al change, will be pub­lished next month in Na­tion­al Journ­al’s magazine.

The one solace for Demo­crats in the new poll is that Con­gress is even more un­pop­u­lar than the pres­id­ent. Just 11 per­cent of those sur­veyed said they ap­proved of Con­gress’s per­form­ance, while 80 per­cent dis­ap­proved. In the five times the Heart­land Mon­it­or has tested Con­gress’ rat­ing since Novem­ber 2012, only last Novem­ber did it score more poorly, with just 9 per­cent ap­prov­ing and 84 per­cent dis­ap­prov­ing.

Gen­er­ally, though, at­ti­tudes to­ward the in­cum­bent pres­id­ent have played a big­ger role than views about Con­gress in shap­ing the res­ults of mid-term elec­tions. And at­ti­tudes to­ward Obama, and the na­tion’s dir­ec­tion, re­main dis­tinctly chilly.

Just 27 per­cent of those polled said they be­lieved the coun­try is mov­ing in the right dir­ec­tion; 62 per­cent say they con­sider it off on the wrong track. That’s slightly bet­ter than the res­ults last fall, but much gloom­i­er than the as­sess­ment around Obama’s reelec­tion in fall 2012. The ra­cial gap on this ques­tion is huge: 41 per­cent of minor­it­ies say the coun­try is mov­ing in the right dir­ec­tion, but only about half as many whites (22 per­cent) agree. (Among whites without a col­lege de­gree, just one in six see the coun­try mov­ing on the right track, only about half the level among whites with at least a four-year de­gree.)

In the new sur­vey, 41 per­cent of adults said they ap­proved of Obama’s job per­form­ance while 52 per­cent dis­ap­proved. Since 2009, the quarterly Heart­land Mon­it­or Polls have re­cor­ded lower ap­prov­al rat­ings for him only last Novem­ber (at 38 per­cent) and last Septem­ber (at 40 per­cent). The dif­fer­ence between those show­ings and the latest res­ult falls with­in the sur­vey’s 3.1 per­cent­age point mar­gin of er­ror.

In the latest poll, Obama also faces a for­mid­able in­tens­ity gap that could fore­shad­ow turnout chal­lenges for Demo­crats: The share of adults who strongly dis­ap­prove of his per­form­ance (39 per­cent) is nearly double that of those who strongly ap­prove (21 per­cent).

More troub­ling for Demo­crats still may be his es­pe­cially pre­cari­ous po­s­i­tion with con­stitu­en­cies that loom large for the sev­en Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates try­ing to hold Sen­ate seats in states that voted for Mitt Rom­ney in 2012.

In all of those states ““ Alaska, Arkan­sas, Louisi­ana, Montana, North Car­o­lina, South Dakota and West Vir­gin­ia ““ older whites and whites without a four-year col­lege de­gree rep­res­ent a sub­stan­tial share of the elect­or­ate. Whites over­all rep­res­ent a lar­ger share of the vote than they do na­tion­ally in all of these states ex­cept for North Car­o­lina and Louisi­ana.

Obama’s na­tion­al stand­ing re­mains tenu­ous in the new Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll with the groups that are key in those states. Among whites over­all, just 35 per­cent said they ap­prove of his per­form­ance, while 59 per­cent dis­ap­prove. That’s a slight im­prove­ment from the pre­vi­ous two Heart­land Mon­it­or Polls last fall, but still at the lower end of his range among whites since tak­ing of­fice. Obama faces an even lar­ger 62 per­cent dis­ap­prov­al from both non-col­lege whites and whites older than 50; only about one-third of each group ap­prove of his per­form­ance.

His num­bers look no bet­ter on a Heart­land Mon­it­or trend ques­tion that asks Amer­ic­ans how Obama’s ac­tions will af­fect their eco­nom­ic pro­spects. Just 25 per­cent of all re­spond­ents said they be­lieved his agenda would in­crease op­por­tun­it­ies for people like them. That’s the smal­lest pos­it­ive re­sponse the poll has re­cor­ded ex­cept for the two sur­veys last fall. In the new poll, a full 46 per­cent said they be­lieved his ac­tions would di­min­ish their op­por­tun­it­ies-es­sen­tially ty­ing the 47 per­cent in each of last fall’s polls as his worst show­ing on that meas­ure. The re­main­ing 23 per­cent said they did not think his ac­tions would af­fect their op­por­tun­it­ies.

Even these slim res­ults are boos­ted by en­dur­ing con­fid­ence among minor­it­ies: 40 per­cent of non-white re­spond­ents said Obama’s agenda would in­crease their op­por­tun­it­ies, com­pared to 24 per­cent who be­lieve it will re­duce them. But among whites, just 19 per­cent say he is in­creas­ing their chances, while a re­sound­ing 55 per­cent say he is di­min­ish­ing them.

Those num­bers don’t dif­fer much among whites older and young­er than 50 but they are es­pe­cially bad among the blue-col­lar whites who mat­ter so much in the red-lean­ing states where Demo­crats must de­fend Sen­ate seats this year. Whites without a col­lege de­gree were nearly four times as likely to say Obama’s ac­tion are de­creas­ing, rather than in­creas­ing, their op­por­tun­it­ies to get ahead.

The Demo­crat­ic red-state Sen­ate in­cum­bents fa­cing voters this year in Alaska, Arkan­sas, Louisi­ana and North Car­o­lina are demon­strat­ing sur­pris­ing re­si­li­ence in polls. But the per­vas­ive skep­ti­cism about Obama’s per­form­ance and agenda among older and blue-col­lar whites re­mains a power­ful head­wind threat­en­ing their hold on those seats ““ and their party’s hold over the Sen­ate.

The latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or sur­vey is the 20th in a series ex­amin­ing how Amer­ic­ans are ex­per­i­en­cing the chan­ging eco­nomy. The poll was con­duc­ted April 9-13 with 1,000 re­spond­ents reached by land­line and cell phones. The sur­vey was su­per­vised by Ed Re­illy, Brent McGoldrick, Jeremy Ruch and Jocelyn Land­au of the Stra­tegic Com­mu­nic­a­tions Prac­tice of FTI Con­sult­ing and has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4907) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×